Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 5 general effect of vesting Court: us supreme court Page 1 of about 41 results (0.846 seconds)

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

..... after 10:45 pm on november 26, 2008. the explosion destroyed the vehicle and instantly killed its two occupants (the driver and a passenger).256. the explosion was witnessed by shyamsunder rambharat choudhary (pw-171), balkrushna ramchandra bare (pw-490) and sheldon alman (pw-491). as ..... nokia devices:1. nokia 1200, imei # 353526024049451 2. nokia 1200, imei # 353526025828739manufactured: dongguan, china manufactured: dongguan, chinadate shipped: june 28, 2008 date shipped: june 26, 2008country shipped to: pakistan country shipped to: pakistan vendor product sold to: united mobile vendor product sold to: i2 pakistan (pvt.) ltd.3. nokia 1200, ..... imei # 353526025842235 4. nokia 1200, imei # 353526025840890manufactured: dongguan, china manufactured: dongguan, china date shipped: june 26, 2008 date shipped: june 26, 2008 country shipped to: pakistan country shipped to: pakistan vendor product sold to: i2 pakistan (pvt.) ltd. vendor product sold to: i2 pakistan (pvt.) ltd.5. .....

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... compensation and make adequate provisions for rehabilitation and resettlement mechanism for the affected persons and their families. the bill thus provides for repealing and replacing the land acquisition act, la with broad provisions for adequate rehabilitation and resettlement mechanism for the project affected persons and their families.6. provision of public facilities or infrastructure ..... do not suggest the same. on the contrary, the decisions of this court operating in the field beginning from shetty s constructions co. (p) ltd. v. konkan rly. construction, (1998) 5 scc599are ad idem to the effect that section 21 must be taken recourse to for the purpose of interpretation of section 85(2)(a ..... impossibility of performance is a good excuse. thus in a case in which 204 2002 (5) scc54271 consignees of a cargo were prevented from unloading a ship promptly by reason of a dock strike, the court, after holding that in the absence of an express agreement to unload in a specified time there was .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... three other words in association with which it is used. 'transfer' therefore, according to the learned counsel, means a voluntary transfer and cannot include all compulsory acquisition of property.we find it impossible to accept the submission. in the first place if it was intended that voluntary transfers alone should fall within the meaning of ..... who has a genuine grievance because an order has been made which prejudicially affects his interests. has the attorney-general a sufficient interest for this purpose their lord-ships think that he has. the attorney-general in a colony represents the crown as the guardian of the public interest. it is his duty to bring before ..... court who may be moved on occasions by petty considerations such as communalism and favouritism or who may even be capricious in proposing names of persons for judge-ship. the chief justice of india will naturally be able to assess the qualities of persons proposed having in view the standard of efficiency of judges in all .....

Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases

Court : US Supreme Court

..... other "uniform" provisions of the constitution. the head money cases, 112 u. s. 580 (1884), involved the levy on ships' agents or owners of a 50-cent tax for any passenger not a united states citizen who entered an american port from a foreign port "by steam or sail vessel." individuals engaged ..... ], is authorized to enter into agreements with railroads in reorganization in the region (or railroads leased, operated, or controlled by railroads in reorganization) for the acquisition, maintenance, or improvement of railroad facilities and equipment necessary to improve property that will be in the final system plan. agreements entered into pursuant to this ..... noted: "the obligational authority of the association is limited to $150,000,000 to finance the secretary's agreements with railroads in reorganization for the acquisition, maintenance and improvement of rail facilities prior to the completion of the final system plan. under the bill, any additional obligation authority necessary for the .....

Passenger Corp. Vs. Passengers Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of powers was designed to provide not for judicial supremacy, but for checks and balances. when we turn back this respondent, we turn back passengers who are the victims of the present transportation debacle. those who complain are not adventurers who seek personal aggrandizement as do jackals who historically have ..... on the merits. [ footnote 11 ] the amtrak act was, in significant part, a response to congressional dissatisfaction with the administrative delays inherent in passenger route discontinuances under existing legislation. as the senate report observed, "trains which clearly served no useful purpose were either required to be kept in operation ..... myriad of possible plaintiffs, the potential would exist for a barrage of lawsuits that, either individually or collectively, could frustrate or severely delay any proposed passenger train discontinuance. even if one court eventually upheld the discontinuance, its judgment would not control a suit brought in another district, and would not, .....

Cannon Vs. University of Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

..... v. ash, supra, ("unlawful" conduct); securities investor protection corp. v. barbour, 421 u. s. 412 (duty of sipc to "discharge its obligations"); national railroad passenger corp. v. national assn. of railroad passengers, 414 u. s. 453 (forbidding "action, practice, or policy inconsistent" with the amtrak act); wheeldin v. wheeler, 373 u. s. 647 (setting procedure for ..... ? second, is there any indication of legislative intent, explicit or implicit, either to create such a remedy or to deny one? see, e.g., national railroad passenger corp. v. national assn. of railroad passengers, 414 u. s. 453 , 414 u. s. 458 , 414 u. s. 460 (1974) ( amtrak ). third, is it consistent with the underlying ..... approach since 1972 to cause of action by implication has not gone without scholarly notice. e.g., pitt, standing to sue under the williams act after chris-craft: a leaky ship on troubled waters, 34 bus.law. 117, 120, 162 (1978). [ footnote 25 ] section 718, 86 stat. 369, is codified in 20 u.s.c. .....

United States Vs. Winstar Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... high rollers: inside the savings and loan debacle 37 (1991) (lowy). instead, the principal inducement for these supervisory mergers was an understanding that the acquisitions would be subject to a particular accounting treatment that would help the acquiring institutions meet their reserve capital requirements imposed by federal regulations. see investigation of lincoln ..... . id., at 272. when the city later passed an ordinance amending the license tax and imposing an additional tax based on the number of passengers riding each car, the railway companies challenged that amendment as a violation of the contracts clause. the court there said that such a governmental power ..... 3) the fair inference from the circumstances is that if the environmental legislation occurs and prevents shipment, a private seller would incur liability for failure to ship on time. under ordinary principles of contract law, one would construe the contract in terms of the parties' intent, as revealed by language and .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and disadvantage. in short, there is no empirical data to demonstrate that any one race is more selflessly socially oriented or by contrast that another is more selfishly acquisitive." 18 cal.3d at 56, 553 p.2d at 1167. petitioner simply has not carried its burden of demonstrating that it must prefer members of particular ethnic ..... harlan were soon to be realized. in the wake of plessy, many states expanded their jim crow laws, which had, up until that time, been limited primarily to passenger trains and schools. the segregation of the races was extended to residential areas, parks, hospitals, theaters, waiting rooms, and bathrooms. there were even statutes and ordinances which ..... printed a parody of jim crow laws: "'if there must be jim crow cars on the railroads, there should be jim crow cars on the street railways. also on all passenger boats. . . . if there are to be jim crow cars, moreover, there should be jim crow waiting saloons at all stations, and jim crow eating houses. . . . .....

United States Vs. Sharpe

Court : US Supreme Court

..... on the highway in tandem with a blue pontiac bonneville. respondent savage was driving the pickup, and respondent sharpe was driving the pontiac. the pontiac also carried a passenger, davis, the charges against whom were later dropped. observing that the truck was riding low in the rear and that the camper did not bounce or sway appreciably ..... validity of the warrantless search and seizure of the burlap-covered bales removed from the truck driven by savage. justice brennan, dissenting. the respondent william sharpe and his passenger were pulled over to the side of the highway, concededly without probable cause, and held for more than 30 minutes, much of that time in the back seat ..... v. amick, supra, at 145, 111 cal.rptr. at 283 ("[the police] had a right to and did assume that, at that time, [the driver and his passengers] knew law enforcement officials wanted to talk to them; and upon being pursued by the black and white unit and officer kapphahn with red spotlight and siren there could be .....

Ohralik Vs. Ohio State Bar Assn.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... concealed under his raincoat before arriving at the mcclintocks' residence. once there, he reexamined their automobile insurance policy, discussed with them the law applicable to passengers, and explained the consequences of the fact that the driver who struck carol's car was an uninsured motorist. appellant discovered that the mcclintocks' insurance policy ..... explained that their daughter had been driving the family automobile on a local road when she was hit by an uninsured motorist. both carol and her passenger, wanda lou holbert, were injured and hospitalized. in response to the mcclintocks' expression of apprehension that they might be sued by holbert, appellant explained that ..... the accident victim in her hospital room, where she signed a contingent fee agreement. in the meantime, appellant approached the driver's 18-year-old female passenger -- who also had been injured -- at her home on the day she was released from the hospital; she agreed orally to a contingent fee arrangement. .....