Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 preamble 1 konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 37 results (0.306 seconds)

State of Tamil Nadu and ors. Vs. L. Abu Kavur Bai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC326; 1983(2)SCALE541; (1984)1SCC515; [1984]1SCR725; 1984(16)LC1(SC)

..... thought of preventing misuse in the running of the vehicles by private operators and in order to provide better facilities to the transport passengers or to the general public, acquisition of vehicles or for that matter the rights and interests in the contract carriage operators alongwith their land, buildings, workshops, etc., would ..... from challenge. we have already adverted to this aspect of the matter heretofore.37. sub-section 2(a) of section 2 provides that the acquisition of the stage carriages shall commence with the districts wherein comparatively fewer number of stage carriages were operating. this provision appears to have been incorporated ..... the tamil nadu state following the karnataka pattern passed the impugned ordinance, which later took the shape of the tamil nadu stage carriages and contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') to nationalise the state transport industry by stages. the madras high court stayed the operation of .....

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Satya NaraIn Kapoor (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC167; JT2004(9)SC410; 2004(9)SCALE112; (2004)8SCC630; (2005)1UPLBEC384

R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 13096/1995.2. In one of the prime commercial areas of the city of Allahabad, known as Chowk Sabzi Mandi, there are situated two shops described as Nazul Shop Nos. 195 and 196 the area whereof is 63 sq. ft. each.3. We are not concerned with the earlier controversy relating to the allotment and several claimants to the shops. The fact remains that on 30.10.1991, the District Magistrate directed the Nagar Mahapalika to have the shops vacated so as to be available for fresh allotment through public auction inasmuch as the shops were continuing in illegal occupation -- shop No. 195 in the occupation of Mohammad Ali and shop No. 196 in the occupation of Anoop Kumar son of Satya Narain Kapoor.4. Three writ petitions came to be filed in the High Court of Allahabad. Writ Petition No. 32605 of 1991 was filed by Satya Narain Kapoor alleging that he was the one inducted into possession of shop No. 196 in the year 1973 by the allottee of the shop Lat...

Shin-etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. Vs. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3766; 2005(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2005(4)AWC3851(SC); [2005]127CompCas97(SC); 2005(4)CTC297; JT2005(7)SC426; (2005)4MLJ84(SC); (2005)7SCC234; 2005(2)LC1277(SC)

..... to refuse a reference to arbitration if it 'finds' that the arbitration agreement is 'null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed'.4. this court in konkan railways corporation ltd. and ors. v. mehul construction co. : air2000sc2821 pointed out that parliament had clearly indicated that the act had substantially adopted the model law ..... .'90. the court after examining the documents and taking into account the commercial reality of the situation came to the conclusion that the plaintiffs, i.e., shipping company has made out a 'strongly arguable case' in support of the existence of an arbitration agreement. the court further observed that 'obviously it has not ..... to examine in detail the documents since the parties failed to produce the document containing the authorization given to the broker to act on behalf of the shipping company. therefore, the court has referred to the commercial reality as well as the affidavits of the parties to arrive at the conclusion that there was .....

Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2254; 2008AIRSCW5964; 2008(4)LH(SC)2896

..... the argument advanced by mr. guglani is that the luggage which was being carried by the crew members, had no specific identification slips as in the case of an ordinary passenger travelling in an aircraft. so what was being carried in the carton was within the knowledge of the appellant alone and, therefore, the element of possession and control of ..... my presence. i had gone through the panchnama and then i signed the same. 143. he furthermore accepted:it is correct that many recoveries have been effected from the passengers arian afghan airlines earlier to this recovery and cases are pending before this court. 144. pw-1 stated that seal had been given to pw-4, rajesh sodhi, deputy ..... , kulwant singh and pw2, k.k. gupta, however, stated that the time of seizure was 8.30 pm. appellant's defence was that some carton left by some passenger was passed upon him being a crew member in this regard assumes importance (see jitendra (supra) para 6).148. panchnama was said to have been drawn at 10.00 pm .....

Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the appellant by issuing notification under section 4(1) of the 1894 act. the contents of that letter are reproduced below: the deputy commissioner, bangalore. sub: acquisition of land in vajarahalli and raghuvanahalli villages of uttarahalli hobli, bangalore south taluk in favour of the bangalore city co-operative, housing society ltd., bangalore. i am ..... previous promoters m/s. manasa enterprises (for procuring lands from the agriculturists). 6. whereas the second party has agreed to provide all the required services towards the acquisition of scheduled land for the first party, obtain all necessary approvals for forming the layout, roads, water lines, electric lines, drainage, sewerage connection, etc., and ..... 1991) 2 scc 408, m/s. jindal industries ltd. v. state of haryana 1991 supp (2) scc 587, d.s. parvathamma v. a. srinivasan (2003) 4 scc 705, shipping corpn. of india ltd. v. machado bros. (2004) 11 scc 168, j.p. srivastava & sons (p) ltd. v. gwalior sugar co. ltd., (2005) 1 scc 172 .....

international Tourist Corporation and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC774; (1981)2SCC318; [1981]2SCR364

..... to be noticed that entries 22, 23, 24, 25 and 29 specify railways, national highways, national waterways and maritime shipping, navigation and airways respectively, entry 30 which refers to carriage of passengers and goods specifies railways, sea, air and national waterways only but not national highways. again entry 89 which refers to ..... be the slightest doubt that the state of haryana incurs considerable expenditure for the maintenance of roads and providing facilities for the transport of goods and passengers within the state of haryana. the maintenance of highways other than the national highways is exclusively the responsibility of the state government, while the ..... subject to the provisions of list i and list iii with regard to such waterways; vehicles other than mechanically propelled vehicles.56. taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways.57. taxes on vehicles, whether mechanically propelled or not, suitable for use on roads, including tramcars subject to .....

S.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1

..... tea association v. ajit kumar barat, : (2000)illj809sc ]several similar actions having far reaching consequences have been held administrative, for instance, an order of acquisition or requisition of property; an order making an appointment to a civil post, an order granting sanction to prosecute a public servant; etc.it cannot be gainsaid ..... (2000)9scc406 ; ouseph mathai and ors. v. m. abdul khadir; : air2002sc110 ]in state of orissa and ors. v. gokulananda jena, : air2003sc4207, relying upon konkan railway corporation ltd. ii, the high court of orissa held that since the order passed by the chief justice was administrative, it was not amenable to writ jurisdiction under ..... before a two-judge bench, an order was passed directing the registry to place the papers before hon. the chief justice for passing appropriate orders. konkan railway corporation ltd. i was thus placed before a constitution bench of five judges. the constitution bench, : [2002]1scr728 considered the relevant provisions .....

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Calcutta Vs. Mrs. O.M.M. Kinnison (Dead), ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC2019; [1986]161ITR824(SC); 1986(2)SCALE355; (1986)4SCC297; [1986]3SCR674

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the assessee who has a life interest in the testamentary trust estate of late C.H. Kinnison comprising inter alia of the shares in an Indian company and commission from the managing agency of an Indian company can be said to have an interest in such shares and commission and that such interest is property located in India so as to be taxable under the Wealth-tax Act?2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the life interest of the assessee in the testamentary trust estate of late C.H. Kinnison is not an annuity which is exempt under Section 2(e)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act?2. Heilgers & Co. were managing agents of the Kinnison Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and the Naihati Jute Mills Co. Ltd., both Indian companies, for several years. Heilgers & Co. entered into a sub-partnership from time to time with James Alexander Kinnison under which the...

R.S. Nayak Vs. A.R. Antulay and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC2045; (1986)88BOMLR260; 1986CriLJ1922; 1986(1)SCALE745; (1986)2SCC716; [1986]2SCR621

..... serial no. name of the trust date of registration 1. indira gandhi pratibha pratishthan(igpp) 18.10.80 2. nirmal sethia pratishthan (nspp) 29.12.80 3. konkan unnati mitra mandal (kumm) 17.03.81 4. raigad zila pratishthan (rzp) 25.03.81 5. srivardhan matadhar sangh pratishthan (smsp) 25.03.81 6. mhasale ..... the rural areas of the konkan region. the managing director further reported that the trustees of the trusts were very eminent public personalities and the trusts had been issued certificate of exemption ..... board that over 600 employees working in grades i to v in the taj mahal and taj mahal intercontinental hotels, bombay, and who hail from the konkan region, had approached the managing director to contribute amounts to certain public charitable trusts recently established for the purpose of undertaking programmes of rural development in .....

Adarsh Travels Bus Service and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC319; 1985(2)SCALE880; (1985)4SCC557; [1985]Supp3SCR661; 1986(1)LC121(SC)

..... of the route meerut-bamanheri-deoband-gagalheri-saharanpur-ambala provided that they observe 'corridor restrictions', that is, provided they do not pick up or set down any passengers between meerut and bamanheri and between gagalheri. and saharanpur. in civil appeal nos. 1909 and 1910 of 1981, the appellants were applicants for the grant of ..... the scheme and by incorporating appropriate conditional clauses in the scheme to enable them to ply their vehicles over common sectors without picking up or setting down passengers on the common sectors. if such a course is not feasible the state legislature may intervene and provide some other alternative as was done by the ..... carriage on a portion of a notified route subject to terms and conditions including payment of license fee. there may be other methods of not inconveniencing through passengers but that is entirely a matter for the state legislature, the state government and the state transport undertaking. but we do wish to emphasise that good .....