Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 section 43 application of the insurance act Court: karnataka Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.128 seconds)

Sep 09 1960 (HC)

United Karnatak Insurance Company Ltd. (Successor - Life Insurance Cor ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-1960

Reported in : (1961)ILLJ472Kant

Hegde, J. 1. These proceedings arise out of the decree and judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, at Dharwar, in Special C.S. No. 12 of 1951 on his file. The appellant is the defendant in that suit and the respondent is the plaintiff. 2. The defendant at the relevant time was a public limited company (which shall be hereinafter referred to as 'the company') carrying on insurance business having had its head office at Dharwar. The plaintiff was a servant under that company. He joined that company in the year 1931. Between 1931 and 1936, he served the company in different capacities. He was appointed as the manager of that company in about October 1936. On 7th April, 1948 the managing director of the company placed the plaintiff under suspension on the basis of certain charges served on him. That order of the managing director was duly approved by the directors subsequently. Ultimately the plaintiff was dismissed from the company's services by the board of directors. The p...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1960 (HC)

United Karnatak Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Govardhana Rao Venkata Rao

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Kant49; AIR1961Mys49; ILR1960KAR1100

Hegde, J.1. These proceedings arise out of the decree and judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Dharwar, in Special Civil Suit No. 12 or 1951 on his file. The appellant is the defendant in that suit and the respondent is the plaintiff.2. The defendant at the relevant time was a Public Limited Company (which shall he hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') carrying on insurance business having had its head office at Dharwar. The plaintiff was a servant under that Company. He joined that Company in the year 1931. Between 1931 to 1936 he served the Company in different capacities. He was appointed as the Manager of that Company in about October 1936. On 7-4-1948 the Managing Director of the Company placed the plaintiff under suspension On the basis of certain charges served on him.That order of the Managing Director was duly approved by the Directors subsequently. Ultimately the plaintiff was dismissed from the Company's services by the Board of Directors. The plaintif...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //