Court : Allahabad
Decided on : May-24-2001
Reported in : 2001(3)ARBLR410(All); 2001CriLJ274
..... been made. the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel, in our opinion, is wholly baseless as the answer to the question posed by him has been given in konkan railway corporation ltd. v. mehul construction company (supra) in paragraph 8 of the reports, which reads as under :'.....it is clarified thatthe learned chief justice not having ..... the approach of the chief justice while hearing a petition under section 11 of the act and whether he should entertain and decide every objection has been indicated in konkan railway corporation ltd. v. mehul construction co. (supra) at page 206. in the following words :'......when the matteris placed before the chief justice or his ..... of the order passed by the chief justice while making appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the act was referred for consideration to a larger bench in konkan rly. corporation ltd. and others v. mehul construction co., (2000) 7 scc 201. after a detailed consideration of the matter, it was observed as follows .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : May-24-2001
Reported in : 2001(3)ARBLR427(All); 2001CriLJ263
..... been made. the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel, in our opinion, is wholly baseless as the answer to the question posed by him has been given in konkan railway corporation ltd. v. mehul construction company (supra) in paragraph 8 of the reports, which reads as under :'...... it is clarified that thelearned chief justice not ..... the approach of the chief justice while hearing a petition under section 11 of the act and whether he should entertain and decide every objection has been indicated in konkan railway corporation ltd. v. mehul construction co. (supra) at page 206. in the following words :'......when the matter isplaced before the chief justice or his ..... of the order passed by the chief justice while making appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the act was referred for consideration to a larger bench in konkan rly. corporation ltd. and others v. mehul construction co., (2000) 7 scc 201. after a detailed consideration of the matter it was observed as follows .....
Tag this Judgment!