Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-06-2022
- 1 - WP No.28392 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.28392 OF2018(L-RES) BETWEEN: TUMAKURU CITY CORPORATION, (EARLIER TUMKUR TOWN MUNICIPALCORPORATION TUMAKURU572102. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA R., ADVOCATE) AND:1. TUMKURU POURA KARMIKARA SANGHA (REGD.) JAI BHEEM ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, TUMAKURU 572 102 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY2 SRI D. GANESH SHANKAR S/O. LATE SRI. CHINNA VENKANNA AGED ABOUT76YEARS R/AT "SRIHARI NILAYA" NO.37, 8TH CROSS, KJE LAYOUT, RMV2D STAGE, BENGALURU 560 094.3. SRI M VENKATESH (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) - 2 - WP No.28392 of 2018 AGED MAJOR R/AT24H MAIN, 13TH CROSS, HSR LAYOUT, AGARA, BENGALURU 560 102.4. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIDHANA SOUDHA B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU560001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY5 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU572102. RESPO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-13-2022
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI WRIT PETITION NO.5132 OF2021(L-PF) BETWEEN: THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND, COMMISSIONER-I, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, #570, RAJA RAJESHWARI REGENCY, 26TH CROSS, IDEAL HOME CO-OP. SOCIETY, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 098. ... PETITIONER (BY SMT. NANDITA D HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. BOMBAY RAYON FASHIONS LIMITED, (UNIT-19), #320/8, MYSORE ROAD, OPP: B.H.E.L, BENGALURU-560 026 BY MANAGING DIRECTOR. ... RESPONDENT2THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN EPF/ITB/156/2017 FROM THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, G. NARENDAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Petitioner is be...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Oct-21-2022
- 1 - WP No.362 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.362 OF2021(L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS (MADURAI) PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 OFFICE AT NO.1, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER MR. P. SURESH KUMAR ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI. MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA RAJA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU-560 022 2. THE REGIONAL PROVISION FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, NO.13 RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD BENGALURU-560 025 3. MR. NAGESH POLLALI S/O MR. KANTHAPPA POOJARI MAJOR R/AT2181, YOGYA MANE KARIYANGALA VILLAGE - 2 - WP No.362 of 2021 BANTWAL TALUK, POST POLALI DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 219 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H. SHANTI BHUSHAN, ASG...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-30-2022
..... invoking the provisions of memorandum of association & articles of association, is also not in dispute. the fkcci as already mentioned above, falls in section 8 of the 2013 act which corresponds to section 25 of the erstwhile companies act, 1956. the relation between a company of this kind and its members is essentially contractual in nature; since moa/aoa have a ..... does not avail even against a state or its instrumentality, should its actions lack required amount of public law elements vide life insurance company vs. escorts ltd4, as rightly contended by sr. advocates appearing for the contesting respondents. b. as to contractual nature of membership qua ..... ; however there is nothing in them that repels doing of gainful things like this. these things are internalized by making suitable provisions in the corporate policies. this is how the extant moa/aoa appear to have been structured in the fkcci. (iii) the above having been said, it cannot be denied that there ..... kassia) at rule 10(a) reads: the scrutiny committee shall consist of a past president as chairman, the vice president as co-chairman this committee scrutinizes the application for membership. it hardly needs to be stated that this is not a solitary instance. statutes as such, in so many words may not say this explicitly ..... road, bengaluru560022.21. mr.n s srinivasa murthy, aged:adult, s/o not known, mastruri, no.43, midlle school road, vv puram, bengaluru560004.22. mr.j.r. bangera, aged:adult, s/o not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-04-2022
..... there was no report of the electrical inspector under section 161 of the indian electricity act and not as in the present cases.26. the report under section 161 being made in exercise of the statutory scheme which provides for an inquiry in the event of loss of animal or human life requires to be given due weightage and be construed to be binding on the respondent corporations as long as the same is not set aside and is to ..... claims for compensation which is sought to be asserted by way of a writ petition. liability for torts committed by the agents of the state being an accepted principle, question whether a litigant is to be 43 driven to avail of the remedy before the civil court is not a necessity. once the liability of the state entity is established as in the present case in light of discussion, by virtue of principle ..... .2. w.p.no.6087/2019 (a) contentions of petitioner (i) the petitioner has contended that the authorities have violated rule 80 of indian electricity rules, 1956 insofar as the distance of the high voltage line from the 16 building. it is further submitted that the respondents were aware of such violation and had issued notice to the ..... laid down in bhagyabai (supra) at para 11, wherein the court has adopted the principles as applicable under the motor vehicles act, compensation is determined in the present case following the same principle.41. the apex court in united india insurance co. ltd. v. satinder kaur20 has interpreted the law laid down in pranay sethi .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-04-2022
..... there was no report of the electrical inspector under section 161 of the indian electricity act and not as in the present cases.26. the report under section 161 being made in exercise of the statutory scheme which provides for an inquiry in the event of loss of animal or human life requires to be given due weightage and be construed to be binding on the respondent corporations as long as the same is not set aside and is to ..... claims for compensation which is sought to be asserted by way of a writ petition. liability for torts committed by the agents of the state being an accepted principle, question whether a litigant is to be 43 driven to avail of the remedy before the civil court is not a necessity. once the liability of the state entity is established as in the present case in light of discussion, by virtue of principle ..... .2. w.p.no.6087/2019 (a) contentions of petitioner (i) the petitioner has contended that the authorities have violated rule 80 of indian electricity rules, 1956 insofar as the distance of the high voltage line from the 16 building. it is further submitted that the respondents were aware of such violation and had issued notice to the ..... laid down in bhagyabai (supra) at para 11, wherein the court has adopted the principles as applicable under the motor vehicles act, compensation is determined in the present case following the same principle.41. the apex court in united india insurance co. ltd. v. satinder kaur20 has interpreted the law laid down in pranay sethi .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-04-2022
..... there was no report of the electrical inspector under section 161 of the indian electricity act and not as in the present cases.26. the report under section 161 being made in exercise of the statutory scheme which provides for an inquiry in the event of loss of animal or human life requires to be given due weightage and be construed to be binding on the respondent corporations as long as the same is not set aside and is to ..... claims for compensation which is sought to be asserted by way of a writ petition. liability for torts committed by the agents of the state being an accepted principle, question whether a litigant is to be 43 driven to avail of the remedy before the civil court is not a necessity. once the liability of the state entity is established as in the present case in light of discussion, by virtue of principle ..... .2. w.p.no.6087/2019 (a) contentions of petitioner (i) the petitioner has contended that the authorities have violated rule 80 of indian electricity rules, 1956 insofar as the distance of the high voltage line from the 16 building. it is further submitted that the respondents were aware of such violation and had issued notice to the ..... laid down in bhagyabai (supra) at para 11, wherein the court has adopted the principles as applicable under the motor vehicles act, compensation is determined in the present case following the same principle.41. the apex court in united india insurance co. ltd. v. satinder kaur20 has interpreted the law laid down in pranay sethi .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-30-2022
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR MFA NO.919/2019(MV-D) C/W MFA CROB NO.29/2019(MV-D) IN MFA NO.919/2019: BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE NO.18, 5TH AND6H FLOOR KRISHI BHAVAN OPP. TO HUDSON CIRCLE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. LAKSHMINARASAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.M. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. INDU SINGH W/O VIVEKANAND SINGH AGED ABOUT51YEARS2 SRI. VIVEKANANDA SINGH S/O PRABAL PRATAP SINGH AGED ABOUT55YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.1/6B COSSIPUR ROAD, CHITPUR KOLKATA-700 002 WEST BENGAL STATE23. SRI. JAGADEESHA .D S/O DUGAPPA A.R. NO.528, NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL NELALUR, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU (OWNER OF CAR BEARING REG. NO.KA-03/D-6841) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.P. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI. K.T. MADHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 V/O DTD:25-1-2022, NOTICE TO R3-HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS APPEAL IS FIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-30-2022
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR MFA NO.919/2019(MV-D) C/W MFA CROB NO.29/2019(MV-D) IN MFA NO.919/2019: BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE NO.18, 5TH AND6H FLOOR KRISHI BHAVAN OPP. TO HUDSON CIRCLE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. LAKSHMINARASAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.M. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SMT. INDU SINGH W/O VIVEKANAND SINGH AGED ABOUT51YEARS2 SRI. VIVEKANANDA SINGH S/O PRABAL PRATAP SINGH AGED ABOUT55YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.1/6B COSSIPUR ROAD, CHITPUR KOLKATA-700 002 WEST BENGAL STATE23. SRI. JAGADEESHA .D S/O DUGAPPA A.R. NO.528, NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL NELALUR, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU (OWNER OF CAR BEARING REG. NO.KA-03/D-6841) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.P. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI. K.T. MADHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 V/O DTD:25-1-2022, NOTICE TO R3-HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS APPEAL IS FIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-16-2022
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH M.F.A.NO.1914/2017 (MV-I) BETWEEN1 SRI SALEEM AHAMMED S/O MUNEER AHAMMED AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/O NO.55, 1ST BLOCK DEVANAYAKANAHALLI HONNALI TALUK-577217 DAVANAGERE DISTRICT2 SRI MOHAMMED JALEEL S/O MOHAMMED HAYATH SAB AGED ABOUT51YEARS R/O STAR SERVICE CENTRE T B CIRCLE, OPP: BEO OFFICE HONNALI TOWN-577217 DAVANAGERE DISTRICT ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI V B SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND1 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. 2ND FLOOR, DENTAL COLLEGE ROAD2DAVANAGERE-577101 REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER2 KUM SUPRIYA D/O BASAVANAGOUDA AGED ABOUT10YEARS MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. JAYASHREE N.R. W/O BASAVANAGOUDA AGED ABOUT33YEARS R/O KOMARANAHALLI HARIHAR TOWN-577 601 DAVANAGERE DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS (BY S SRISHAILA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SHRUTHI, ADVOCATE FOR VINAYA KEERTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUD...
Tag this Judgment!