Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka rent control act 2001 section 20 registration of middlemen or estate agents Court: delhi Page 1 of about 1 results (0.126 seconds)

Nirmala Devi (Since Deceased) and anr. Vs. Smt. Mohini Devi (Since Dec ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 157(2009)DLT706

..... tenant would be liable to be evicted only on the grounds as enumerated in clauses (a) to (p) of sub-section (1) of section 21 of the karnataka rent control act.c) mani subrat jain v. raja ram vohra reported in : [1980]2scr141 wherein it has been held that the expression 'tenant' includes a tenant continuing in ..... no allegation of fraud having been perpetrated by the respondents. consequently, as the petitioners are not tenants, petitioners are not entitled to protection of the delhi rent control act and the judgments passed by the civil judge and the additional district judge are neither a nullity nor without jurisdiction.15. in fact, after hearing the parties ..... and judgment sought to be enforced was a nullity as it was without jurisdiction by virtue of sections 14 and 15 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the drc act') and, therefore, the execution proceedings were not maintainable.3. in this connection, mr. kalia pointed out that the disputes between pt. .....

Lg Electronics Ltd. Vs. Usha (India) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi231; [2008]144CompCas504(Delhi)

..... proceedings for eviction of the appellant company were pending and the appellant company was in occupation of the premises only as a statutory tenant governed by the provisions of the karnataka rent control act. in smt. gian devi anand v. jeevan kumar and ors. 1985 suppl. (1) scr 1, this court has laid down that the termination of a contractual ..... tenancy does not bring about a change in the status and legal position of the tenant unless there are contrary provisions in the relevant rent act and the tenant, notwithstanding the termination of tenancy, does enjoy an estate or interest in the tenanted premises.13. the court, thus, held that the premises leased ..... bench. we extract the relevant portion of that judgment as well in order to appreciate the reasons given by karnataka high court in support of its aforesaid views:6. the only facet of section 22(1) of the act can be said to be of some relevant to the present appeal is that relief for recovery of money .....

Mrs. Asha Rohtagi and ors. Vs. Erstwhile New Bank of India Through Gen ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT538; 2005(82)DRJ12

..... granted by the appellant. esso company was merged into respondent corporation on 14.3.197. the appellant filed eviction petition under section 21(1)(f) of the karnataka rent control on the ground of sub-letting, assignment parting with possession . the courts below dismissed the application on the ground that the esso company had not sub-set ..... of india is directed against order dated 15.2.2005 passed by shri s.m. chopra, additional rent control tribunal whereby tenant's appeal was allowed and the eviction order under section 14(1)(b) of delhi rent control act (for short the ' act') passed by learned arc vide order dated 24.11.2004 in eviction petition no. e-288/ ..... date and as a result thereof respondent no. 1 took possession of the premises on february 24, 1961. the landlord/ appellant filed an application under the delhi rent control act for eviction of laxmi bank. an order for eviction was passed in favor of the landlord/ appellant. respondent no. 1 filed a suit for declaration that he .....

Satyawati Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi509; 100(2002)DLT259

..... it was submitted that with the passage of time and change of circumstances the continued operation of an act which was valid were (sic when) enacted may become invalid as being arbitrary and unreasonable. though karnataka rent control act was enacted in the year 1961 and was to lapse by the end of 10 years' time, ..... it has been extended from time to time in the same form in which it was enacted originally or with some modification wherever it was necessary. we cannot imagine that the legislature was not aware or conscious of the fact as to the rents ..... that there is a basic reasonable classification between the premises let for residential purpose and the premises 'not let for' residential purposes running throughout the rent control act, 1958 before its amendment and after its amendment and this classification is reasonable and in view of this classification there may be difference in their .....

Avneesh Sood Vs. Tithi Sood

Court : Delhi

..... alleging breach of the undertaking by the respondent/tenant, and praying for initiation of contempt proceedings. 51. the defence taken by the tenant was that the eviction petition under the karnataka rent control act, as initially filed, was not maintainable and that the landlord should have preferred a civil suit forejectment after terminating the tenancy under the provisions of the transfer of property ..... proceedings, the supreme court upheld the said provision. the tenant, therefore, argued that since section 31 of the karnataka rent control act was declared by the supreme court to be valid, the eviction proceedings could not be instituted by resort to the provisions of the karnataka rent control act. it was argued that the eviction decree passed against the tenant was itself a nullity, as it had been .....

The Vaish Coop. Adarsha Bank Ltd. Vs. Sudhir Kumar JaIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... tenant can neither be assigned nor transferred. this means that the interest of the statutory tenant in the premises in his occupation, as governed by the karnataka rent control act is a limited interest which enables the surviving spouse or any son or daughter or father or mother of a deceased tenant who had been living with ..... became tenants as per the definition of the tenant under the delhi rent control act. there is statutory prohibition under the delhi rent control act against any assignment of the tenancy rights may be by way of a will in favor of one of the legal heirs. therefore, ..... of subletting as a ground of eviction in this case can only be examined in relation to the provisions of delhi rent control act and not in relation to the rent acts in other states. under the delhi rent control act commercial tenancy is inheritable and, therefore, on the death of the deceased shri jugmohinder lal jain all his legal heirs .....

Jai Kumar Arya & Ors. Vs.chhaya Devi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... by the supreme court (civil appeal 126/1992) was preferred by scm. 67.14 in the interregnum, the church filed an eviction petition, under section 21(1) of the karnataka rent control act, 1961, against scm. scm moved an application, therein, under section 151 of the cpc, read with section 22 of the sica, seeking stay of the proceedings on the ..... necessarily to be spelt out in the special notice issued under section 115 of the act. in this context, reference may usefully be made to a judgement of a learned single judge of the high court of karnataka in sri b. g. somayaji v karnataka bank ltd, air1995kant 344, which was carried in appeal to the supreme court. in ..... to the respondent therein (hereinafter referred to as the church ). scm committed default in payment of rent and, on its failing to purge the default despite communications from the church, the church issued a notice, under section 434 of the act, to scm and followed it up with a petition, seeking winding up of scm, filed before .....

Khemka and Company (Agencies) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Santosh Surana

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)821; 69(1997)DLT783; 1997(43)DRJ725

..... (4) in the case of p.v.papanna & others vs . k.padmanabhaiah, : [1994]1scr642 , while dealing with a case under section 21(1) of the karnataka rent control act in respect of the non-residential premises, the supreme court held that 'the present need must exist not only on the date of filing eviction suit/petition but must also ..... nandi, j. (1) in this petition under section 25-b(8) of the delhi rent control act (hereinafter referred to as the act), the petitioner (original respondent) has been challenging the legality of the decree in ejectment passed under section 14(1)(e) of the act. (2) it has been contended by mr.anand, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that ..... thakordas and others v. chimanlal maganlal telwala, reported in 1976 r.c.r. 829, while dealing with the case under section 13(1)(g) of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947, over-ruling phool rani & others vs . naubat rai ahluwalia, : [1973]3scr679 , it is held that 'in the case of the landlord .....

Prakash Industries Limited Vs. Bajaj Auto Finance Limited

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT159; 2001(59)DRJ540

..... and circumstances of that case as it related to leased premises, the lease of which had been terminated but the occupation continued as a result of the protection granted under karnataka rent control act. mr. chandhiok specifically referred to para 13 and 15 of the said judgment. it was further contended that subsequent judgments of this court following the supreme court judgment in ..... advanced by learned senior counsel for the appellant. the ratio of the judgment of supreme court is not restricted to only leased premises protected by the provisions of a rent control act. in fact in the present case the period of lease agreement has now expired and yet the appellant has continued to be in possession and use of the wind- ..... ordersanjay kishan kaul, j. 1. the appellant seeks protection under sick industrial companies (special provision) act, 1985 (referred to as sica) not only for the purposes of not paying the laser rentals but also as remedy not to handover the wind-mills being the subject .....

Wipro Finance Ltd. Vs. M/S. Dee Pharma Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)967; 86(2000)DLT45; 2000(54)DRJ199

..... church of south india trust association, madras : [1992]2scr999 where the question was whether a landlord could seek eviction of the sick industrial company under the karnataka rent control act, 1961. it was held that the interest of a sick company which is continuing in occupation of the premises as a statutory tenant by virtue of the said ..... rent act cannot be regarded as property of the company for the purpose of sub-section (1) of section 22 of the sica. in other words, there ..... handling, air filtration system of bulk & sterile formulation plant. 1 set linear vial washer with in feed loading platform, unscrambler, pumps, filters, controls etc. & sterilizing tunnel with drying-sterilizing-cooling stabilizing zones,electrical control panel, s.s. biopragm. for which lease agreement no. 03/blr/l/088 dated 25.3.1995 was entered into. the respondent was .....