Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 section 17 power to make rules for control of public vehicles Page 8 of about 555 results (0.173 seconds)

Mar 17 1995 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Nagappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR1361; 1995(2)KarLJ28

..... or any custom or usage or any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law.'30. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the act, the government of karnataka, with the concurrence of the hon'ble chief justice of this court, have specified the courts of session specified in column no. 2 of the table in ..... punishable under sections 312 and 376 of the indian penal code and that therefore, the charges framed for the said offences had to be deleted.8. the state of karnataka opposed the motion. the learned trial judge, after hearing both the sides, held that the charges framed against the accused for the offences punishable under sections 312 and 376 ..... combined, and for any offence constituted by any one, or more of such acts.(5) nothing contained in this section shall affect section 71 of the indian penal code (45 of 1860).' 65. the section is not controlled by the words 'not exceeding three' occurring in section 219. there is nothing in section 220 to warrant the rule that not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2021 (HC)

M/s Unidesign Builders And Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. National Commission ...

Court : Karnataka

..... hand, blame is sought to be placed against each other that the tahsildar was required to follow the process as contemplated under section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act, while it is contended by the tahsildar that he followed the instructions of the assistant commissioner.25. there can be no manner of doubt that ..... necessary for securing compliance with the order.20. it is clear from the documents available on record that the procedure prescribed under section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act, has not been followed before evicting the persons in possession of the commercial/residential buildings. therefore, there being violation of the principles of natural justice and ..... by now well settled that execution of a decree/order is not permissible until the expiry of the period of appeal. moreover, section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act prescribes the following mode for eviction: (i) by serving a notice on the person or persons in possession requiring them within such time as may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2021 (HC)

M/s Unidesign Builders Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... hand, blame is sought to be placed against each other that the tahsildar was required to follow the process as contemplated under section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act, while it is contended by the tahsildar that he followed the instructions of the assistant commissioner.25. there can be no manner of doubt that ..... necessary for securing compliance with the order.20. it is clear from the documents available on record that the procedure prescribed under section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act, has not been followed before evicting the persons in possession of the commercial/residential buildings. therefore, there being violation of the principles of natural justice and ..... by now well settled that execution of a decree/order is not permissible until the expiry of the period of appeal. moreover, section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act prescribes the following mode for eviction: (i) by serving a notice on the person or persons in possession requiring them within such time as may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2021 (HC)

Jayamma Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... hand, blame is sought to be placed against each other that the tahsildar was required to follow the process as contemplated under section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act, while it is contended by the tahsildar that he followed the instructions of the assistant commissioner.25. there can be no manner of doubt that ..... necessary for securing compliance with the order.20. it is clear from the documents available on record that the procedure prescribed under section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act, has not been followed before evicting the persons in possession of the commercial/residential buildings. therefore, there being violation of the principles of natural justice and ..... by now well settled that execution of a decree/order is not permissible until the expiry of the period of appeal. moreover, section 39 of the karnataka land revenue act prescribes the following mode for eviction: (i) by serving a notice on the person or persons in possession requiring them within such time as may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2021 (HC)

Sri Ravi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the principle of rotation for purpose of reservation of offices under this section shall commence from the first election to be held after the commencement of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993. it is in furtherance of the mandate of article 243k and the statute, the guidelines are formulated. the relevant clauses of guidelines which ..... b and for women. these guidelines were issued in exercise of power conferred on the commission under 8 section 44(2) of the karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act, 1993 ( the act for short).3. in furtherance of the order dated 01.01.2021 the commission issued a letter directing the deputy commissioner to use software ..... in exercise of its powers under article 243k of the constitution read with section 44(2) of the act. article 243k of the constitution reads as follows:- 243k. elections to the panchayats.- the superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, all elections to the panchayats shall be .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2024 (HC)

B Guruprasad Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... belongs to scheduled tribe at the time of filing nomination paper to reserved constituency. therefore such cases are not covered under this act. in fact the hon'ble high court of karnataka in the case of sri. chikkanna v/s. district social welfare officer and another in w.p. no.13173/2008 [gm ..... election. in the instant case the complaint filed by the complainant before this authority is under the karnataka scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward classes [reservation of appointment etc.,]. act, 1990. admittedly, the said act and rules are enacted for the purpose of issuing caste certificate or validity certificate only for appointment or ..... certificate was issued for election purpose which was not covered under the karnataka scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes (reservation of appointment etc.) act, 1990 and the rules framed thereunder in the year 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the act and the rules for short). the complaint thus comes to be dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2003 (HC)

Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation Vs. K.R. Mahalingaiah and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(3)KarLJ445; (2003)IILLJ766Kant

..... sister's marriage is contrary to the conduct of the conductor. if really, he carried rs. 300.00 nothing barred him to report the same to the traffic controller before starting of the bus, when he had reported that he had excess amount of rs. 25.00. this conduct of the conductor negates the plea ..... dismissing him from service on 13-8-1994. aggrieved by the said order the respondent filed an application under section 10(4-a) of the industrial disputes act (karnataka amendment) act, 1988 before the iii additional labour court, bangalore, contending that one passenger gave rs. 100 note and purchased ticket and while getting down from the ..... recorded by the enquiry officer and the order of dismissal passed by the disciplinary authority are illegal and contrary to the mandatory requirements of regulation 23 of the karnataka state road transport corporation servants (conduct and discipline) regulations, 1971 and therefore sought for setting aside the order of dismissal.3. the petitioner filed its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (TRI)

Gajendra Haldea S/O Late Shri Rao Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL203

..... scope of the two provisions is different. as already pointed out, under the original section 121 the chairperson had the jurisdiction of general superintendence and control over the appropriate commissions, while present section 121 of the act confers power on the appellate tribunal to issue, from time to time, such orders, instructions or directions as it deems fit, to the regulatory commissions ..... transfer schemes for the transfer of the assets and staff into successor companies. orissa, haryana, andhra pradesh, karnataka, rajasthan and uttar pradesh have passed their reform acts and unbundled their state electricity boards into separate companies. delhi and madhya pradesh have also enacted their reforms acts which, inter alia, envisage unbundling/ corporatisation of sebs. 3. with the policy of encouraging private sector participation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... the outskirts of bengaluru, etc may be the relevant factors. even the fact that the area of tumakuru falls in municipal corporation constituted under the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 is also one of the several - 344 - relevant considerations. in the case of chandra bhavan boarding, the apex court has considered a ..... products having its principal office at: survey no.42, m t sagar industrial estate gokul road hubballi - 580030 through its proprietor jagadish suri3 s l flow controls having its principal office at: manjunath nagar cross gokul road hubballi58003 through its proprietor veerendra koujalagi ... appellants (by shri b.c. prabhakar, advocate) - 49 ..... jp nagar, girinagar bengaluru-560085 represented by: managing director dr. b.k.vishanath bhat4 sri ram hospital no.10,7/2, nishvasaha centre opp. traffic police station old madras road, k.r.puram bengaluru56003 represented by partner dr.g.rajesham5 premier sanjeevini hospital nh-4, dasarahalli bengaluru 57 represented by: .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Pointec Pens And Energy Pvt Ltd Vs. The Secretary To Government,

Court : Karnataka

..... the outskirts of bengaluru, etc may be the relevant factors. even the fact that the area of tumakuru falls in municipal corporation constituted under the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 is also one of the several - 344 - relevant considerations. in the case of chandra bhavan boarding, the apex court has considered a ..... products having its principal office at: survey no.42, m t sagar industrial estate gokul road hubballi - 580030 through its proprietor jagadish suri3 s l flow controls having its principal office at: manjunath nagar cross gokul road hubballi58003 through its proprietor veerendra koujalagi ... appellants (by shri b.c. prabhakar, advocate) - 49 ..... jp nagar, girinagar bengaluru-560085 represented by: managing director dr. b.k.vishanath bhat4 sri ram hospital no.10,7/2, nishvasaha centre opp. traffic police station old madras road, k.r.puram bengaluru56003 represented by partner dr.g.rajesham5 premier sanjeevini hospital nh-4, dasarahalli bengaluru 57 represented by: .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //