Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-05-1981
Reported in : AIR1981AP125
..... life insurance corporation act, from which it appeared that the central government had contributed the original capital, that, part of the profit of the corporation goes to the government, that, the central government exercises control over the policies of the corporation; that, the corporation carries on a business having great public importance; and that, the corporation enjoys a monopoly hi the business, and concluded on this basis that the corporation is an agency or an instrumentality of the state. the same conclusion was also recorded with respect to the other two corporations ..... corporation incorporated under the provisions of the indian companies act, 1956, may be a private limited company or a public limited company, or a government company as defined in section 617. a corporation may be brought into existence by a statute, which is generally referred to as a statutory corporation. a corporation ..... applicable ..... life insurance corporation is owned by the government. the life insurance business is nationalised and vested in the corporation. no other insurer can carry on life insurance business. the management is by the government. the dissolution can be only by the government.the industdial finance corporation ..... corporation ..... corporation ..... corporation ..... corporations ..... corporation, and that ..... corporation ..... act ..... corporation ..... act ..... corporation ltd., (hereinafter referred to as 'the irrigation corporation ..... corporation ..... corporation ..... corporation ..... corporations ..... corporation ..... corporation ..... act. ..... corporations ..... corporation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-05-1981
Reported in : (1982)ILLJ224AP
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. 1. Writ Petitions Nos. 3477, 3459 respondent-Corporation, viz., the Andhra Pradesh State Irrigation Development Corporation - a corporation created not by a statute but incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Before the learned Judges it was contended on behalf of the petitioners that an earlier Bench decision in W.P. No. 5904 of 78, dated 8th December, 1979, was not correctly decided. Reliance was placed upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority, [1979-II L.L.J. 217], and the opinion of Chinnappa Reddy, J., in U.P. Warehousing Corporation v. Vijay Narayan Vajpayee, [1980-II L.L.J. 222]. When the matter came up before the Full Bench on 24th November, 1980, it was brought to our notice that the Supreme Court has dealt with this very question in a writ petition relating to the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., and it would be advisable for this Bench to await a copy of the decision in that case. According...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-27-1981
Reported in : AIR1981AP165
P.A. Choudary, J.1. This writ appeal is against an order of our learned brother Gangadhara Rao, J., dismissing the petitioner's writ petition filed seeking a declaration from this Court that the acceptance of the tender of the second respondent-Con-tractor to construct a group of houses at Sulurpet for housing the employees of the Space Project at Sriharikota by the Construction Engineer of Sriharikota Space Organization, the first respondent herein is illegal and an order directing the first respondent to consider the tenders opened on 21-1-1980 and to accept the petitioner's tender.2. Construction Engineer, Civil Engineering Division, Department of Space, Government of India, Sriharikota, Nellore, invited sealed tenders for the construction of 'D' and 'E' types of quarters for housing those working in the Space Project at Sriharikota. The officially estimated cost of construction of these homes was around Rs. 11,87,000/-.The petitioner which is a firm of contractors offered through i...
Tag this Judgment!