Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka souharda sahakari act 1997 section 2 definitions Page 7 of about 9,221 results (0.181 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Vittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

N B Pooviah Vs. The State Of Karanataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Shadakshari Vs. The Assistante Executive Engineer

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Concorde Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri B S Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Santosh A Shetty Vs. The State Of Karantaka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri A Ramaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .46. it is also contended that there is no definition of the expression an arrear of land revenue recoverable under section 9(8) and thereby it implies that recourse has to be taken to the definition found under section 60(b) of the karnataka land revenue act and thereby it implies that the person becomes a legal owner of the land and thereby by creation of a statute, a person cannot be presumed to be the owner of land on the one hand for purposes of land revenue and as a criminal ..... petition is filed under articles226and227of constitution of india praying to declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, is unconstitutional and ultra-vires articles14 19, 21 and300 of the constitution of india (annexure-a); quash the criminal proceedings pending before the karanataka land grabbing prohibition special court, bengaluru in proceedings dated1611.1997 as against the petitioner for offence punishable under sections33and73karnataka forest act, 1963, rule25 42, 43 karnataka forest rules, 1969, column no.2 the forest conservation act1980and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //