Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 chapter 7 miscellaneous Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 4,353 results (0.176 seconds)

Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Retired L.i.C. Office ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC1485; [2008(117)FLR1]; JT2008(2)SC337; (2008)2MLJ932(SC); 2008(2)SCALE484; (2008)3SCC321; 2008(2)SLJ480(SC); 2008AIRSCW1552; AIR2008SC1485; 2008(3)SCC321; 2008(2)Supreme157; 2008(2)LH(SC)1240; 2008(3)KCCRSN213

..... exercise of its powers conferred upon it by clauses (b) and (bb) of sub-section (2) of section 49 of the life insurance corporation act, 1956, with the previous approval of the central government, made regulations known as 'life insurance corporation of india (staff) regulations, 1960 (in short 'the regulations'). chapter iv of the said regulations deal with 'pay and allowances'. regulation 51 thereof reads as under ..... . we may notice only the admitted facts herein.respondent no. 1 is an association of officers who have retired from the services of the appellant-corporation which is a statutory authority constituted and incorporated under the life insurance corporation act, 1956.during the period of 1st august, 1992 and 31st july, 1994 a revision of scales of pay of the offices and employees of the .....

B.M. Lakshmanamurthy Vs. the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC759; [1974(28)FLR223]; (1974)ILLJ304SC; (1974)4SCC365; [1974]3SCR142

..... . : (1967)iillj40sc counsel also relied upon a decision of the delhi high court in employees' state insurance corporation v. peter sewing machine co. etc. : air1970delhi182 , dealing with the definition of 'factory' under section 2(12) of the act. the high court, inter alia, was posing a question in that case as to whether the whole or any ..... view to promote the schemes and avoid the mischief. from some of the material provisions set out above, the underlying aim of the act is to insure the employees against various risks to their life, health arid well being and the charge is upon the principal employer even though he may get his usual work done through an ..... intermediary, who is described in the act as 'immediate employer'. any dispute between the principal employer and the immediate employer is to be settled .....

New Jersey Steam Navigation Co. Vs. Merchants' Bank

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the said william f. harnden has hereunto set his hand and seal, and the president of the said new jersey steam navigation company has hereto affixed his signature and the corporate seal of the company." "wm. f. harnden [l.s.]" "ch. overing handy, president " "sealed and delivered in presence of" "roswell e. lockwood" it is ..... adheres to that description, he cannot be responsible for anything beyond or inconsistent with it. the rule which makes him an insurer against everything but the act of god or the public enemy makes him an insurer as to performances only which are consistent with his undertaking as carrier. a common carrier of travelers is bound to the ..... in these words ( see statute before cited, sec. 12): "that every captain . . . by whose misconduct, negligence, or inattention to his or their respective duties, the life or lives of any person on board said vessel may be destroyed, shall be deemed guilty of manslaughter," &c.; showing, then, as the facts seem to do here, wrongs .....

Passenger Cases

Court : US Supreme Court

..... inevitable that many local matters and details must be left to be regulated by some local authorities. yet, as explained in the license cases, like the by-laws of corporations, made by them and not the legislature, they must not conflict with the general regulations or laws prescribed by the paramount power. but so far from being exclusive, even ..... or may not be completed on arriving in port without landing, according as the parties may have been pleased to stipulate. brig lavinia, 1 pet.adm. 126. so the insurance on a cargo of a ship may not in some cases terminate till it is landed, though in others it may, depending on the language used. reyner v. pearson, ..... town a sum not less than fifty nor more than two thousand dollars." " sec. 5th. the provisions of this act shall not apply to any vessel coming on shore in distress, or to any alien passengers taken from any wreck when life is in danger." " sec. 6th. the twenty-seventh section of the forty-sixth chapter of the revised statutes is .....

Scott Vs. Sandford

Court : US Supreme Court

..... him or her to be confined to labor for any time not exceeding six calendar months." and in a subsequent part of the same section, the act authorizes the corporation "to prescribe the terms and conditions upon which free negroes and mulattoes may reside in the city." this law, like the laws of the states, ..... the power which the general government exercised over slavery in this territory, as altogether inapplicable to the case before us. but the case of the american and ocean insurance companies v. canter, 1 pet. 511, has been quoted as establishing a different construction of this clause of the constitution. there is, however, not the ..... in the main similar principles, yet in some respects had become unlike, and, on a particular subject, promised to be antagonistic. their systems provided protection for life, liberty, and property among their citizens, and for the determination of the condition and capacity of the persons domiciled within their limits. these institutions, for the most .....

Miller Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... not affect the prosecution, conviction, or punishment of persons guilty of treason before the passage of the act unless such persons are convicted under the act itself. the fifth section enacts: "that to insure the speedy termination of the present rebellion, it shall be the duty of the president of the united states to cause the seizure ..... seizure. in all cases where the garnishee is a debtor or where the garnishment is of stocks, it is effected by serving notice upon the debtor or corporation. a corporation holds its stock as a quasi- trustee for its stockholders. the service of an attachment, though it is but a notice, binds the debt or the ..... in some of its features, and that he intended to veto it. his objections were that the restriction of the constitution concerning forfeitures not extending beyond the life of the offender had been disregarded. to meet this objection, which had been communicated to members of the house of representatives, where the bill originated, a .....

Miller Vs. State

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the restrictions ordained by the constitution of the state, and to the reservations contained in the general law of the state relating to corporations, and also in the general railroad act, which it is admitted prescribes and defines the powers and privileges of the railroad company. section one of article eight of the constitution ..... general law. [ footnote 23 ] so where the legislature, in granting a charter to an insurance company, reserved the right to alter it, and they subsequently exercised that right by declaring that if the assets of such corporation should pass into the hands of a receiver, he might make assessments upon the premium notes, ..... mclaren v. pennington, 1 paige ch. 102. [ footnote 23 ] pennsylvania college cases, 13 wall. 213; general hospital v. insurance co., 4 gray 227; roxbury v. railroad co., 6 cushing 424; suydam v. moore, 8 barb. 363; angel & ames on corporations, 9th ed., 767. [ footnote 24 ] hyatt v. mcmahon, 25 barb. 467. [ footnote 25 ] commonwealth v. essex .....

Bailey Vs. Railroad Company

Court : US Supreme Court

..... stockholders, they were not of the character which the law intended to reach, because the dividends subjected to the tax were only those from which, by the act, the corporation could deduct the 5 percent imposed on the income of a stockholder, derived by him in the form of a dividend." "my conclusion is that the ..... ] railroad v. commonwealth, 100 mass. 404. [ footnote 16 ] brown v. coal & navigation company, 49 pa.st. 273; people v. new york, 16 n.y. 427. [ footnote 17 ] insurance company v. mayor, 4 selden 250; same v. supervisors, 4 comstock 445. [ footnote 18 ] swift v. poughkeepsie, 37 n.y. 512. [ footnote 19 ] curtis v. fiedler, 2 black 478; ..... at large 102, amending section nineteen of the act of 1864. [ footnote 4 ] 2 sessions acts of new york, 1869, chapter 917, page 2402. [ footnote 5 ] 52 n.y. 366. [ footnote 6 ] barnes v. railroads, 17 wall. 303. [ footnote 7 ] united states v. railroad company, 17 wall. 327. [ footnote 8 ] stockdale v. insurance company, 20 wall. 323. [ footnote 9 .....

Doyle Vs. Continental Insurance Company

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the city of new york, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of connecticut and a citizen of that state. that prior to the passage of the act of the legislature of the state of wisconsin, entitled "an act to provide for the incorporation and government of fire and inland navigation insurance companies," approved march 4, 1870, ..... the subject of inquiry in determining the validity of a statute. an unconstitutional reason or intention is an impracticable suggestion which cannot be applied to the affairs of life. if the act done by the state is legal, is not in violation of the constitution or laws of the united states, it is quite out of the power of any ..... resort to all the courts of the country, to invoke the protection which all the laws and all the courts may afford him, and that he cannot barter away his life, his freedom, or his constitutional rights. as to the effect of the statutory requirement of the agreement, the opinion, at page 87 u. s. 458 of the case .....

Orleans Vs. Platt

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of miami county, 2 black 722; knox v. aspinwall, 21 how. 539; the royal british bank v. turquand, 6 el. & bl. 325. a corporation is liable for the acts of its servants while engaged in the business of their employment, to the same extent that individuals are liable under like circumstances. philadelphia, wilmington, & baltimore railroad co ..... dispatch." they were not parties to the proceedings upon the certiorari, and hence were not directly affected by them. the same remarks apply to the corporation that received the bonds in payment for its stock. it is expressly provided by statute that in case of disagreement of the commissioners touching the issuing ..... . v. quigley, 21 how. 209; greene v. london omnibus co., 8 c.b.n.s. 290; the life and fire insurance co. v. mechanics' fire insurance co. .....