Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 14 penalties Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 39 results (4.369 seconds)

Sep 30 1997 (HC)

Mukesh and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ2439

..... section 3(2) (a) to (g), excepting clauses (h) or (i), for regulating by licenses, permits or otherwise, the production or manufacture, storage, transport, distribution, disposal, acquisition, use or consumption or control of price, of an essential commodity, in respect of which an offence punishable under section 7(l)((a)(ii) is committed, the accused further commits ..... a di rectory one. if, however, a provision of law requires that a certain act is to be done in a particular manner by a person for acquisition of a right and at the same time another provision in the statute confers an immunity upon another person if that act is not done in the prescribed manner ..... obligation under article 227 of the constitutional obligation duty under section 483, cr. p.c. i sincerely feel that before it is too late and we see the ship carrying the socio-economic and peoples welfare legislations' luggage sinking in the deep waters under the load of un-ending de-novo trials of offences under. such enactments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2001 (HC)

East India Hotels Ltd. and Another Vs. the State of Rajasthan and Othe ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC62

..... (l)(b)-' is acquired by transfer or otherwise' and explanation, 'acquired by transfer or otherwise' used in clause (b) of this sub-section shall not include acquisition by inheritance.' '15 (b) any change having taken place in the ownership of the land or building; except by way of inheritance or', are declared ultra vires ..... which reads 'is acquired, by transfer or otherwise' alongwith explanation 'acquired by transfer or otherwise, used in clause (b) of this sub-section shall not include acquisition by inheritance', and section 15(b), which reads 'any change having taken place in the ownership of the land or building; except by way of inheritance' are ..... enlarged portion is occupied, whichever is earlier. explanation-the expression 'acquired by transfer or otherwise' used in clause (b) of this sub-section shall not include acquisition by inheritance. (2) such owner shall, within ninety days of the commencement of the year in respect of which he first becomes liable to pay tax under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1976 (HC)

Banshidhar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1977Raj46

..... a liability imposed under section 30-e (2) on the land-holders to surrender their surplus lands within six months of the notified date or three months of the acquisition. the state acquired a corresponding right to enforce that liability. the landholders filed in their returns in form iv claiming that they were entitled to retain lands in excess ..... period of six months and if he has acquired the land after the act came into force then to surrender that land within three months from the date of the acquisition and to place it at the disposal of the tahsildar. the penal consequences have been provided under sub-section (3). any person failing intentionally to make report or ..... clauses act.16. it will be relevant to reproduce here the section 30-e of the old law:--'30-e -- maximum land that can be held and restriction on future acquisitions - (1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act or in any other law for the time being in force, no person shall, as from a date notified by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2000 (HC)

D.P. Metals Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2001]121STC311(Raj); 2001(4)WLC115; 2000(3)WLN445

..... it would be necessary not only to show that the source of money has not been explained but also to show the existence of some material to indicate that the acquisition of money by the assessee has resulted from transactions liable to sales tax and not from other sources.'29. in sodhi transport co. v. state of u.p. : [1986]1scr939 ..... the account books. the supreme court reversed the judgment and held :'the approach which may be permissible for imposing liability for payment of income-tax in respect of the unexplained acquisition of money may not hold good in sales tax cases. for the purpose of income-tax it may in appropriate cases be permissible to treat unexplained ..... acquisition of money by the assessee to be the assessee's income from undisclosed sources and assess him as such, as against that, for the purpose of levy of sales tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1992 (HC)

Vijai Singh Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1038Raj; 1993(1)WLC577

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition has been made to an order dated April 8, 1983 (Annexure-4) passed by the Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Ajmer for termination of the service of petitioner on the basis of departmental inquiry held against him. 2. The facts of the case lie in a very narrow compass. The petitioner who was serving as a conductor in the service of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation') was suspended on July 9, 1982. A charge sheet dated July 9, 1982 was served upon him for a departmental inquiry. By an order dated August 20, 1982 of the Regional Manager, Ajmer, Regional Depot Manager was appointed as Inquiry Officer. Inquiry proceedings were fixed on September 21, 1982, October 7, 1982, October 20, 1982, November 6, 1982, November 19, 1982, December 10, 1982, December 23, 1982, January 17, 1983, February 4, 1983 and February 14, 1983. The petitioner attended the inquiry on February 14, 19...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 1976 (HC)

Automobiles Transport (Rajasthan) Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dewalal and o ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1977Raj121

..... fallacy that the provisions of the act require that the owner of a vehicle cannot use the vehicle unless it is registered under the act or cannot carry passengers or goods in the vehicle unless a permit in that respect is obtained by the owner and which led to the conclusion that it is only the ostensible ..... before the lower court. mow the appellants want to produce certain assessment orders of one firm m/s. mangalchand gograj of the income-tax department and also of the passenger and goods tax authorities and commercial taxes officers. they also want to file the balance-sheet of the automobile transport (rajasthan) private limited company and some ledger and ..... against the side wall which save way and the vehicle then over-turned and fell down.3. one of the consequences of the accident was that one dharamchand a passenger sustained fatal injuries and died instantaneously on the spot. his widow, three minor children and his parents filed a claim petition in the aforesaid tribunal on july 30, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1994 (HC)

Santu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1994Raj213

..... can only be allotted land. in the latter case the allotment is further subject to condition that he does not hold more than 30 standard acre of land after such acquisition. no member of family of such pong dam oustee is eligible for separate allotment, even if land of such member has been separately acquired. regarding allotment price of such land .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1973 (HC)

Sitaram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN917

..... he provision of an efficient, adequate, economical and properly co-ordinated system of road transport services in the state. section 40 makes provision for compensation for acquisition of road transport undertakings, but there is no section which makes it obligatory for the corporation to acquire the assets of the private operators section 40 ..... bux, if genuine, could be removed by the regional transport authority by an appropriate order. shri munshi took the stand that no other bus laden with passengers can enter the road covered by the nationalised route at all. he emphasised the words 'no private operator shall ply any stage carriage or contract carriage ..... 1939) and in pursuance of rules 3 and 4 of the rajasthan state road transport service (development) riles, 1965, the scheme hereto annexed in respect of passenger road transport services to be run and operated by state transport undertaking is hereby published.any person whose interests are affected by scheme may within thirty days ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1960 (HC)

Manka Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1961CriLJ406

..... right to acquire, hold and dispose of property and to practise any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. gold is a commodity which is capable of acquisition. trading in gold is also not prohibited. the aforesaid section makes it well nigh impossible for a citizen to exercise these rights on account of the heavy burden that is ..... . in frailey v. charlton (1920) 1 kb 147 the export of soap had been prohibited by royal proclamation. the respondent, a ship's steward, had on board his ship thirty tablets of soap which was intended for the use of passengers on the voyage. the respondent was not aware of the fact of prohibition. it was held that his ignorance of the prohibition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1984 (HC)

Bhanwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj

..... 15th april, 1981 and it was reported to be a clear case of sabotage. the aircraft could have crashed during flights endangering the life of the prime minister and other passengers. the above grievance and serious nature of the finding finds place in para 3 of the judgment and, that led to losing of confidence of the suitability of the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //