Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 31 right to recover immediate possession of premises to accrue to a widow Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 14 results (0.126 seconds)

Kapoor Devierwala Hotels Vs. Surat Textile Market Co-op Shops and Ware ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)3GLR2565

..... court has decided the question whether revision under section 115 lies to the high court from a revisional order made by the district court under the provisions of the karnataka rent control act, 1961. in paragraph 11 of the said judgement, the supreme court has observed as under :'11. on the analysis presented above, the two cases upon which ..... at that stage, to emphasise that what was granted was a licence and not a lease. that was obviously to circumvent the provisions of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947. it was apparently thought that the sophisticated description of the transaction as a 'licence ' instead of a lease would take it out of ..... the clutches of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act. it was precisely the type of agreement that forced the hand of the legislature to intervene and amend the act by introducing s. 15 ! by which such licensees were deemed to be tenants of the .....

Deceased Rajendrasinh Harbhamji Jadeja's Heirs Vs. Deceased Mansukhlal ...

Court : Gujarat

..... cases falling under order 2 rule 2 of code. (10) in n.r.narayan swamy v. b.francis jagan (supra), the supreme court was dealing with a case under the karnataka rent control act. it was held that successive suits can be filed by the landlord on the ground of bona fide requirement and non-payment of ..... that the parliament may consider abolishing the law of adverse possession, or at least amending and making substantial changes in the said law in the larger public interest. (3) in karnataka board of wakf v. government of india and others (supra), the supreme court, after discussing the concept of adverse possession, has held that the possession of a person claiming ..... rent. the first suit was withdrawn as not pressed, however, the second suit was not barred either by order 23 rule 1(4) of the code or section 45 of the karnataka act. (11) the judgment in mohd. akram ansari v. chief election officer and ors. (supra), .....

Lilavatiben Wd/o Eknath Rana Vs. Urmilaben Satyenkumar Zaveri Died thr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)1GLR19

..... girdhari lal chowdhury, reported in air 1963 supreme court 698, wherein it has been held as under :'the phrase 'according to law' in s. 35 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act act refers to the decision as a whole, and it not to be equated to errors of law or of fact simpliciter. it refers to the overall decision which must be ..... counsel for the parties as well as gone through the decisions of various high courts relied upon by the learned counsel for the parties in support of their respective arguments. karnataka high court has taken different view than the view taken by the rajasthan high court in the case of ram prasad v. hari narain and others reported in , whereas the ..... at all and that the plaintiff must appear in the case in her support.21.1 he further relied on the decision of karnataka high court in the case of smt. gangavva v. arjunsa, reported in air 2001 karnataka 231, wherein it has been held as under :'there is no express bar made in the provisions of c.p.c. to debar .....

Wine Shop Through Partner Kalindi P. Malhotra Vs. State of Gujarat and ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3071

..... about the respondent playing a fraud on the statute. he has failed to put forth these objections within a reasonable time after the permission was granted by the rent controller to impugn the order on the ground of the alleged fraud perpetrated by the respondent. it was observed by this court in j.r. vohra v. india ..... without jurisdiction on the basis of the principles of res judicata, estoppel and/or equity. learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of the karnataka high court reported in : 1996(88)elt348(kar) .16. it is also contended that the contention of the respondents is that the earlier show-cause notice ..... and excise department passed the order cancelling the petitioner's licences. that order was challenged by the petitioner before the state government under section 138 of the act. the order of the director, prohibition and excise holding that the petitioner has fraudulently obtained the licences by making misrepresentation and that paramjitsingh husband of the .....

Dena Bank Vs. Shri Sihor Nagarik Sahakari Bank Limited and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2008Guj110; (2008)2GLR1796

..... lease out the property. contrary to the said stipulation the tenant was put in possession and therefore by virtue of securitisation act there is no necessity of the bank resorting to provisions of the rent control act for evicting the tenant.once again, the fact situation in the said case is vitally different from one on hand. the ..... wholly unauthorized and de hors the provisions of the securitisation act. such action would, therefore, be outside the purview of the securitisation act and would be open to challenge before the civil court under ordinary civil law.38. on the other hand, learned single judge of the karnataka high court in the case of hutchison essar south ltd ..... . v. union bank of india air 2008 karnataka 14 opined that though the secured asset is in the possession of borrower, its possession can be taken in accordance with the provisions contained in sections 13 and 14 of the securitisation act, if the borrower has inducted somebody overnight only to defeat the .....

Jabal C. Lashkari Vs. O.L. of Prasad Mills Limited and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2009)1GLR158

..... in liquidation shall be paid by the secured creditor, we direct that within one month from today, the official liquidator shall supply to the secured creditor the particulars of the rent for the demised land for the period upto 31st october 2008, remaining unpaid so far, and the secured creditor -state bank of india shall deposit the amount with the official .....

Shankerbhai C. Baria Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1993)1GLR132

..... supplied.18. in the case of hameedia hardware stores (supra) the supreme court practically redrafted section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960. this was done with a view to avoiding frustration of the legislative intent in enacting the relevant provisions contained in section 10 thereof.19. it thus ..... observations flowing from the law of lord denning, l.j. have received approval from the apex court of this country in its rulings in the case of state of karnataka and ors. v. hansa corporation reported in : [1981]1scr823 and in the case of hameedia hardware stores v. b. mohan lal sowcar reported in : [1988] ..... supra) the supreme court supplied the required pause and punctuation after the word 'ad valorem' occurring in section 3 of the karnataka tax on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein act, 1979 so that the expression 'as may be specified by, the state government' would qualify both the expressions 'local area' .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)2GLR952

..... of corruption, nepotism, favouritism and misuse of government powers against the chief minister and other ministers in connection with about 40 instances/transactions. 1977state of karnataka filed suit before the hon'ble supreme court challenging the above notification of the central government.it was in the aforesaid context that the apex court ..... by the state government under section 3 of the coi act, the central government may appoint another commission in order to deal with substantially different ..... even where the state government has appointed a commission of inquiry under the coi act to inquire into an accident.18. thirdly, mr nanavati for the railway administration invoked the observations made by the apex court in state of karnataka v. union of india to the effect that even after appointment of commission .....

Bharat Foods Co-operative Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2116

..... case.10.4. mr. trivedi, ld. advocate general relied upon a case of state of karnataka v. balaji computers reported in : (2007)2scc743 . in the said case, the state of karnataka issued certain notification under the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 regarding certain tax exemption wherein 'computer and parts of computer peripherals' was the subject ..... as a whole has been deleted out from the purview of the scheme. therefore, this amendment, which is subsequently carried out in the scheme, acts counter to the arguments advanced by the respondents that the object of the scheme was to promote cooperative sector having farmer members and certain agrarian reforms. ..... the tentative eligibility as detailed verification of assets was to be carried out. on 30.11.2005 exemption certificate under section 49(2) of the gst act was issued by the sales tax commissioner in favour of the petitioners. thereafter, a team comprising of additional industries commissioner, joint industries commissioner, etc., visited .....

Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

..... as any fetter or restriction upon the powers of the state legislature to define person and adopt a meaning different from as defined in the general clauses act. karnataka bank limited v. state of a.p., (2008) 2 scc 254. 36.3 the maxim reddendo singular singulis will apply to the interpretation of ..... and international investment agreements. whenever, a foreign investor operates within the territory of a host country, the investor and its properties are subject to the legislative control of the host country, along with the international treaties or agreements. even, if the foreign investor has no fundamental right, let them know, that the ..... make a substantive amendment and therefore, there was no question of it being unreasonable. 26.4 the contention of the petitioner that the central government always controlled the exploration, development and production is not correct. the psc provided discretion to the petitioner to deal with discoveries, development and working of the development area .....