Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka souharda sahakari act 1997 section 15 promotion of subsidiary organisations Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 32 results (0.224 seconds)

Amar Traders Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (intellige ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1998]111STC265(AP)

..... of consignment of 58 bags of sagar brand gutka.2. the facts in brief are :the petitioner is a registered dealer under the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 (for short, 'kst act') and under the central sales tax act, 1956. it is engaged in the business of gutka, pan masala, zarda, supari and cigarettes. for the purpose of its business, ..... goods from kanpur to bidar they were actually planning to sell the goods at hyderabad and therefore in exercise of the power conferred under section 29 of the act, the goods were detained and therefore the writ should be dismissed.6. before considering the arguments of both sides it is necessary to extract the detention order. ..... appears to have arrangement for transhipment. the consignment reached adilabad check-post on october 7, 1997. under section 29-b of the andhra pradesh general sales tax act, 1957 a transit pass is necessary whenever the goods are required to pass through andhra pradesh. it is issued at entry check-post and has to be surrendered .....

Pentakota Radhakrish Vs. C.i.T., Visakhapatn

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... .commissioner of welath tax versus smt. anjamli khan , that of the bombay high court in akber a. dehgamwalla versus commissioner of wealth tax and that of the karnataka high court in c.n.nagakumar versus commissioner of wealth tax learned standing counsel for the department on the other hand submits that it is only an amount, which ..... on the other hand. the movable property takes in its fold not only the tangible items but also the intangible ones. section 130 of the transfer of property act provides for transfer of actionable claims also. that expression is defined under section 3 of that enactment as under: actionable claim actionable claim means a claim to any ..... is not determined could not have been made at all. in this regard, focusing of attention to certain basic of law becomes necessary. the transfer of property act deals with the gifts pertaining not only to immovable properties but also movable properties. section 122 takes in its fold both the categories of properties and it reads .....

Chinta Obula Reddy Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C. Musheerabad, Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : II(1998)ACC117; 1998(2)ALD507; 1998(2)ALT268

..... ends of justice. for an eye injury, depending upon the nature and the extent of the disability, rs.10,000/- and more can be awarded. comparable cases in general manager, karnataka state road transport corporation, : air1979kant58 , madras motor case, 1975 acj 291, ahmedabadmunicipal corporation case, 1981 acj 53, balbir singh case, and nagappaiah case, support such a view. in this case ..... of 1987 dated 24-11-1989, is questioned by the appellant/claimant in this appeal. he had laid the claim under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (in short 'the act') to recover rs. 30,000/-. thetribunal awarded rs.6,00/-. it is an injury-claim case. aggrieved by that, the appeal is filed. the respondent is the owner .....

Patel Desai and Co. and Meera Industries Vs. Assistant Commissioner of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [2000]245ITR521(AP)

..... or 227. in coming to this conclusion, we are not without precedential support. 6. there is lucid exposition of law on this subject by a division bench of the karnataka high court consisting of rama jois and rajendra babu jj., in n. krishnan v. settlement commission 0065/1989 : [1989]180itr585(kar) . the learned judges after tracing ..... not a forum for challenging the legality of assessment order or orders passed in any other proceedings. this is not only evident from the provision of the act which prevents the application made from being withdrawn as also the provision which makes the decision of the settlement commission final and conclusive both on questions of ..... for some other assessment years also, the assessing officer did not allow the cost of construction as revenue expenditure under section 37 of the income-tax act (for short 'the act'). on appeal, the tribunal held in favour of the petitioners that it was a deductible expenditure. reference cases arising out of the said order of the .....

Patel Desai and Co., Secunderabad Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD274; (2000)165CTR(AP)655; [2000]243ITR689(AP)

..... 226 or 227. in coming to this conclusion, we are not without precedential support.6. there is lucid exposition of law on this subject by a division bench of karnataka high court consisting of rama jois and rajendra babu, jj., in n. krishnan v. settlement commission 0065/1989 : [1989]180itr585(kar) . the learned judges after tracing ..... not a forum for challenging the legality of assessment order or orders passed in any other proceedings. this is not only evident from the provision of the act which prevents the application matte from being withdrawn as also the provision which makes the decision of the settlement commission final and conclusive both on questions of ..... for some oilier assessment years also, the assessing officer did not allow the cost of construction as revenue expenditure under section 37 of the income tax act (for short 'the act'). on appeal, the tribunal held in favour of the petitioners that it was a deductible expenditure. reference cases arising out of the said order of .....

itc Limited, Secunderabad and Another Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD28; 1998(6)ALT318

..... of their contention, they relied on itc limited's case (supra). the facts in brief of the said case are as follows:state of kanmtaka enacted karnataka agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1966. under the act, maiket committees are directed in the state to levy and collect market fee from buyers in respect of specified agricultural produce at a rate which may not ..... and if it does so, that legislation would be ultra vires the powers of the state legislature.' 'this being the position, i, therefore, strike down that part of the karnataka act which takes in itself the power to levy market fee on tobacco or its products. even if the products may be sold in the markets in ..... the contrary is proved, be presumed to have been bought within such yard by the person in possession of such produce. pursuant to the said act, the market fee has been fixed by the state of karnataka at 30 paise per one hundred rupees of the price of such produce sold. 30 paise has been substituted by re.1/- by an .....

B. Archana Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364

..... commission, mandal commission, muralidhar rao commission, while passingly making a reference to kumara pillai commission (state of kerala) and nagan gowda committee (state of karnataka). the b.c. commission thereafter decided to adopt six-point criteria of determining the backwardness of any class of citizens. chapter ix contains recommendations wherein the ..... as an equalizing principle. this has been explained in a recent judgment of the supreme court of india in islamic academy of education v. state of karnataka : air2003sc3724 (for short, islamic academy), justice s.b. sinha in his separate judgment made the following observations, which are apposite in this prologue: ..... indra sawhney-i, the state of andhra pradesh enacted b.c. commission act. in accordance with section 3 thereof, the government of andhra pradesh constituted backward classes commission (hereinafter called b.c. commission) under the chairmanship of retired judge of karnataka high court, puttuswamy, j in g.o.ms. no. 9 dated .....

Sri Devi Hotels Private Limited and anr. Vs. the A.P. State Financial ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2007AP182; I(2008)BC309; [2007]138CompCas661(AP)

..... and which the preferred meaning of the provisions of section 29 of the act, will therefore have to be considered.32. in narasimhaiah (supra) a division bench of the karnataka high court disagreed with the interpretation placed on the provisions of section 29 of the act by the orissa, punjab & haryana and kerala high courts in sulochana ..... nair : air1992ori157 ; jasbir kaur and thresiamma (supra). several reasons were recorded by the karnataka division bench for the conclusion that section 29 does not enable a financial ..... court in n. narasimhaiah v. karnataka state financial corporation : air2004kant46 .22. it requires to be noticed that such a plea (as to the inapplicability of recovery process under section 29 of the act to third party collateral security offered) has not been raised in the writ petition. however, since this plea is a .....

Sri Devi Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director and anr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ALT446

..... is the preferred meaning of the provisions of section 29 of the act, will therefore have to be considered.32. in narasimhaiah (1 supra) a division bench of the karnataka high court disagreed with the interpretation placed on the provisions of section 29 of the act by the orissa, punjab and haryana and kerala high courts in sulochana ..... nair, jasbir kaur and thresiamma (4, 5 and 3 supra). several reasons were recorded by the karnataka division bench for the conclusion that section 29 does not enable a financial ..... court in n. narasimhaiah and etc. v. karnataka state financial corporation and ors. air 2004 karnataka 46 (d.b.).22. it requires to be noticed that such a plea (as to the inapplicability of recovery process under section 29 of the act to third party collateral security offered) has not been raised in the writ petition. however, .....

Lao-cum-revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division and ors. Vs. Mek ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP250; 2004(2)ALD451; 2004(2)ALT546

..... assigned land to the original assignee or to his legal heir provided that such restoration shall not be more than once.49. in manchegowda v. state of karnataka, : [1984]3scr502 , the supreme court observed that the legislature no doubt is perfectly competent to provide that such transactions will be null and void and ..... not excluded from the cognizance of the court, as under the irish constitution; they are merely made non-enforceable by a court of law..........'31. in state of karnataka v. ranganatha reddy, : [1978]1scr641 , krishna iyer, j., observed that each word used in article 39(b) and (c) of the constitution of ..... interest of the assignee in the assigned land.53. in r. chandevarappa v. state of karnataka, : (1995)6scc309 , the supreme court while considering the provisions of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes prohibition of transfer of certain lands act, 1978 observed:'the prohibition from alienation is to effectuate the constitutional policy of economic empowerment under .....