Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 14 penalties Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 13 results (0.078 seconds)

Ashok Gyanchand Vohra Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1270; 2006(3)MhLj163

V.G. Palshikar, Acg. C.J.1. The above writ petitions were heard by us and the judgment was reserved. Then I prepared the judgment of the Bench in November, 2005 and circulated it to my learned colleagues on the Bench. However to my dismay, I was informed by both my colleagues that they do not agree with the view taken by me on the presumption that they agree with me. I then read the majority view rendered by Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale. Having given my anxious consideration to the views expressed I found it impossible to agree with the majority view. Hence this opinion.2. I regret my incapacity to convince my learned colleagues to the view that I propagated. In my humble opinion, the majority view has the result of virtually destroying the safeguards provided under the MCOC Act. The majority view reads several things into the Act which are not legislated. It has the effect of permitting the Special Court under the Act not only to take cognizance of private complaint alleging comm...

Shri Vijay C. Puljal Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR481; (2005)107BOMLR983; [2005]128CompCas196(Bom); 2005(4)CTC705; 2005(4)MhLj5; [2005]64SCL589(Bom)

..... as its business or part thereof any of the activities stipulated therein. the activities which are included are, inter alia, the financing of any activity other than its own; the acquisition of shares, stock, bonds, debentures or securities issued by a government or local authority; letting or delivering of any goods to a hirer under a hire-purchase agreement; insurance business .....

Walchandnagar Industries Limited (Engineering and Foundary Division) V ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR733; (2005)107BOMLR942; (2006)IILLJ834Bom

..... cylinder diesel engine for want of sustained business considerably reduced in mid-1983. therefore, plans were drawn for manufacture of sophisticated 1200 cc light weight, fuel efficient diesel engine for passenger cars and a collaboration agreement was signed with m/s. technoliccence, u.k. for manufacture of light weight, advanced 4 cylinder diesel engine of m/s. fratelli negri machine diesel .....

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hoganas I ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR61; 2006(199)ELT8(Bom)

..... aforesaid farm, only contemplates four items. a perusal of the said form and the annexure, indicates that what is sought is the information regarding the bill of entry/shipping bill, details regarding additional amount of duty disclosed and accepted to be payable and the full and true disclosure of the facts regarding the issues to be settled including ..... there is reasonable belief that it is liable to be confiscated. clause 6 of the aforesaid form provides for such particulars as be details of bill of entry/shipping bill filed in relation to the case for settlement. under clause 10, the said form provides for the brief facts of the case and particulars of the issued ..... excise duty accepted to be payable by him. it also provides that such an application will be accepted only where the applicant has filed a bill of entry or shipping bill under the customs act, 1962. only cases where show cause notice or demand notice for recovery of duty has been received by the applicant will be entertained. .....

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... historical cost means the sum of the expenditure directly or indirectly incurred in bringing an article to its existing condition and location. this may be expressed shortly as "acquisition and production cost". that cost can be adjusted only by the realized or realizable value and not by periodic returns, such as interests, dividends, rentals and other ..... ltd., 75 itr 191 (sc), the learned assessing officer held that dividend received in respect of shares purchased on cum-dividend basis would reduce the cost of acquisition in the hands of the purchaser. following the ratio of the aforesaid supreme court judgment, the learned assessing officer calculated the loss arising to the assessee in the ..... of law merely by describing an agreement in a particular form though in essence and in substance it may be a different transaction."union of india v. gosalia shipping p. ltd. , hon'ble supreme court held, "it is true that one could not place over-reliance on the form which the parties give to their .....

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

..... historical cost means the sum of the expenditure directly or indirectly incurred in bringing an article to its existing condition and location. this may be expressed shortly as "acquisition and production cost". that cost can be adjusted only by the realized or realizable value and not by periodic returns, such as interests, dividends, rentals and other ..... ltd., 75 itr 191 (sc), the learned assessing officer held that dividend received in respect of shares purchased on cum-dividend basis would reduce the cost of acquisition in the hands of the purchaser. following the ratio of the aforesaid supreme court judgment, the learned assessing officer calculated the loss arising to the assessee in ..... of law merely by describing an agreement in a particular form though in essence and in substance it may be a different transaction."union of india v. gosalia shipping p. ltd. (1978) 113 itr 307(sc), honble supreme court held, "it is true that one could not place over-reliance on the form which .....

Ms. Mina Fusade, Legal Heir of the Late Prince Sayajirao Gaekwar Vs. M ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR1160; (2006)201CTR(Bom)207; [2006]285ITR229(Bom)

V.C. Daga, J.1. The petitioner in this petition seeks to challenge action of respondent No. 1 rejecting the declaration made by the Petitioner under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 ('KVS Scheme' for short) in respect of tax arrears of late Prince Sayajirao Gaekwar under Wealth Tax Act, 1957 ('Act' for short) for the assessment years 1969-70 to 1978-79; 1981-82; and 1984-85 to 1986-87 contending that the order of rejection suffers from non-application of mind and is contrary to the provisions of KVS Scheme.Factual Scenario:2. The factual scenario giving rise to the present petition in nutshell is as under:3. The petitioner is a legal heir of deceased Prince Sayajirao Gaekwar (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased' for short), who died in France on or about 7th of May, 1985. The petitioner is a non-resident, being a citizen of the United Kingdom, presently residing in Monaco in the South of France.4. The respondent No. 1 is the Commissioner of Income-tax, who is the designated authori...

Anil Kushabrao Phutane Vs. Madhukar Kushabrao Phutane and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2006Bom1; 2006(1)ALLMR555; 2006(1)BomCR786; 2006(1)MhLj369

P.S. Brahme, J. 1. Heard Mr. K.R. Lambat, Adv. for the appellant.2. Admit.3. Mrs. B. H. Dangre, Adv. waives notice on behalf of the respondents.4. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties by consent for final disposal.5. The order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 4597 of 2004, dated 9-12-2004 is subject-matter of challenge in this appeal. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellant, thereby confirming the order passed by the trial Court, dt. 20-7-2004 on the application (Exh.31) in Special Civil Suit No. 78 of 2003 rejecting the application seeking permission to file written statement.6. The learned trial Court and the learned Single Judge found that the mandate in the time schedule prescribed in Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (in short, 'the Amendment Act, 2002') does not permit to accept the written statement filed be...

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Through Divisional Traffi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR340; (2005)107BOMLR251; (2006)IILLJ283Bom; 2005(4)MhLj798

..... in various complaints above referred to, were employed by the corporation in various depots of the corporation for cleaning st buses. they are doing the work of sweeping, cleaning the passenger buses. they are also cleaning and washing rams and they are to see that the car washers and water pumps are working properly. they are equally cleaning the area near .....

Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (Cs) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Akaljot Singh Sekh ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj797

..... of these facts, the apex court in paragraph 16 has observed thus :--'16. it is clear from the language of the section, as interpreted by the constitution bench judgment in konkan railway (supra) that if there is any objection as to the applicability of the arbitration clause to the facts of the case, the same will have to be raised before .....