Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 14 penalties Court: allahabad Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.113 seconds)

Jul 16 2007 (HC)

Manju Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-16-2007

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3733

..... time, and may determine the places at which public service vehicles may stop for a longer time than is necessary for the taking up and setting down of passengers.119. duty to obey traffic signs.--(1) every driver of a motor vehicle shall drive the vehicle in conformity with any indication given by mandatory traffic sign and ..... authorities to determine the places at which the public service vehicles may stop for a longer time than is necessary for the taking up and setting down of passengers.9. section 119 of the same act further provides that every driver of a motor vehicle shall drive the vehicle in conformity with any indication given by mandatory ..... is that the parking slots should be notified and on road-side, places should be earmarked where taxies, buses etc. may be stopped to facilitate the boarding of passengers. it has been submitted that at nowhere in the city of lucknow, notice boards have been installed earmarking the parking places for vehicles like tempo, taxies or bus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2007 (HC)

Sachidanand Rai Son of Arvind Rai and ors. Vs. Shambhu Singh Son of Ja ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-2007

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1087

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri Radhay Shyam, learned Counsel for appellants and Shri B.N. Asthana learned Counsel for respondents.2. The substitution application of appellant No. 2 is delayed by 46 days. The reasons given for explaining the delay are good and sufficient. The delay condonation application and substitution application are allowed. The office shall make a note of the order in the array of parties.3. The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution on 19.8.2006 An application for recalling the order was filed on 11.9.2006. The counsel could not appear as he is stated to be ill on that date. The cause shown is sufficient. The restoration application is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number and with the consent of parties it was heard.4 This defendant's second appeal arises out of OS No. 132 of 1963 for declaration that the land 'Ka, Ya, Ha', Na is the 'Sahan' (Courtyard) of the house of the plaintiff and defendants-second set. The plaintiffs also pra...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //