Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: legal services authorities amendment act 2002 section 6 amendment of section 27 Court: jharkhand Page 5 of about 130 results (0.129 seconds)

Sep 03 2003 (HC)

Siddhu Kanhu University Etc. Vs. Dr. Arjun Prasad Sinha and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR1(Jhr)]

..... reasoning that the commission had no jurisdiction after the appointed day; that notwithstanding the adaptation/ amendment of the bihar university act, the service commission has power to recommend for appointments in the universities now within the state of jharkhand and the recommendations had to be dealt with in accordance with section 58(3) of the bihar universities act (now jharkhand universities act) and the reason for not acting upon the recommendation of the service commission was not legal and valid. ..... from the chancellor; for a direction to the chancellor and to the siddhu kanhu university, to immediately appoint the petitioner to the post of registrar, siddhu kanhu university based on the recommendation made by the service commission as contained in its letter dated 16,3.2002 with all consequential benefits and for a direction to the chanccellor and the university to produce a copy of the minutes of the meeting held on 17.8.2001 referred to in the letter dated 5.10.2001 issued ..... university had withdrawn its request or requisition and on such withdrawal, the service commission had no further authority to continue the process of selection or to go through the process of selection and to make a recommendation and that the right of the state of jharkhand to make its own selection cannot be questioned and cannot be circumscribed by resort to the provisions in the university act or the service commission act and in this situation, the writ petitioner was not entitled to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2007 (HC)

Sanjay Vishwakarma @ Sanjay Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1466; [2008(2)JCR388(Jhr)]

..... ), the supreme court has ruled that the employee after being selected in accordance with the service rules before the amended rule, his right cannot be taken away by giving retrospective effect to the subsequently amended rule. ..... by letter dated 3rd october, 2003, roster was also approved by the concerned authority some of the persons, who had applied for class iv post, had moved this court in w.p.(s) ..... the petitioners made several representations before the concerned authority requesting them to issue appropriate order, but the same are not heeded upon and no order has been ..... the said writ petition was disposed of by order dated 10th april, 2002 directing the respondents to complete the process of selection within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the ..... the provision of the subsequently amended rule cannot be applied to the petitioners by giving retrospective effect to ..... the amended rule, which has been made applicable with retrospective effect, cannot be applied in the process of the appointment, which was started and almost concluded for before coming into existence of the amended ..... : [2002]supp3scr306 , it has been held that the rights acquired by employees are legally protected rights and cannot be withdrawn even by the legislature with retrospective ..... relevant recruitment rules so indicate, the state is under no legal duty to fill up all or any of the vacancies ..... has been also observed that the state, however, has no license of acting in an arbitrary manner. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2016 (HC)

Kumar Pankaj Anand Vs. Central University of Jharkhand Through Its Reg ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... university of jharkhand pertaining to discharge the petitioners from services with effect from 14.09.2013, and for issuance of writ/directions commanding upon the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioners on their original posts and also for issuance of writ/direction to declare that so called notification dated 05.08.2013 issued in purported compliance of amended statute 11 of the central universities act, 2009 having no legal enforceability because of non publication of the official gazette as required under section 43 of the central universities ..... (1) where there is an allegation of misconduct against a teacher, a member of the academic staff or other employee of the university, the vice chancellor, in the case of the teacher or a member of the academic staff, and the authority competent to appoint (hereinafter referred to as the appointing authority) in the case of other employee may, by order in writing, place such teacher, member of the academic staff or other employee, as the case may be, under suspension and shall forthwith report to the executive council ..... indrajeet sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the judgment cited by the respondent-university reported in (1999) 2 scc22 (radhe shyam gupta vs up state agro industries), (2002) 1 scc520(pavenendra narayan verma vs. ..... reported in [(2002) 1 scc520 has been referred to: 33. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2016 (HC)

Sandeep Kumar Vs. Central University of Jharkhand Through Its Registra ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... university of jharkhand pertaining to discharge the petitioners from services with effect from 14.09.2013, and for issuance of writ/directions commanding upon the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioners on their original posts and also for issuance of writ/direction to declare that so called notification dated 05.08.2013 issued in purported compliance of amended statute 11 of the central universities act, 2009 having no legal enforceability because of non publication of the official gazette as required under section 43 of the central universities ..... (1) where there is an allegation of misconduct against a teacher, a member of the academic staff or other employee of the university, the vice chancellor, in the case of the teacher or a member of the academic staff, and the authority competent to appoint (hereinafter referred to as the appointing authority) in the case of other employee may, by order in writing, place such teacher, member of the academic staff or other employee, as the case may be, under suspension and shall forthwith report to the executive council ..... indrajeet sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the judgment cited by the respondent-university reported in (1999) 2 scc22 (radhe shyam gupta vs up state agro industries), (2002) 1 scc520(pavenendra narayan verma vs. ..... reported in [(2002) 1 scc520 has been referred to: 33. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2016 (HC)

Dinu Kumar Pandey Vs. The Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the provisions envisaged in rule 17 of bsf (amendment) rules, 2011, any person, who has become subject to the act, by furnishing false or incorrect information at the time of appointment or enrollment, may be dismissed or removed from service by the appointing authority after giving him an opportunity to show cause against ..... counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents to the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner has also been filed by the respondents, wherein under rule 17 chapter iv of the bsf (amendment) rule 2011, the rules pertaining to termination of service of an employee on the grounds of furnishing false or incorrect information at the time of appointment or enrollment has been given vide annexure-d to the counter affidavit to the supplementary ..... become subject to the act, by furnishing false or incorrect information or by adopting any fraudulent means, may be dismissed or removed from service by the central government or any other officer not below the rank of the appointing authority, as the case may ..... 04.10.2012 without any pensionary benefits because of furnishing false information at the time of his enrollment and after dismissal from service, the petitioner has submitted petitions dated 06.10.2012 and 15.10.2012 to the inspector general, bsf, hq bangalore ftr (spl ops), bangalore and the dg, bsf, new delhi respectively ..... 03.08.2006 was filed against the petitioner under sections 341, 323, 448, 379, 504 and ..... such a case the legal maxim nullus commodum capere .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2017 (HC)

Mohan Murari Singh and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... 3235 of 2014, 3139 of 2015, 3182 of 2015, 3242 of 2015 and 3563 of 2015 procedure for appointment through both the sources, and laid the responsibility upon the appointing authority to identify the posts separately, falling vacant each year to be filled from both the sources, and sending the same to the director, panchayat raj, for initiating the process of appointment through ..... of the selected candidates and has submitted that the said letter cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, in as much as, the process of selection of the petitioners had been completed in accordance with 2002 rules, much prior to coming into force of 2014 rules and accordingly, even if 2014 rules were promulgated in the mean time, their appointment process could not have been affected by the promulgation of the subsequent ..... doubt true that the rule-making authority under arti- cle 309 of the constitution and section 39 of the act is the same, namely, the government (to be precise, the governor, under article 309 and the government under section 39), but the two jurisdictions are ..... services had been specially established under an act of the legislature and the govern- ment, in pursuance of the power conferred upon it under that act, has already made service rules, any amendment in the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 would not affect the spe- cial provisions validly made for the fire services ..... the above legal position has not been seriously disputed by the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2017 (HC)

Ajay Kumar Gope Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... 3235 of 2014, 3139 of 2015, 3182 of 2015, 3242 of 2015 and 3563 of 2015 procedure for appointment through both the sources, and laid the responsibility upon the appointing authority to identify the posts separately, falling vacant each year to be filled from both the sources, and sending the same to the director, panchayat raj, for initiating the process of appointment through ..... of the selected candidates and has submitted that the said letter cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, in as much as, the process of selection of the petitioners had been completed in accordance with 2002 rules, much prior to coming into force of 2014 rules and accordingly, even if 2014 rules were promulgated in the mean time, their appointment process could not have been affected by the promulgation of the subsequent ..... doubt true that the rule-making authority under arti- cle 309 of the constitution and section 39 of the act is the same, namely, the government (to be precise, the governor, under article 309 and the government under section 39), but the two jurisdictions are ..... services had been specially established under an act of the legislature and the govern- ment, in pursuance of the power conferred upon it under that act, has already made service rules, any amendment in the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 would not affect the spe- cial provisions validly made for the fire services ..... the above legal position has not been seriously disputed by the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2017 (HC)

Jharkhand Rajya Gram Raksha Dal Through Its General Secretary Sanjay K ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... 3235 of 2014, 3139 of 2015, 3182 of 2015, 3242 of 2015 and 3563 of 2015 procedure for appointment through both the sources, and laid the responsibility upon the appointing authority to identify the posts separately, falling vacant each year to be filled from both the sources, and sending the same to the director, panchayat raj, for initiating the process of appointment through ..... of the selected candidates and has submitted that the said letter cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, in as much as, the process of selection of the petitioners had been completed in accordance with 2002 rules, much prior to coming into force of 2014 rules and accordingly, even if 2014 rules were promulgated in the mean time, their appointment process could not have been affected by the promulgation of the subsequent ..... doubt true that the rule-making authority under arti- cle 309 of the constitution and section 39 of the act is the same, namely, the government (to be precise, the governor, under article 309 and the government under section 39), but the two jurisdictions are ..... services had been specially established under an act of the legislature and the govern- ment, in pursuance of the power conferred upon it under that act, has already made service rules, any amendment in the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 would not affect the spe- cial provisions validly made for the fire services ..... the above legal position has not been seriously disputed by the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2017 (HC)

Manash Kumar Tripathy and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... 3235 of 2014, 3139 of 2015, 3182 of 2015, 3242 of 2015 and 3563 of 2015 procedure for appointment through both the sources, and laid the responsibility upon the appointing authority to identify the posts separately, falling vacant each year to be filled from both the sources, and sending the same to the director, panchayat raj, for initiating the process of appointment through ..... of the selected candidates and has submitted that the said letter cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, in as much as, the process of selection of the petitioners had been completed in accordance with 2002 rules, much prior to coming into force of 2014 rules and accordingly, even if 2014 rules were promulgated in the mean time, their appointment process could not have been affected by the promulgation of the subsequent ..... doubt true that the rule-making authority under arti- cle 309 of the constitution and section 39 of the act is the same, namely, the government (to be precise, the governor, under article 309 and the government under section 39), but the two jurisdictions are ..... services had been specially established under an act of the legislature and the govern- ment, in pursuance of the power conferred upon it under that act, has already made service rules, any amendment in the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 would not affect the spe- cial provisions validly made for the fire services ..... the above legal position has not been seriously disputed by the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2017 (HC)

Mohan Lal Bhagat and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... 3235 of 2014, 3139 of 2015, 3182 of 2015, 3242 of 2015 and 3563 of 2015 procedure for appointment through both the sources, and laid the responsibility upon the appointing authority to identify the posts separately, falling vacant each year to be filled from both the sources, and sending the same to the director, panchayat raj, for initiating the process of appointment through ..... of the selected candidates and has submitted that the said letter cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, in as much as, the process of selection of the petitioners had been completed in accordance with 2002 rules, much prior to coming into force of 2014 rules and accordingly, even if 2014 rules were promulgated in the mean time, their appointment process could not have been affected by the promulgation of the subsequent ..... doubt true that the rule-making authority under arti- cle 309 of the constitution and section 39 of the act is the same, namely, the government (to be precise, the governor, under article 309 and the government under section 39), but the two jurisdictions are ..... services had been specially established under an act of the legislature and the govern- ment, in pursuance of the power conferred upon it under that act, has already made service rules, any amendment in the karnataka civil services (general recruitment) rules, 1977 would not affect the spe- cial provisions validly made for the fire services ..... the above legal position has not been seriously disputed by the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //