Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka souharda sahakari act 1997 section 15 promotion of subsidiary organisations Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 11 results (0.092 seconds)

Sep 21 2012 (HC)

Brij Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

..... .b.; air 1968 sc 870: ishwarlal girdharilal joshi. vs. state of gujarat:; air 1979 sc 1676: nagarjun b.n. vs. state of karnataka. 52. the section 11 of the u.p. land revenue act, confers power on the state government to take decision with regard to creation of district. accordingly, power conferred under section 11 of the u.p ..... mohan lal mehrotra and others; 1998 sc 431: naga people's movement of human rights. vs. union of india; air 1998 sc 2496: c. rangaswamaiah and others. vs. karnataka lokayukta and others. 48. the 1992 government order provides criteria with regard to grounds for creation of new districts which include the area, population, infrastructure, financial aspects etc. it ..... scc 28: m/s. ram chandra mawa lal and others. vs. state of u.p. and others; (1990) 2 scc 562: vijay kumar sharma and others. vs. state of karnataka and others; 1991 (supp) 1 scc 430: orissa cement ltd. vs. state of orissa and others; (2009) 5 scc 342: grand kakatiya sheraton hotel vs. sri nivas resorts ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2002 (HC)

Vajara Yojna Seed Farm and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ii ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)1UPLBEC496

..... the rules framed under section 8 of karnataka state civil services act, 1978 held that rules would have the force as state legislation have framed the rules. ..... judgment laid down as under:-'4...............................................................................the karnataka state civil services act is an act to regulate the recruitment and the conditions of service of persons appointed to civil services of the state of karnataka and posts in connection with the affairs of the state of karnataka. section 3 authorises the state government to ..... expressly conferred under section 9 of the u.p. intermediate education act and since the regulations have been framed under the act they have force of law and are legislative in character. apex court in 2001(1) scc 728, state of karnataka and anr. v. b. suvarana malini and anr., while considering .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2004 (HC)

Suresh Chandra Vs. Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2470

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Sharma, learneed Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.R. Mishra, learneed Counsel for the respondent, Ghaziabad Development Authority. 2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the order dated 4.1.99 passed by respondent/Ghaziabad Development Authority and for writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority to regularise service of the petitioner from 1.1.88 to the class IV category i.e., to the post of peon or Security Guard and for payment of arrears of salary in the regular pay scale like other employees since the month of March, 1994.3. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are that the petitioner was deployed as a daily wager peon since 1.1.88 and had continued to work in the said capacity from time to time with break. He filed Writ Petition No. 34733 of 1992 claiming relief of reguiarisation and for granting the regular pay scale in view of the Government Order dated 21.10.1989 claiming that some juniors to ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2004 (HC)

Cit Vs. Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2005]142TAXMAN362(All)

..... the constituent where the excess price was collected before or after the commencement of the act and, therefore, the assessee did not collect the excess sale price as part of its trading receipt.12. in the case of mysore sugar co. ltd. (supra), the karnataka high court has held that the assessee was permitted to collect the amount in question ..... price is finally fixed.13. in the case of seksaria biswan sugar factory (p) ltd. (supra), the bombay high court has agreed with the view taken by the karnataka high court in the aforementioned case.14. in the case of janta co-operative sugar mills ltd. (supra), the punjab and haryana high court has agreed with the aforementioned ..... account was maintained by the assessee.' (p. 426)16. the decisions of the andhra pradesh high court in the case of chodavaram co-operative sugars ltd. (supra), of the karnataka high court in the case of mysore sugar co. ltd. (supra) and of the bombay high court in the case of seksaria biswan sugar factory (p) ltd. (supra) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(All)170; [2005]274ITR340(All)

..... manner the separate account was maintained by the assessee.' 16. the decisions of the andhra pradesh high court in the case of chodavaram co-operative sugars ltd. (supra), of the karnataka high court in the case of mysore sugar co. ltd. (supra) and of the bombay high court in the case of seksaria biswan sugar factory (p) ltd. (supra ..... price is finally fixed.13. in the case of seksan'a biswan sugar factory (p) ltd. (supra), the bombay high court has agreed with the view taken by the karnataka high court in the aforementioned case.14. in the case of janta co-operative sugar mills ltd. (supra), the punjab & haryana high court has agreed with the aforementioned ..... the constituent where the excess price was collected before or after the commencement of the act and, therefore, the assessee did not collect the excess sale price as part of its trading receipt.12. in the case of mysore sugar co. ltd. (supra), the karnataka high court has held that the assessee was permitted to collect the amount in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2011 (HC)

Sudha Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Other

Court : Allahabad

..... decisions and accepts an organic development of the law besides providing assurance to the individual and certainty in the transactions vide m.a. murthy vs. state of karnataka 2003 (7) scc 517 and also state of punjab vs. devans modern brewans limited (2004) 11 scc 26. 34. when the court is divided, ..... and further, for the same reason, section 4 of the up admission to educational institutions (reservation for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes) act, 2006 (up act no. 23 of 2006) is also declared to be invalid and ultra vires, to the extent it relates to providing reservations, in admission of students to ..... or unaided private educational institutions, except minority educational institutions established under article 30 (1) of the constitution. 6. that the constitution (ninety-third amendment) act, 2005 is in consonance with the scheme and aims of the constitution. the aforesaid amendment neither abrogates fundamental rights of the people of india nor is contrary .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1996 (HC)

M/S. Tiveni Engineering Works Ltd. and Another Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All420

..... 81989-9034.252.01990-9131.654.61991-9236.749.528. a comparison to the corresponding figures for other states indicates that in andhra pradesh, haryana, karnataka and punjab the percentage of utilization of sugarcane for sugar industry was much more and punjab specially this percentage was a growing one from year to ..... the legislations controlling khandsari. legislations for sugar and sugarcanc are both central and state ones. the first one we may refer to is sugar cane act, 1934 (central act no. xv of 1934). it regulates the price of sugarcane intended for usein sugar factories. it empowers the state government to declare any area as ..... engineering works ltd., khatoli). the pressnote speaks of a decision on the part of the government to grant industrial licence under the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951, for the establishment of expansion of sugar factories in areas of assured sugurcane availability with potential for further development of sugarcane. it indicates that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1996 (HC)

The Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India and Others V ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1997All197; [1999]96CompCas527(All)

..... sale of the mortgaged properties by private treaty or by public auction. learned counsel has also placedreliance on the decision of the karnataka high court in the case of international coach builders limited (in liq.) v. karnataka slate financial corporation (1994) 81 com cas 49, wherein, it has been held that right of a secured creditor of ..... leathers limited and another. as the company had already come in liquidation by the time the suit was filed an application under $. 446 of the companies act, 1956 (act in short) was filed before this court- by order dt. 30-8-1995 this court granted leave to the applicants to continue the proceedingsof the said suit ..... the function of the liquidator and the receiver is more or less the same. the liquidator has however some additional responsibilities which have been provided in the act. consequently, preference should be given to me official liquidator to continue. he has referred to unreported decisions given by me in the matter of madan industries .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2005 (HC)

Smt. Santosh Mishra D/O Late Ram Sagar Pandey W/O Sri O.P. Mishra Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2597

..... filed for accepting the written statement. the learned counsel also submitted that proceeding for grant of probate or letter of administration being one under section 217 of the indian succession act, the code of civil procedure would be applicable on all fours. the learned counsel also referred to section 266, 268 and 295 and propounded that in case, the proceeding ..... in order to prop up his submission, the learned counsel placed credence on various decisions including mohandas dattaram prabhu and ors. v. u.f.m. mukund honnappa naik, air 2003 karnataka 428, nanda agarwal v. matri mandir varanasi and anr., 2004 (2) arc 598 and smt. savitha gupta v. smt. nagaratha and ors. air 2003 ..... karnataka 426. the learned counsel also placed reliance on smt. multivahuji v. smt. kalindivahuji and ors. air 1994 gujarat 42, bai sabu khima v. amardas balakdas air 1967 gujarat 214, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1949 (PC)

Rex Vs. Mohd. Etizad Rasul Khan

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1953All266

..... is a matter for the court to consider when exercising its discretion.'in the present case it appears to us that the grave consequences which must follow on the acts and conduct of the plaintiff in making the collections and publicising his title in negation of the title of the defendants amounts to a deliberate contempt and it should ..... the owner of the estate villages and in inculcating the belief that the defendant's possession was found to be without any right, and (3) that the aforesaid acts of kr. mohammad etizad rasul khan were calculated to create an atmosphere of prejudice against the defendants and to interfere with the course of justice and fair trial of ..... issued to kr. mohammad etizad rasul khan to show cause why action should not be taken against him for committing the offence of contempt of court for the various acts complained of, which were calculated to create an atmosphere of prejudice against the defendants such as to interfere with the course of fair trial and in any case .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //