Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka service examinations act 1976 Page 9 of about 48,516 results (0.193 seconds)

Miss Chandra R Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... she submits that the land was granted to late rajarathnam in the year 1946 considering his service in the military, and therefore, unless a notification is issued under section 15(6) of the act vesting the land with the state, the claim made for grant of occupancy rights in respect of the land in dispute cannot be considered by the land tribunal. ..... (i): it is the specific case of the appellants that the land in dispute was granted to late rajarathnam in the year 1946, who was in military service and the said land was cultivated by rajarathnam personally during his life time and thereafter by his legal heirs and at no point of time the land in dispute was leased to the claimant chandrappa. ..... in the case of srikante gowda vs land tribunal - 1977(2) klj126 it has been held by this court that the statutory presumption as to the record of rights under section 133 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, cannot be ignored unless such presumption is rebutted in accordance with law. ..... , for r-2 (a-e); r-3, r-4, r-5, r-6 & r-8 are served; v/o dated2503.2015 notice to r-7 is dispensed with) this writ appeal is filed under section4of the karnataka high court act, praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.48674/11 dated1502/2013. ..... even the other witnesses examined on behalf of chandrappa have corroborated his evidence. .....

M/s Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust Vs. Sri Parameshwara

Court : Karnataka

..... first plaintiff and the trust initially entered into an agreement to sell dated 20.03.1982, whereunder first plaintiff had agreed to obtain the permission under karnataka land reforms act, 1961 and the urban land ceiling and regulation act, 1976. ..... jamnalal bajaj seva trust has realised the complications imposed by the law regarding the sale of lands belonging to the trust in karnataka, the trust has agreed to take all necessary steps to solve and settle all the complecations by its own efforts and withdraw all the terms and conditions imposed on the second party in this regard. ..... the trust has not performed its part of contract and failed to obtain the necessary r.f.a no.656/2013 14 permissions which are set out in paras 2 to 6 of ex.p2; d.w.1 did not appear for cross-examination and d.w.2 did not appear for full cross-examination; and there is no rebuttal evidence on behalf of the trust; invoking the provisions of bombay trust act, 1950 is not permissible because the said act is not applicable to the lands situated in bangalore.12. ..... holder of the trust; that he was not in service with effect from 05.07.1982, therefore, defendant no.3 could not have been authorized to execute any agreement. ..... the trust has taken a definite stand that birdhichand was not in service on the date of the agreement i.e. ..... he has also denied a suggestion that birdhichand was in service holding gpa as on 25.07.1982. .....

M.R. Nagaraju Vs. Bangalore University

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1930

..... section 50 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 deals with the appointment of non-teaching and ministerial staff. ..... (6) notwithstanding anything in the preceding subsections, appointments to posts in the university equivalent to group 'c' and 'd' posts in the state civil services shall be made by the vice chancellor in accordance with the statutes to be framed for this purpose, and in accordance with the order issued by the state government from time to time for reservation of posts for scheduled ..... this being the legal position, let me examine the validity of the order passed in this case which reads thus :'bangalore universitysub : action on the report of the sub-committee of the syndicate on the affairs of the examination branch-suspension of concerned officers & officials.ref : 1. ..... petitioners 1 and 2 are working as senior assistants in bangalore university and petitioner-3 is the superintendent in the examination branch of the bangalore university. ..... the expression 'appointing authority' is defined in part i of chapter xx viii :'(a) 'appointing authority' in relation to the service of the university employees means :(i) the authority empowered to make appointments to the respective classes of services ;(ii) the authority which appointed the university employees to such services, grades or posts, as the case may be, i.e. .....

Hanumanth Ballappa Ilager Vs. the Karnataka University, by Its Registr ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR946

..... vide annexure-e from the 1st respondent stating that the mal-practice committed by the petitioner during the i year examination is proved and university has taken a decision that to the effect that: 'the performance of the candidate at b. ..... directed to consider the matter in accordance with relevant provisions of the karnataka state universities act and its existing regulations and decide the same after affording an opportunity to the petitioner, as expeditiously as ..... the i year b.com in the academic year 200-01 for which examination was held in the month of april 2001; his registration number was 4839; when he was writing the examination for the 1 year b.com, squad of the 1st respondent- ..... 77(2) not withstanding anything contained in sub-section 1 - (a) the punishment of debarring a student from examinations shall on the report of vice chancellor be considered and imposed by the syndicate'.but in the instant ..... mandatory provisions of the act, the order passed ..... when on a charge of malpractice at the examination, a show cause notice was issued to ..... act, the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent vide annexure-e is liable to be set aside.4. ..... karnataka state universities act ..... act and as such, no error has been committed by the 1st respondent - university. ..... karnataka state universities act ..... examination, petitioner took admission to the ii year b.com in the same college and he has appeared for the ii year examination ..... act ..... act ..... examination ..... karnataka state universities act ..... provisions of the universities act. .....

Gandhi Chailshtori Mohmood Vs. Vice Chancellor Karnataka University

Court : Karnataka

..... were iranian citizens who could not stay indefinitely in india with uncertain future and if they returned to iran, under the law said to be existing there, they were likely to be absorbed into compulsory military services jeopardising their educational career and therefore the court should strike down the order as admittedly the vice-chancellor did not have jurisdiction under the karnataka state universities act, 1976, (hereinafter referred to as the act) to impose that punishment.3. ..... the petitioners arc also unable to stay in india till october, 1987 and thereafter to appear in the examination ''therefore, he gave an interim direction to place the representations of the petitioner if made before the commencement of the meeting of the syndicate of the university, and if so placed, the syndicate shall consider the said representations on merits pursuant to ..... they have invigilation squads with special powers to inspect the examination halls, supervise the work of the examination hall and other invigilators and wherever found catch the students who indulge in that practice and subject them to enquiry, thereafter for punishment wherever the students deserve it. ..... assuming that he had the power and acted as such in an emergency, the question of ratification in regard to cancellation of performance 01 debarment from taking future examinations does not arise as that action can be taken only by the authority which is invested with that power, it is the syndicate. .....

Dr. M.C. Radhakrishna Vs. Bangalore University and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... , the bangalore university has issued a notification dated 25th february 1994, by which the statues called statutes (merit promotion scheme) were framed in exercise of powers conferred under section 36 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976. ..... learned counsel appearing on behalf of the bangalore university by contending that the aforecited judgments of the supreme court are not applicable to the facts of this case, inasmuch as, the karnataka universities act, 2000, provides specifically for appointment to the post of professors by promotion. ..... promotion under the time-bound promotion scheme cannot be treated on par with the promotion from a lower post to higher post where not only seniority, but even merit has to be examined by a duly constituted committee or commission. ..... was given to a teacher on the basis of the continuous service rendered in the department for a certain period. ..... to be fixed on the basis of continuous length of service in the pose held in the cadre. 7. ..... the seniority inter se of the teachers in any cadre shall be on basis of continuous length of service in the pose of that cadre. ..... court to clause 22.2(a) of bangalore university statutes contends that the teachers appointed substantively to permanent posts in clear vacancies shall be seniors to the persons appointed to temporary posts in the same cadre of services or class of post. ..... personal promotion to the post of reader as well as to the post of professors on completion of certain years of satisfactory service. .....

indus Towers Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... to discuss here the provisions of the service tax act in the context of the reliance placed by the assessee on the decision of hon ble karnataka high court that standard services have been rendered by the assessee to the ..... for the purposes of this section, (i) specified person shall mean, (a) the central government or any state government; or (b) any local authority; or (c) any corporation established by or under a central, state or provincial act; or (d) any company; or (e) any co-operative society; or (f) any authority, constituted in india by or under any law, engaged either for the purpose of dealing with and satisfying the need for housing accommodation ..... available to the sharing telecom operators to the passive infrastructure and with severe penalties prescribed for failure on the part of the indus to ensure uninterrupted and high quality service provided by the passive infrastructure, it is difficult to imagine how indus could have intended to part with the possession of part of the infrastructure. ..... of the hon ble delhi high court shows that the question of law for examination was whether the receipts were subject to levy of service tax by union of india or levy of value added tax by the delhi ..... no intention to rent or lease the premises or facilities or equipment and what is contemplated by the parties is a service; the revenue contends that the use of the premises, and the right to access it, amounts to renting the premises ..... 194c or 194-1,was not examined by the courts. 5.4.2. .....

T N Raviprakash Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... for preliminary hearing, this day, the acting chief justice made the following: ag.cj (oral): order1 the question that requires to be examined in this case is, whether sub-section (1) of section 8 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 ( the act for short) applies to any complaint involving an allegation as defined in section 2(2) of the act?. ..... a formal and public inquiry has been ordered with the prior concurrence lokayukta upa-lokayukta, as the case may be; the or of an (b) any action in respect of a matter which has been the commission of inquiry act, 1952 with the prior concurrence lokayukta upa-lokayukta, as the case may be; inquiry, under referred the for of or an (c) any complaint involving a grievance made after the expiry of a period of six months from ..... by the petitioner before the tribunal challenging the order dated 16.09.2017 (annexure-a4) passed by the government in exercise of the power under rule 14-a(2)(a) of the karnataka civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1957 entrusting holding of disciplinary inquiry against the petitioner to upa-lokayukta in respect of a certain misconduct alleged against him ..... procedure at the instance of one udaya shanker and chikka revanna in order to help them and thereby, you dgo has failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty, the act of which is unbecoming of a government servant and you dgo has committed misconduct as enumerated under rule 3(1) of karnataka civil services (conduct) rules, 1966. 5. .....

Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company and Ors Vs. Sanjeev Kumar S/O Nara ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... engaged on contract basis and after the expiry of the term of contract, the relationship came to an end and therefore, the question of claiming continuity of service as a regular workmen was without any basis and that the provision of 9 retrenchment under the id act, 1947 was clear in regard to contract labour, and therefore, the learned single judge was misdirected in arriving at the opinion formed in the impugned order.9 ..... 2015 in civil appeal no.3727 of 2015, wherein the supreme court has revisited the decisions 14 laying down the principle that temporary and casual labourers could not be reinstated into service with backwages, and it is demonstrated how those decisions could be distinguished on the facts and circumstances of each case and the workmen concerned in the above case had been directed ..... called for the record from the labour court and on examination of the same and on the basis of the rival contentions, has found that the respondents herein had rendered service from the year 1998 until they were terminated on 31st ..... advocate for r1 to r7) respondents these writ appeals are filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act praying to calling for records in writ petition set aside order of the learned single judge dated ..... the persons employed on daily wages having sought regularisation of service was the controversy and the supreme court following the case of secretary, state of karnataka and others v. ..... in the high court of karnataka kalaburagi bench r dated this the13h .....

The Management, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (icar) Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(3)KarLJ134

..... taken either before the conciliation proceedings or before the labour court; such a contention is taken for the first time before this court; that the petitioners' establishment is a society registered under the provisions of karnataka societies registration act, 1960; looking to the nature of work entwisted to the petitioners' institution, it is clear that the petitioner is an industry; that by the activities of the petitioners' institution, the farming community in the ..... finally, he contended that since the higher officer in library section or the officer who supervises the day-to-day work of the respondent is not examined before the tribunal on behalf of the 'management', the tribunal has rightly held that the petitioner has failed to establish that the order of ..... order of termination dated 29-6-1996 produced at annexure-c is silent and does not disclose the reasons as to why the respondent-workman was terminated from her service, but the same is sought to be explained by the petitioner before the 'tribunal' that the overall performance of the respondent-workman during her probation period ..... of probationer to the 'tribunal' by the appropriate government, the onus is on the authority who has passed such order of termination to prove to the satisfaction of the 'tribunal' that the action of the management in terminating the services of the workman is legal, justified and not tainted with mala fides, particularly in the light of the serious allegations made by the workman. .....