Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka value added tax amendment act 2009 Court: rajasthan Page 13 of about 123 results (0.143 seconds)

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Surendra Kumar Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2013 (HC)

C.i.T., Udaipur Vs. M/S Chittorgarh Kendriya Sah. Bank Ltd

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

ITA No.77/2013 1 D.B.INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77/2013 CIT, Udaipur versus M/s Chittorgarh Kendriya Sahakari Bank Limited DATE OF ORDER: 17th October 2013. HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.K.K.Bissa for the appellant BY THE COURT: Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the material placed on record, we are satisfied that no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act].against the order dated 17.12.2012 passed in ITA No.387/JU/2011 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur [the ITAT].for the assessment year 2007-08. The sum and substance of the matter could be noticed in the following: The assessee is a co-operative society, engaged in the business of banking and providing credit facilities to its members and public in general. The assessee had earlier been claiming, and was being allowed, deduction under Section 80P(2...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2012 (HC)

Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7770/2012 Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :15. h December, 2012 HON'BLE SHRI SANDEEP MEHTA, J.Mr. N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi,P.P. REPORTABLE Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya s/o Late Rameshchandra Goriya who has been arrested in C.R. No. 59/2012 registered at Police Station Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 274, 275, 276, 420, 120-B I.P.C. and 103, 104 Trade Mark Act and Section 17-B & 27 Drugs & Cosmetics Act. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the S.H.O. P.S. Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur as well as the Drug Control Officer, Jodhpur received a source information regarding the 2 transaction of spurious Mero-CD, Merosul(Meropenam) injections. T...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //