Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 chapter 7 miscellaneous Sorted by: recent Page 6 of about 30,153 results (0.291 seconds)

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

The Managing Director Vs. Gouramma W/o Rameshappa Koller

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the relevant applicable multiplier is 15 as per smt. sarla verma & others vs. delhi transport corporation & anr.131. the tribunal has not considered future prospects of the deceased as per the decision of the hon ble apex court in national insurance co. ltd., vs. pranay sethi and others2 1 air2009sc31042 air2017sc5157- 25 - nc:2024. khc ..... paid a sum of rs.50,000/- as ex-gratia payment immediately after the accident. it was an act of grace. therefore, it should not have been deducted from compensation awarded to claimants. similarly, the insurance company should not have been directed to pay the same to ksrtc.5. shri nagaraj, learned counsel for the ..... to determine whether the accident occurred due to the driver's negligence. the actionable negligence of the driver alone is adequate to establish the rash and negligent act committed. hence, arguments raised on behalf of the appellant in this matter cannot be upheld.19. after considering the evidence presented by both parties, the tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

The Managing Director Vs. Shivanadappa S/o Veerabasappa Majjiger

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the relevant applicable multiplier is 15 as per smt. sarla verma & others vs. delhi transport corporation & anr.131. the tribunal has not considered future prospects of the deceased as per the decision of the hon ble apex court in national insurance co. ltd., vs. pranay sethi and others2 1 air2009sc31042 air2017sc5157- 25 - nc:2024. khc ..... paid a sum of rs.50,000/- as ex-gratia payment immediately after the accident. it was an act of grace. therefore, it should not have been deducted from compensation awarded to claimants. similarly, the insurance company should not have been directed to pay the same to ksrtc.5. shri nagaraj, learned counsel for the ..... to determine whether the accident occurred due to the driver's negligence. the actionable negligence of the driver alone is adequate to establish the rash and negligent act committed. hence, arguments raised on behalf of the appellant in this matter cannot be upheld.19. after considering the evidence presented by both parties, the tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2024 (HC)

Gouramma Vs. The Managing Director

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the relevant applicable multiplier is 15 as per smt. sarla verma & others vs. delhi transport corporation & anr.131. the tribunal has not considered future prospects of the deceased as per the decision of the hon ble apex court in national insurance co. ltd., vs. pranay sethi and others2 1 air2009sc31042 air2017sc5157- 25 - nc:2024. khc ..... paid a sum of rs.50,000/- as ex-gratia payment immediately after the accident. it was an act of grace. therefore, it should not have been deducted from compensation awarded to claimants. similarly, the insurance company should not have been directed to pay the same to ksrtc.5. shri nagaraj, learned counsel for the ..... to determine whether the accident occurred due to the driver's negligence. the actionable negligence of the driver alone is adequate to establish the rash and negligent act committed. hence, arguments raised on behalf of the appellant in this matter cannot be upheld.19. after considering the evidence presented by both parties, the tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2024 (HC)

Sri. Paras Jain Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council

Court : Karnataka

..... obtaining property to an extent of1) 22.5% of the area as marked in sketches,2) 22.5% in compensation amount to be received from bangalore metro rail corporation,3) mesne profits. all these amounts to obtaining more than 9.00 crores towards share of adv. mr. paras jain alone. copies of order sheet, plaint, ..... imaginary injury; a person aggrieved must, therefore, necessarily be one whose right or interest has been adversely affected or jeopardised. (vide shanti kumar r. canji v. home insurance co. of new york [(1974) 2 scc387 air1974sc1719 and state of rajasthan v. union of india [(1977) 3 scc592 air1977sc1361.) 17. in view of the above, ..... alleging professional misconduct, the bar council is obliged to consider at least, prima facie, whether the allegations constitute a professional or other misconduct. sections 35 of the advocates act, 1961, enables the bar council to inquire into (i) complaints of professional misconduct and (ii) complaints of other misconduct. in the case on hand, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2024 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs. Smt. Girijavva W/o Basavappa Totagi

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... deceased left behind him his wife, who is claimant no.1. in view of law laid down in the case of sarla verma and others vs. delhi transport corporation and another3 and national insurance company limited vs. pranay sethi and 3 2009 (6) scc121- 17 - nc:2024. khc-d:7234-db mfa no.102474 of 2017 c/w mfa no ..... ground that driver of offended vehicle had no valid and effective driving licence or other technical reasons since the provision of motor vehicles act pertaining to compensation is benevolent legislation. therefore, in this case also, insurer cannot deny its liability on technical ground that driver of the offended bulldozer had no valid driving licence to drive that class of ..... the natural corollary is that the advantage which accrues to the estate of the deceased or to his dependents as a result of some contract or act which the deceased performed in his life time cannot be said to be the outcome or result of the death of the deceased even though these amounts may go into the hands of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2024 (HC)

Kumar Omkar S/o. Somanath Bashetti, Vs. M/s. P B Ibrahim,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... deceased left behind him his wife, who is claimant no.1. in view of law laid down in the case of sarla verma and others vs. delhi transport corporation and another3 and national insurance company limited vs. pranay sethi and 3 2009 (6) scc121- 17 - nc:2024. khc-d:7234-db mfa no.102474 of 2017 c/w mfa no ..... ground that driver of offended vehicle had no valid and effective driving licence or other technical reasons since the provision of motor vehicles act pertaining to compensation is benevolent legislation. therefore, in this case also, insurer cannot deny its liability on technical ground that driver of the offended bulldozer had no valid driving licence to drive that class of ..... the natural corollary is that the advantage which accrues to the estate of the deceased or to his dependents as a result of some contract or act which the deceased performed in his life time cannot be said to be the outcome or result of the death of the deceased even though these amounts may go into the hands of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2024 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs. Kumar Omkar S/o Somanath Bashetti

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... deceased left behind him his wife, who is claimant no.1. in view of law laid down in the case of sarla verma and others vs. delhi transport corporation and another3 and national insurance company limited vs. pranay sethi and 3 2009 (6) scc121- 17 - nc:2024. khc-d:7234-db mfa no.102474 of 2017 c/w mfa no ..... ground that driver of offended vehicle had no valid and effective driving licence or other technical reasons since the provision of motor vehicles act pertaining to compensation is benevolent legislation. therefore, in this case also, insurer cannot deny its liability on technical ground that driver of the offended bulldozer had no valid driving licence to drive that class of ..... the natural corollary is that the advantage which accrues to the estate of the deceased or to his dependents as a result of some contract or act which the deceased performed in his life time cannot be said to be the outcome or result of the death of the deceased even though these amounts may go into the hands of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2024 (HC)

The New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Bibi Nafisa

Court : Karnataka

..... ) of section 149 of the motor - 10 - nc:2024. khc:19292 mfa no.7683 of 2014 c/w mfa.crob no.54 of 2020 vehicles act, 1988, if any of the conditions is violated, though insurance company can be exonerated from the liability, but the order of pay and recovery can be made. but in the present case, while considering sub-clause ..... the vehicle and caused the accident, this proviso is not applicable so as to say that terms and conditions of the insurance company are violated. where a minor boy under the age of 16 years ..... (ii) of sub-section (2) of section 149 of the motor vehicles act, in the case of a minor boy of 16 years old who was riding .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2024 (SC)

Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited Vs. Tamil Nadu Medical ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... have reached the age of superannuation would be entitled to compensation in lieu of regularization as recognized in ranbir singh v. s.k. roy, chairman, life insurance corporation of india & anr.14. analysis and consideration16 the relevant provisions for the adjudication of the present dispute are reproduced below for ease of reference :- 2. definitions ..... claim questioning non-employment was sustainable, given that the inspector of labour had already passed orders in that regard?. facts in brief6 the corporation was incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956 on 1st july, 1994. its management is under the state of tamil nadu. it has employed various workmen in different capacities, ..... on which]. - (i) he has been laid-off under an agreement or as permitted by standing orders made under the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946 (central act xx of 1946) or under any other law 12|slp(c)30005/2019 applicable to the industrial establishment; (ii) he has been on leave with full .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2024 (SC)

Shaji Poulose Vs. The Institute Of Chartered Accountants Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 22.02.1988 recommended that every chartered accountant be permitted to conduct a maximum of twenty tax audits of non-corporate assessees every year in addition to entitlement of audits conducted under the companies act and other statutes. considering the recommendation of the professional development committee, on 28.04.1988 30.04.1988, the ..... stoop to such tactics, yet, it upheld the restriction because it sought to prevent a possible abhorrent misconduct and malpractice that would be corrosive to public life. the reasoning in sakhawant ali was to the effect that disqualification of a legal practitioner from contesting elections did not prevent him from practising his profession ..... on behalf of the municipality t.c. (civil) no.29 of 2021 etc. 99 or to act against the municipality. this court emphasised upon the salutary object of the disqualification, i.e., the purity of public life, which would invariably be thwarted if there arose a situation where there was a conflict between interest and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //