Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 14 penalties Court: appellate tribunal for foreign exchange new delhi Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.183 seconds)

Dec 16 2008 (TRI)

Directorate of Enforcement Vs. M.D. Ruparel and Sons

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Dec-16-2008

..... trade or business, if any, with respect to such instrument, and the fact of the particular case. the reasonable time which a passenger is entitled to alighting from a train is such time as is usually required by passengers in getting off and on the train in safety at the particular station in question. a reasonable time, looking at all the circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2008 (TRI)

Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Saketh India Ltd.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Jun-12-2008

..... trade or business, if any, with respect to such instrument, and the fact of the particular case the reasonable time which a passenger is entitled to alighting from a train is such time as is usually required by passengers in getting off and on the train in safety at the particular station in question. a reasonable time, looking at all the circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2008 (TRI)

Shekhar Goel Vs. Enforcement Directorate

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2008

1and 2. These appeals with identical facts are filed against following two adjudication orders as recorded below : (1) Appeal No. 228/06 and appeal No. 230/06 - against Adjudication Order No. SDE/SKP/III/12/2006, dated 4-4-2006 passed by Special Director, Enforcement Directorate imposing total penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs (Rs. 5 lakhs each) on Shekhar Goel (the individual appellant) for contravention of sections 8(1) 9(1)(a), 8(1) read with section 64(2) of FER Act, 1973 respectively and total penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs (Rs. 5 lakhs + Rs. 5 lakhs) on M/s. American Express Bank Ltd. (the appellant bank) for contravention of sections 6(4) and 6(5) read with sections 73(3), 49 of FER Act, 1973 and also refer para 29B, 8(c) of ECM 1987 and section 9(1)(c) of FER Act, 1973 respectively besides imposing separate penalties on other co-noticees who are not parties in any of these appeals. (2) Appeal No. 531/05 against Adjudication Order No. Adj/142/DZ/ 2004/AD(SMB), dated 28-2-2005 passed by Assistant...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //