Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka universities of agricultural sciences act 1963 chapter 1 preliminary Page 2 of about 664 results (0.606 seconds)

Nov 25 2005 (HC)

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1

..... -2001 in w.p. nos. 20875 to 20938 of 2001 (anjanapura scheme).104. in w.p. nos. 1353 and 1354 of 2005, the university of agricultural science employees house building co-operative society has challenged the acquisition of land bearing sy. no. 9/1 measuring 0.27, 10/2 measuring 1. ..... incentives, concessions and infrastructural facilities the government agreed to extend to the first petitioner. in pursuance of the said government order, the 6th respondent-karnataka industrial area development board was instructed to acquire the aforesaid land for the benefit of the petitioners. in the meanwhile to expedite the project the ..... amendments to the constitution, incorporating parts ix and lx.-a and the consequential amendments carried out by the state legislature in the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976, karnataka municipalities act, 1964, karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993, the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, in particular section 2(c) defining bangalore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2001 (HC)

Prashanth E.L. Vs. Kuvempu University, Shimoga and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant448; ILR2002KAR684; 2002(3)KarLJ364

..... chandrashekar relying upon the decision of this court in the case of shamarao jahagirdar and others v university of agricultural sciences, hebbal, bangalore, 1996 (2) kar. lj. 266 submitted that since the authorities of the university, who have framed regulation 6 of the regulations, having considered the case of the petitioner, taken ..... examination and another., : air1985delhi142 4. however, sri devadas, learned counsel appearing for the university, and sri chandrashekar, learned counsel appearing for respondents3 and 4, strongly countering the submissions of sri krishnamurthy, submitted that since it is not in ..... case of abhijit v dean, government medical college, aurangabadand another , : air1987sc1362 and that of this court in the case of sandeep shenai v mangalore university, mangalore and anr., : air1992kant202 and also that of the delhi high court in the case of master vibhu kapoor v council of indian school certificate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2006 (HC)

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industrial Area Develo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2848; 2008(1)KarLJ164; 2007(4)KCCRSN258; 2007(4)AIRKarR395(DB).

..... established before the reference court and those lands are comparable lands to the land involved in this case and therefore the same has acquired non-agricultural potentiality which is the relevant consideration for the reference court to determine the correct market value of the same. further having regard to the undisputed ..... are not is dispute. the case of the respondent-owner is that the acquired land, along with the other acquired lands has already acquired non-agricultural potentiality on account of the industrial buildings were already constructed in and around the acquired land and industries have been functioning in the jigani industrial estate ..... was acquired by the state government in favour of kiadb which had acquired non agricultural potentiality, particularly having regard to the fact that the land was earmarked in the comprehensive development plan approved by the state government under the provisions of karnataka town (country & planning) act & in short called as kt & cp act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2006 (HC)

B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of law. the learned counsel further elaborating his submission, has placed reliance upon the decision of this court in d. rudraiah and anr. v. chancellor, university of agricultural sciences and ors. : air1971kant84 , wherein it is held that in quo warranto, the relator can only ask the court to examine whether the statutory ..... most ideal for the post of managing director, kuwsdb.note of political executive, the minister of urban development department6. this is a critical juncture for karnataka urban water supply and sewerage board. considering the projects on hand and the need to complete them within a definite time frame, there should be ..... contentions.2. necessary brief facts are stated in this common judgment to appreciate the rival legal contentions urged by the learned counsel for the parties : (a) karnataka urban water supply and drainage board employees' association represented by its president (hereinafter called as the 'association') and one mr. v.n. halakatte filed writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 1987 (HC)

Bangalore Water Supply and Vs. Kantha Chandra

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1617

..... a different person who has obtained permission to convert agricultural lands for non-agricultural purposes viz., for construction of buildings. respondents 2 to 5 are common to all these petitions. they are : the special deputy commissioner, bangalore. the karnataka appellate tribunal, bangalore, (for short the 'tribunal') the state of karnataka and the d.l.f. universals ltd., new delhi.2. the petitioner has sought for ..... planning act, 1961 and also to comply with the requirements of other laws like the karnataka land revenue act and the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 etc. it has already been held that the grant of permission to convert vast extent of agricultural lauds on the banks of arkavathy river for the purpose of raising a big township adversely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 1987 (HC)

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Kantha Chandra and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant1

..... a different person who has obtained permission to convert agricultural lands for non-agricultural purposes viz., for construction of buildings. respondents 2 to 5 are common to all these petitions. they are: the special deputy commissioner bangalore. the karnataka appellate tribunal, bangalore, (for short the 'tribunal') the state of karnataka and he d.l.f. universals ltd., new delhi.2. the petitioner has sought for ..... planning act, 1961 and also to comply with the requirements of other laws like the karnataka land revenue act and the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 etc. it has already been held that the grant of permission to convert vast extent of agricultural lands on the banks of arkavathy river for the purpose of raising a big township adversely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1999 (HC)

Assam Leather Industry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... v. harbhajan singh dhillon : [1972]83itr582(sc) , wherein while examining the constitutional validity of the amended wealth-tax act which included the capital value of agricultural land for the purpose of computing net wealth, the controversy waswhether the impugned act was a law with respect to entry, including entry 49 in list ii or ..... constitution provides full legislative competence to parliament in relation to the central act inasmuch as it vests all residuary powers of legislation in parliament. 104. state of karnataka v. union of india : [1978]2scr1 : that was a casewhere the question which arose was whether the central government canissue a notification to constitute the ..... a number of cases (see municipal committee, malerkotla v. haji ismail ; purxotoma ramanata quenion v. union of india air 1970 goa 35 ; sujatha touring talkies v. state of karnataka air 1986 kar 21 ; city of toroute v. virgo [1896] a.c. 88 ; indu bhusan bose v. rama sundari debi : [1970]1scr443 ). the meaning is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1991 (HC)

T.K. Narayanaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2115; II(1991)DMC271; ILR1991KAR1839; 1991(1)KarLJ389

..... case is not forbidden by law. added to that, jamuna alleged the serious offences against the petitioner working as assistant professor of sericulture in the university of agricultural sciences. in view of the seriousness of the allegations made against the petitioner, the status and position held by him, if the director general of ..... case and take further action. it appears to me, having regard to the circumstances in which jamuna presented her petition to the director general of police in karnataka, bangalore, the action initiated on the petition by the director general of police, bangalore, the deputy inspector general of police, belgaum, and the superintendent of ..... respondent-state, submitted that the probe done by the deputy superintendent of police into the petition presented by jamuna to the director general of police in karnataka, bangalore, was not the investigation, but a preliminary enquiry to determine the truth or falsity of the allegations made in the petition; that the real .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2008 (SC)

Sooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402

..... acquisition in its affidavit has rightly stated that land-owners were not small farmers, small owners/marginal farmers but they have illegally converted agricultural land into non-agricultural land and have sold/ transferred/ allotted to builders/ developers/ real estate owners of properties. acquisition was for industrial policy of state ..... in the said affidavit, it was, inter alia, contended that appellants were not small land-holders or marginal farmers. most of them have converted agricultural lands unauthorizedly into housing plots and sold them to various builders/ developers/property dealers/estate agents and they were not cultivating the land. no doubt, ..... v. commissioner of commercial taxes, karnataka and ors. : air1988sc1487 , referring to american authorities, mukharji, j. (as his lordship then was) stated;it is trite knowledge that eminent domain is an essential attribute of sovereignty of every state and authorities are universal in support of the definition of eminent domain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2008 (HC)

A. Janardhan Shetty, S/O. Late Sankappa Shetty and ors. Rep. by Gpa Ho ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2159

..... is applicable to the fact situation.35. in the cdp the lands are designated for various purposes such as agricultural, residential, industrial and other purposes by the town planning authority under section 21 of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961, which reads thus:21. contents of the comprehensive development plan.-(1) the ..... street pattern, indicating major and minor roads, national and state high ways, and traffic circulation pattern, for meeting immediate and future requirements;(c) areas reserved for agriculture, parks, play-grounds and other recreational uses, public open spaces, public buildings and institutions and areas reserved for such other purposes as may be expedient for new ..... proceed with the acquisition of land of the land holders it must form an opinion that the lands which are going to be acquired are not good agricultural lands. the provision of section 28(2) of the kiad act has laid down the statutory duty and bound by the procedure prescribed in law. if .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //