Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka urban water supply and drainage board act 1973 section 60 mode of recovery of dues Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 4 results (0.117 seconds)

May 08 2007 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Chairman Railway Board, Ministry of R ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3920; 2008(1)SLJ348(NULL)

..... , deprived, and similar categories of persons, who cannot approach the court. certain principles which have emerged in this respect from the apex court' judgment in : air2006sc3106 b. srinivasa reddy v. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees' association and ors. are as under:(a) that the members of the said association should have sufficient strength so as to come in the category of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2010 (HC)

Smt. Meena Devi Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... wrong when public office is involved and the incumbent who is holding the office, same is without any authority of law. 17. in the case of b. srinivasa reddy vs. karnataka urban. water supply & drainage board employees' association, 2006 (3) air kar r 497, the parameters of issuance of writ of quo-warranto along with the issue of locus has been dealt with extensively .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

Northern India Textile Research Association Vs. Presiding Officer and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2009)IIILLJ12All

..... includes such allowances including dearness allowance as the workman is for the time being entitled to.16. the supreme court, in bharat electronics ltd., bangalore v. industrial tribunal karnataka, bangalore and anr. (supra) has held that allowance which is not contingent on actual working is part of wages for the purposes of section 33(2)(b) ..... allowance) as the workman is for the time being entitled to;(ii) the value of any house accommodation, or of supply of light, water, medical attendance or other amenity or of any service or of any concessional supply of foodgrains or other articles;(iii) any travelling concession, but does not include:(a) any bonus;(b) any contribution paid ..... (supra), was not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case. the said judgment related to the provision of section 20(4) of the u.p. urban buildings (regulation of letting rent and eviction) act, 1972, which had no bearing with the provision of section 6-e(2)(b) of the u.p. industrial disputes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2006 (HC)

Bhadauria Gram Sewa Sansthan Vs. Asstt. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Allah ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006]148STC356(All)

..... uptc 510;(xi) jai sharma int udyog v. deputy collector (collection), sales tax (1999) 116 stc 357; and(xii) m/s mycon construction ltd. v. state of karnataka and anr. 2002 uptc 585 (sc).15. sri navin sinha, learned senior counsel, in reply, submitted that the agreement cannot go beyond the provisions of the act. according to ..... the word turnover has been defined in section 2(i) of the u.p. trade tax act as follows:-'turnover' means the aggregate amount for which goods are supplied or distributed by way of sale or are sold, by a dealer, either directly or through another, on his account or on account of others, whether for cash ..... him, there cannot be any estoppel against a statute. in support of his submission, he has relied upon the following decisions :-(i) ahmedabad urban development authority v. sharadkumar jayantikumar pasawalla and ors. : [1992]3scr328 ;(ii) bengal iron corporation and anr. v. commercial tax officer and ors. : 1993(66)elt13(sc) ;( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1996 (HC)

Natraj Chhabigrih, Sigra Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All375

..... affidavit filed for the union territory it was pleaded that the object of issuing the notification was to increase construction of new buildings in the urban areas of chandigarh so that as the supply of housing accommodation increase, the pressure on the tenant as class may decrease.the supreme court on these submissions held (para 12) :' ..... more heavily on some in the same category, is not by itself a ground to render the law invalid.106. in p. m. ashwathanarayana sctty v. state of karnataka : air1989sc100 . following observations were made: (at p. 119 of air) :--'the lack of perfection in a legislative measure docs not necessarily imply its unconstitutionality. it is ..... object and policy but its object and policy need not always be strictly confined to its preamble and the provisions contained therein.180. in m/s. punjab tin supply co., chandigarh v. central government : [1984]1scr428 , the question came up for consideration as to what are the relevant factors to determine the object of an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2011 (HC)

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... into three broad categories: (i) acquisitions for the benefit of the general public or in national interest. this will include acquisitions for roads, bridges, water supply 123 projects, power projects, defence establishments, residential colonies for rehabilitation of victims of natural calamities. (ii) acquisitions for economic development and industrial growth. ..... against the division bench judgment, the society filed civil appeals challenging the division bench judgment. the apex court upheld the judgment of the karnataka high court and dismissed the appeal. the apex court laid down that when the acquisition was totally malafide and not for bonafide purpose, the ..... and major activities/uses permitted in these zones are given below: 17.5.1 controlled/development/regulated zone (a) urbanisable areas (including existing builtup/urban areas) within the urbanisable area proposed in the master/development plan of the respective town, the functions and uses designated as under be continued: .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2006 (HC)

Raghuraj Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Ta ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(All)153; [2009]179TAXMAN73(All)

..... v. anjum m. h. ghaswala and ors. : [2001]252itr1(sc) (constitution bench), mehsana district central co-operative bank v. state of gujarat : air2004sc1576 , dhananjaya reddy v. state of karnataka (2001) 4 scc 9 and indian banks' association and ors. v. devkala consultancy service and ors. : [2004]267itr179(sc) .14. in view of the aforesaid settled legal proposition, the ..... that is constituted between the banker and the customer is one of the debtor and creditor and not of trustee and beneficiary. applying this principle, the pass book supplied by the bank to its constituent is only a copy of the constituent's account in the books maintained by the bank. it is not as if the ..... the record and we find that the information received by the director of it (inv.) and the material available including the fax message sent by the secretary, national urban co-operative bank ltd., pratapgarh, showing a huge amount of money in the account of udai pratap singh, amounting to rs. 3 crores or so, who never .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2004 (HC)

Suresh Chandra Vs. Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2470

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Sharma, learneed Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.R. Mishra, learneed Counsel for the respondent, Ghaziabad Development Authority. 2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the order dated 4.1.99 passed by respondent/Ghaziabad Development Authority and for writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority to regularise service of the petitioner from 1.1.88 to the class IV category i.e., to the post of peon or Security Guard and for payment of arrears of salary in the regular pay scale like other employees since the month of March, 1994.3. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are that the petitioner was deployed as a daily wager peon since 1.1.88 and had continued to work in the said capacity from time to time with break. He filed Writ Petition No. 34733 of 1992 claiming relief of reguiarisation and for granting the regular pay scale in view of the Government Order dated 21.10.1989 claiming that some juniors to ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //