Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-15-1972
Reported in : AIR1973Cal48
ORDERS.K. Hazra, J.1. This is an interlocutory application for injunction restraining the respondent No. 2, Life Insurance Corporation of India (hereinatfer called the L. I. C.) and its servants, agents, representatives, assigns, employees or otherwise from giving effect to or implementing the notice dated April 1 1972 and the enquiry report dated April 19, 1971 in any manner whatsoever pending the disposal of this suit. The notice dated April 1, 1972 is a show cause notice. By this notice the L. I. C. is calling upon the petitioner to show cause why he should not be dismissed from the service of the L.I.C.2. This show cause notice is given on the findings of the report of the enquiry officer dated April 9, 1971 that the petitioner is guilty of getting a cheque dated November 11, 1966 drawn by the L. I. C. in favour of the respondent No. 1 Shreeram Jauhar for Rs. 1,323.10 encashed through his personal bank account and misappropriating the proceeds of the cheque. On this finding, of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-25-1972
Reported in : (1973)ILLJ563Cal
Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. The petitioner is a member of Class I staff of the Damodar Valley Corporation, at the material time being an Executive Engineer in the office of the General Superintendent, Transmission, Maithon. The petitioner was originally appointed as a direct 'recruit' on May 10, 1954, and thereafter, he was appointed in the permanent post of assistant engineer, electrical, with effect from March 1, 1960. This will also appear from paragraph 6 of the affidavit-in-opposition as also the annexure 'G' (letter of the corporation dated the 16th August, 1966). At the time the petitioner joined his service his date of birth was recorded on the basis of a birth certificate issued by the Rajpur Municipality as November 4, 1915. This date of birth was also accepted and recorded in the gradation lists subsequently published by the corporation from time to time.2. It appears that the petitioner on the requisition of the corporation forwarded to it his matriculation certificate which sh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-09-1972
Reported in : AIR1973Cal69
ORDERSabyasachi Mukharji, J. 1. The petitioner is a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act. The petitioner states that the petitioner under an actual user's import licence imported diverse consignments of G. P. Sheets which were duly landed from the relative vessels at the Port of Calcutta and thereafter taken charge of and stored in sheds and warehouses belonging to the Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta who are the respondents to this application. Upon landing of the said goods the petitioner submitted through its clearing agents to the Customs Authorities, Calcutta, the relative bills of entry and complied with the Import Trade Control formalities for the clearance of the goods. But the clearance thereof was withheld. In consequence the goods remained for a considerable period of time in the custody of the respondent. Pending the Customs clearance of the goods the same were caused to be removed by the petitioner into the bonded warehouse and the last of suc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-31-1972
Reported in : AIR1972Cal295
ORDERRamendra Mohan Datta, J. 1. This is an application for an order that the award dated April 29, 1971 be declared null and void and/or be set aside. 2. The facts are that on or about 1955 the then National Life Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter called the said company) accepted the tender of the respondent for the construction of a building at New Delhi. The work orders were issued and the respondent was asked to commence the work on the understanding that the formal contract would be issued in due course. In the matter of the said agreement the petitioner's architects Messrs. Ballardie, Thompson and Matthews acted as the agent of the petitioner all throughout. The petitioner from time to time made various payments against the running bills submitted by the respondent on the certificate of the said architects in terms of the said agreement. In 1956 the Life Insurance Corporation of India came into existence and the said Corporation duly took over the said contract on behalf of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-25-1972
Reported in : AIR1973Cal233,76CWN411
B.C. Mttra, J.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated June 22, 1970, by which the appellant's application for a Rule Nisi for appropriate Writs and orders against certain notifications, appointing a Commission of Inquiry to enquire into certain matters, was dismissed. Although no Rule was issued, notice was directed to be served on the second and third respondents, who appeared at the hearing of the application and contested the s;tme. The appellant claims to be a member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and as such contested a by-election from Raina, District Burdwan and was elected a Member of the Legislative Assembly in 1969.2. On March 16, 1970, Shri Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, who was the Chief Minister of the then United Front Ministry resigned. This resignation was followed by a Hartal, called by the appellant's party. The call for Hartal was opposed by a number of political parties who constituted the then United Front. This call for Hartal, and the oppo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-08-1972
Reported in : AIR1973Cal268
Hazra, J.1. The petitioner West Bengal Financial Corporation is a body corporate established under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (Act, LXIII of 1951) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The petitioner No. 2 Shri Kalipada Chatterjee is an Officer of the West Bengal Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Financial Corporation). The respondent is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent company).2. This application by the petitioner is under Sections 31 and 32 of the said Act. The prayer of the petitioner is for (a) sale of land, buildings, machinery and other assets mortgaged and charged in favour of the Financial Corporation, (b) ad interim order of attachment (c) ad interim order of injunction (d) for notice to be issued calling upon the respondent company to show cause why the ad interim orders of attachment and injunction should not be made absolute, (e) if the respondents fail t...
Tag this Judgment!