Court : Orissa
Decided on : Feb-17-1989
Reported in : AIR1989Ori173; 68(1989)CLT65
A.K. Padhi, J.1. Both the writ applications were taken up together for hearing at the points of law are the same. We propose to dispose of them by this judgment.2. In O.J.C. No. 2745 of 1988 Ambika Prasad Mohanty (a minor boy represented through his father) is the petitioner. He has stated that in pursuance to the prospectus issued by opp. party No. 1 (Orissa Engineering College) he applied for admission to 4 years B.Sc. Engineering Course in civil engineering for the academic session 1988-89. After interview, the petitioner was duly selected and intimated to take admission in the College. He deposited the requisite fees etc. of the College to the tune of Rs. 20,585.00 and was admitted to the College vide Annexures 1 and 4 which is not in dispute. After being admitted he received a letter of cancellationof his admission vide Annexure 2, dt. 16-8-1988. Annexure 2 reads as follows :-- 'On scrutiny it has now been detected that your application was earlier rejected for various defects not...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : May-11-1989
Reported in : (1992)ILLJ23Ori
V. Gopalaswamy, J. 1. The petitioner Agro-Industries Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') has filed this writ application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the award dated November 11, 1987 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhubaneswar, in I..D. Case No. 116 of 1987 directing the reinstatement of opposite party No. 1 with half of the back wages till the date of the award.2. The facts giving rise to the writ application may be briefly stated as follows:During the relevant period opposite party No. 1 Bhimsen Maharana was serving as a storekeeper in the Central Agro-Store of the Corporation attached to the Office of the Regional Manager (Central) Industrial Estate, Cuttack. As such store-keeper, the opposite party No. 1 Bhimsen Maharana used to deal with the sale of various agro implements and spare parts. On January 6, 1976 the opposite party No. 1 sold from the said store to a customer two articles, namely, one power ...
Tag this Judgment!