Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka societies registration act 1960 section 24 inspection of documents Court: karnataka Page 84 of about 1,149 results (0.236 seconds)

Umesh Upadhya Vs. the Registrar of Co-operative Societies and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4811

..... collected share amount in all amounting to rs. 10,229/- from 50 members and submitted an application for registration of the society. but on 20.1.2003, the respondent no. 2 has rejected ..... totally outside the purview of the provisions of the act, particularly, sections 4 to 7 and other provisions of the act, but the respondent no. 2 informed the petitioner in respect of the guidelines (annexure 'c') issued by the respondent no. 1 regarding registration of any 'sahakari' under the karnataka souharda sahakari act, 1997 (in short 'the act').5. the petitioner has stated that he has .....

B.S. Yeddyurappa The State of Karnataka, by the Inspector of Police, B ...

Court : Karnataka

..... pursuant to which the lokayuktha police registered the above cases in respect of the offences under the prevention of corruption act, 1988 the karnataka land (registration on transfer) act, 1991 and indian penal code (for brevity 'the p.c. act, k.l.r.t. act and ipc respectively). jayakumar hiremath's signature is found on the fir also as the complainant. annexed to the ..... registered for the offence under sections 3, 4, 8 read with section 9 of the k.l.r.t. act, 1991. the registration of the case is in violation of sections 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the karnataka lokayuktha act. on the very same allegation, a complaint registered having been dismissed by the competent court, the respondent could not ..... bribe, no offence was held to be made out under section 5(1)(d) of the old p.c.act'. (2) (2010) 4 scc 450 (banarsi dass -vs- state of haryana); (3) 1999(6) scc 667 (common cause, a registered society -vs- union of india and others) in respect of the issuance of summons against the minister, whereby it .....

Rachana Gopinath and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in the absence of such satisfaction, respondent insisting for compliance of the procedures prescribed under the act is wholly unsustainable. 12. the registration obtained by the petitioners on a wrong conception under the karnataka shops and commercial establishments act, 1961 and further not renewed would not entitle the respondent to harass the petitioners association by ..... they carry on work in respect of one or many masters is negated by the apex court in management of som vihar apartment owners housing maintenance society ltd., case. this judgment is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. the apartment owners association is an association created for the benefit ..... employees, its activity should not be treated as an industry nor are they workmen. in that context, it is held that the apartment owners housing maintenance society is not an industry. the constitution bench judgment of the apex court in the case of bangalore water supply and sewerage board vs. r.rajappa and .....

Kodanda Touring Talkies Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR1

..... duration of a licence of a touring cinema in respect of a place, has, therefore, clearly rational relation to the said purpose of the act, namely, the localities in the state of karnataka to be benefited by touring cinemas. from this, it follows that sub-rule (2) cannot be regarded as one which violates article 14 ..... : sections 6(d) and 12) and; (b) the regulation of exhibitions in the state of karnataka ensuring the safety, convenience and comfort of public who may attend those exhibitions.8. keeping in view the above purposes of the act, we shall now deal with the sustainability or otherwise of the formulations in paragraph-4 (supra).formulation ..... determination in the present writ petitions and writ appeals.2. the karnataka cinemas (regulation) act, 1964, came into force in the state of karnataka, on the 15th of march 1971. section 19 of that act empowered the stategovernment to make rules for carrying out the purposes of the act. in exercise of such rule making power, the state government .....

Shivasharanappa Veerabhadrappa Kolar and ors. Vs. Assistant Commission ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1978Kant37; 1978(2)KarLJ136

..... learned brother malirnath, j.10. the petitioners have questioned the constitutional validity of the notification dated 20th september, 1977, issued by the state government under section 121 of the karnataka co.-operative societies act, 1959. the notification reads:'rural development and cooperation secretariat. notification no. rdc 232 cof 77 bangalore, dated 20th september, 1977. s. o. 2428.- in exercise of the powers conferred ..... 20-9-1977 the state government issued a notification no. rdc 232 cof 77, exhibit 'd' under section 121 of the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the act), applying the provisions of section 27(1) of the act with certain modifications in relation to annual general meeting of a co-operative sugar factory of which a co-operative agricultural credit .....

Sanna Hutchamma Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1987Kant98; ILR1986KAR2749; 1986(2)KarLJ155

..... dismissing her writ petition in which she had challenged the order of the state government confirming the order of the deputy commissioner made under s. 306 of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964 (the act for short) suspending the resolution of the town municipal council, turuvekere, dated 30-4-1957 by which a site was granted in favor of one t.k ..... in favor of t. k. didapper was less than rest. 2000/- no sanction of the government was necessary as provided under s. 38(2) of the act of 19.51 and no registration was also necessary for the reason that the value of the site was less than rest. 100/-.in any event, the power conferred either under s. 199 ..... municipal council considered that it was not necessary to secure the approval to the government before granting, it and further as the value was less than rs.100/- registration was not com-pulsar. however ,it is unnecessary to express any definite opinion about these questions for the reason that the power of suspension under s. 306 of the .....

S. Narayana Bhatta Vs. the Asst. Regional Transport Officer, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1981KAR195; 1981(1)KarLJ211

..... a public service vehicle is absolutely unnecessary. 6. the respondent in his statement of objections has amplified the reasons for denying the registration. first, he has stated that there is a clear prohibition under the karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 for registering a tourist vehicle. he has next contended that a transport vehicle not covered by permit would be liable to tax ..... registered only as an omnibus. nor there is any prohibition under the karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 for registering a tourist vehicle. that act was intended to acquire the then existing contract carriages and has nothing to do with the registration of contract carriages or tourist vehicles under the motor vehicles act. 13. the next contention urged for the respondent in support of the .....

The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1966Kant237; AIR1966Mys237; (1966)1MysLJ598

..... in support of his prayer for a certificate under article 133(1)(c). his main contention was that in view of the provisions contained in the press and registration of books act, it has to be held that the newspapers in question are new newspapers. this contention, we had closely examined in the writ petition and found to be ..... new newspaper. this court found no support for that contention from the provisions of the press and registration books act. it opined that the right to publish a newspaper under a particular name is property just as any other property and that right is subject to the ordinary ..... were being in chittoor but they are now published from bangalore. in the writ petition it was contended that in view of the provisions of the press and registration of books act, the place of publication of a newspaper cannot be changes and if so changed the newspaper published from the new centre would have to be considered as a .....

Abdul Basheer Sab Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1975Kant186; ILR1974KAR1313; 1974(2)KarLJ371

..... contention that the deputy commissioner has no jurisdiction to resume the land. the relevant provisions which have material bearing on the question are sections 3 and 8 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, and rule 43-g (7) of the rules. section 3 provides:'chief controlling authority in revenue matters:-- the state government shall be the chief controlling ..... the grant and resume the land to government is the only question for decision.the power of the deputy commissioner is located under section 8 of the karnataka land revenue act. he could in his district exercise all the powers and discharge all the duties conferred and imposed on him under the land revenue ..... with statutory rights end obligations.'with respect, i entirely agree with the above observation.9. in this context, it may not be out of place to refer to karnataka land grant rules, 1969, in which there is a special provision conferring power to resume land on an authority which granted the land in all matters where the grant .....

T.M. Channabasamma and ors. Vs. T.M. Rudriak and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1982Kant198; ILR1982KAR98

..... that that repeal was a necessary consequence of the extension of the hindu gains of learning act, 1930 to the state of karnataka as well. the miscellaneous personal laws (extension) act, 1959 amended s. 2 of the hindu gains of learning act, 1930 by extending the act with effect from february 1, 1960 throughout the territory of india except jammu and kashmir ..... not even referred to in ext. p-30.30. we now turn to the third circumstance relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants. that pertains to the registration of the will of halaswami. channabasamma presented that will, for reg:istration on feb. 5, 1960 and it was registered on mar. 11, 1960. these are undisputed facts ..... will can be registereal after consulting a vakil.'it is clear from this part of her evidence that she did not take the will ext. d-11 for registration on the ground that channabasaviah did not tell her that it could be registered and she also thought that she could take that step after consulting her lawyer. .....