Court : Mumbai
Reported in : II(2001)ACC139; 2002ACJ85; 2001(2)ALLMR75; 2001(3)BomCR269
..... filed separate written statement and denied claimants allegations made in the claim petition. the opponent no. 5 also set up the defence that the deceased was unauthorised and gratuitous passenger travelling in the truck and he was not covered under the insurance policy. the opponent no. 5 insurer also submitted that opponent no. 4 driver was not holding ..... leak each applied a naked light to a gas pipe in turn and one of them caused an explosion, they were held to be joint tortfeasors but where two ships collided because of the independent acts of negligence of each of them, and one of them, without further negligence, collided with a third, it was held that ..... extra premium having been paid, the owner of a goods vehicles can claim indemnification from the insurer just because once in a year the goods vehicle had carried a passenger for hire or reward along with the goods. this would perhaps robe the third proviso dealing with coverage of contractual liability lame. 22. thus, to find out .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1997)139CTR(Guj)428; [1997]226ITR781(Guj)
..... (annexure 'e' to the petition) and has submitted that the gold as aforesaid can also be brought as a carrier. it is hardly relevant whether the gold belonged to the passenger or not. according to him, the action of the it authorities is contrary to the above referred gold import scheme. once the gold has been brought in accordance with the .....
Tag this Judgment!