Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-20-2017
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the fair and final order dated 01.08.2015 passed in R.C.A.No.23 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore (Appellate Authority) confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 04.09.2013 passed in R.C.O.P.No.83 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore (Rent Controller).) 1. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the fair and final order dated 01.08.2015 passed in R.C.A.No.23 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore (Appellate Authority) confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 04.09.2013 passed in R.C.O.P.No.83 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Co imbatore (Rent Controller). 2. The respondents 1 to 3 herein as petitioner/landlord has filed R.C.O.P.No.83 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore for eviction on the groun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-01-2017
(Prayer: This Revision is filed under Section 401 r/w 397 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1267 of 2014 in C.C.No.163 of 1996 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai, dated 18.05.2015 refusing to discharge the petitioner from the case.) 1. This revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1267 of 2014 in C.C.No.163 of 1996, dated 18.05.2015 by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai, refusing to discharge the petitioner from the case. 2. The facts leading to the case are as follows:- The respondent/complainant preferred a complaint under Sections 8(1), 9(1)(c) and 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai stating that the accused company, who were telecasting under logo J.J TV had hired transponder abro...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-02-2017
(Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2004 made in A.S.No.49 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2003 made in O.S.No.138 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai.) 1. This second appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of the Courts below, by dismissing the suit filed by the appellant herein stating that his father Ponnusamy was not heard for more than seven years and therefore to declare him presumed to a dead person as contemplated in Section 108 of Indian Evidence Act. The plaintiff was examined as P.W.1 and one independent witness Manian was examined as P.W.2 and the paper publication was marked as Ex.A.1. The Courts below dis-believed the same and refused to grant the relief as the plaintiff not examined his mother and sister to substantiate his claim. The first appellate Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-01-2017
(Prayer: This Revision is filed under Section 379 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order, dated 18th May 2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.524 of 2014 in E.O.C.C.No.84 of 2001 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court No.II), Egmore, Chennai 600 008.) 1. This petition is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.524 of 2014 in E.O.C.C.No.84 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court No.II), Egmore, Chennai, dated 18.05.2015 discharging the respondent from the case. 2. The facts leading to the case are as follows:- The petitioner/complainant preferred a complaint under Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973, punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the said Act r/w Sub Section 3(3) and (4) of Section 49 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.II), Egmore, Madras-8 stating that the accused had acquired forei...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-01-2017
(Prayer: This Revision is filed under Section 379 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order, dated 18th May 2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1271 of 2014 in C.C.No.168 of 2001 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court No.I), Egmore, Chennai 600 008.) 1. This petition is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1271 of 2014 in C.C.No.168 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court No.I), Egmore, Chennai, dated 18.05.2015 discharging the respondent from the case. 2. The facts leading to the case are as follows:- The petitioner/complainant preferred a complaint under Sections 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973, punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of the said Act r/w Sub Section 3(3) and (4) of Section 49 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.I), Egmore, Madras-8 stating that the accused had acquired foreign exchange without...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-14-2017
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.02.2016 made in M.C.O.P.No.148 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Krishnagiri.) 1. Challenging the negligence as well as the quantum of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, in M.C.O.P.No.148 of 2014,dated 16.02.2016 , the Transport Corporation has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 2. The deceased, aged 35 years, who was selected as a Typist in TNPSC Group IV test held in the year 2013 and was also working as Office Superintendent in private import and export Company in Chennai, earning a sum of Rs. 20,000/- per month and who was maintaining her husband and two minor children, died in an accident that took place on 04.03.2014. 3. Claiming a sum of Rs.25,00,000/-, as compensation, the Legal Representatives of the deceased filed claim petition for compensation. 4. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions made o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-03-2017
(Prayer : The Civil Suit filed Under Order VII Rule 1 CPC read with Order IV Rule of the Original Side Rules praying for the following reliefs a. directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.39,65,619/- (Rupees Thirty Nine lakhs sixty five thousand six hundred and nineteen only) together with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on Rs.31,55,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realisation. b. directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as damages, for the mental agony caused to the plaintiff due to inordinate delay and unjustified rejection of the claim and c. Cost of this suit.) 1. The Suit filed for a direction directing the defendant insurance company to pay a sum of Rs.39,65,619/- together with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on Rs.31,55,000/- from the date of filing this suit till the date of realisation and also to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as damages for mental agony caused to the plaintiff for delay in rejection of the claim and for costs. 2. The P...
Tag this Judgment!