Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: khadi and village industries commission act 1956 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 9 of about 441 results (0.155 seconds)

Reliance Industries Limited (a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2507

..... of ril, interalia, stating the following:board committee to consider reorganisation of reliance's businesses mumbai, 18th june 2005: the board of directors of reliance industries limited took note of the press statement issued by smt. kokilaben d. ambani, wife of the founder chairman shri dhirubhai h. ambani and expressed ..... of the amicable resolution as suggested were that shri anil d. ambani should be responsible for the energy, telecom and financial services businesses of reliance industries limited and its associate companies and the chairman should continue to remain incharge of other businesses including petrochemicals, oil and gas, refining and textiles. the ..... no. 71 of 2005 dated 24th october, 2005 which was filed to obtain sanction of the scheme of arrangement (the scheme) between ril i.e. reliance industries limited and four other companies viz., (i) reliance energy ventures limited, (ii) global fuel management services limited, (iii) reliance capital ventures limited and (iv .....

K.P. Singh Vs. the High Court of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... personal hearing to the petitioner at the stage of reply to charge-sheet and at the time of considering the representation of the petitioner after inquiry report. in madhya pradesh industries ltd. v. union of india and ors. : air 1966 sc 671 it has been held that opportunity need not necessarily by personal hearing. the petitioner had submitted reply annexure p ..... set right k.p. singh.53. dw 4 surinder kumar is a practicing advocate at ropar and has stated that on 15.12.2002 he had gone to miani (lakinder) village to inquire about k.p. singh as he came to know previous evening that k.p. singh was sick and he was at miani. he saw k.p. singh lying .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.1. Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 10 of 2006 and 6711 of 2007. 1. The legal questions in this batch of criminal appeals relate to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. This issue has received considerable attention since it involves tensions between the desirability of efficient investigation and the preservation of individual liberties. Ordinarily the judicial task is that of evaluating the rival contentions in order to arrive at a sound conclusion. However, the present case is not an ordinary dispute between private parties. It raises pertinent questions about the meaning and scope of fundamental rights which are available to all citizens. Therefore, we must examine the implications of permitting the use of the impugned techniques in a variety of settings.2. Objecti...

Narendra Road Lines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Up, and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... development act, 1976, and the regulations made thereunder in the year 1991, were not followed while notifying the areas for development by the 'yamuna expressway industrial development authority (in short, 'yeida'). he submits that the villages were not notified after following the procedure provided under the act. the objections were not invited and that notifications were discriminatory. he would submit that unless ..... development act, 1976. the name of the authority was changed by the notification dated 11.7.2008 into 'yamuna expressway industrial development authority' (in short 'yeida'). initially eight villages in district gautam budh nagar were notified under the authority. by subsequent notification more villages in five districts namely, gautam budh nagar, aligarh, agra, mathura and mahamaya nagar (hathras) were included. the authority under .....

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... the government. alternatively, it also opined that the administrative department may verify if acquisition of land can be made under section 15 of the orissa industrial infrastructural development 11 corporation act, 1980. after the aforesaid opinion was received, the administrative department was of the view that the second option to ..... department of higher education to the commissioner-cum secretary to government, revenue and disaster management, administrative approval was given for acquisition of lands in 22 villages mentioned therein for the proposed vedanta university by anil agarwal foundation. thereafter, the foundation deposited the establishment cost and the opinion of the law ..... beladala was included in the section 4(1) notification though initially ac. 1052.43 decimals of land were notified for acquisition in the said village, subsequently 226.52 acres were excluded as the above land had already been acquired previously for other purposes.11. counter affidavit has been filed .....

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... the government. alternatively, it also opined that the administrative department may verify if acquisition of land can be made under section 15 of the orissa industrial infrastructural development corporation act, 1980. after the aforesaid opinion was received, the administrative department was of the view that the second option to go ..... department of higher education to the commissioner-cum secretary to government, revenue and disaster management, administrative approval was given for acquisition of lands in 22 villages mentioned therein for the proposed vedanta university by anil agarwal foundation. thereafter, the foundation deposited the establishment cost and the opinion of the law ..... beladala was included in the section 4(1) notification though initially ac. 1052.43 decimals of land were notified for acquisition in the said village, subsequently 226.52 acres were excluded as the above land had already been acquired previously for other purposes. 11. counter affidavit has been filed .....

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the karnataka land revenue act. till today, no such permission is taken and no such order is produced before us. to start an industry in a village, permission of the village panchayat is required as per section 64 of the gram panchayat act. in order to obtain licence, they are expected to produce the plan of ..... act. the permission granted by the pollution control board ex-facie is illegal. it purports to give no objection for establishing of an industry in the survey numbers mentioned therein saundatti village. those survey numbers do not belong to shivashakti sugars. shivasakthi sugars have not acquired those lands and therefore, there is total non-application ..... dated 5.6.2006 certifying that shivasakthi sugars limited is a holder of loi for establishment of sugar factory proposed at saundati village, raibag taluk in belgaum district and there are no sugar industries existing within the radius of 15 kms of the proposed site as per the report cited at reference above. the reference .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... under section 4 read with section 17(1) and 17(4) of the land acquisition act, proposing to acquire 343.5881 hectare of land of village maicha for planned industrial development. declaration under section 6 was issued on 09.02.2007. petitioners case is that state government has not applied its mind while dispensing with the ..... others), the petitioners have challenged the notification dated 18th september, 2000 issued under section 4 of the act proposing to acquire 56.4984 acres land of village chhapraula for planned industrial development. the petitioners claim to be owner and in possession of the plots mentioned in paragraph 3 of the writ petition. it is pleaded that although ..... act read with sections 17 (1) and 17 (4) of the land acquisition act, proposing to acquire 58.893 hectares of land of the village in question for planned industrial development. notification under section 6 of the act was issued on 22.04.2000. petitioners claim to be in actual physical possession. petitioner's case .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and ors. (1986) suppl. scc 20 lays down that there is no inherent or implied limitation in bringing into force a delegated legislation; (xxi) m/s. atlas cycle industries ltd. and ors. v. state of haryana (1979) 2 scc 196, states that mere failure to lay the delegated legislation before the house of parliament does not affect ..... in 1981, was upheld relying upon harishankar bagla on the plea that parliament itself has authorized the central government vide section 48(2- c) to override the provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947. the decision in kishan prakash sharma and ors. v. union of india and ors. 2001(2) s.c.t 656 : (2001) 5 scc 212 ..... 3 scc 35 reiterates that "the subordinate legislation cannot override the principal legislative provisions."; f. sada shiv dada patil v. purushottam onkar patil, (2006) 11 scc 161; and jk industries ltd. and ors. v. chief inspector of factories and boilers and ors., (1996) 6 scc 665 hold that a section and the proviso thereto must be construed as a .....

Mr.M.Palanichamy. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... a case on jurisdiction.2. the brief facts, according to complaint, are that m/s. saraswati industrial syndicate is a company which has its registered office at yamuna nagar (haryana). the company has a steel mill situated at village nara in district muzaffar nagar (u.p.). the accused is also a private limited company known as ..... oil traders and another vs. south india viscose ltd., reported in 1999 company cases 798, the facts are as follows:-south india viscose ltd., presently known as siv industries limited (for short "the company") was a public company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its registered and corporate office at no. 1977-a, trichy road ..... forum at calcutta in the instant case. the contention with regard to point of jurisdiction 'raised on behalf of the petitioners accused, therefore must fail."29. in ruchi soya industries ltd., mumbai v. state of maharastra reported in 2010 (2) bankmann 228 (bom.) = 2010 (2) bom.cr (cri) 782, the writ petitioner therein was the .....