Court : Guwahati
..... , however, on their claim direction of high court granting relief of regularisation was held to be justifiable in the light of provisions of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution in that undertaking was not as a matter of statutory right, of the workmen but to eradicate unfair labour practice and to undo social injustice and as a measure of labour welfare and imposition of certain conditions as to eligibility for the benefit of the relief.80. ..... nilakkar (supra) in special facts and circumstances when the burden of deployment was on the employer to show that the deployment of workman in government project or scheme was under a stipulated contractual manner and the workman/employee was the section 2(00) of industrial disputes act and the termination was said to be retrenchment.88. ..... the supreme court again reiterated aforementioned view in karnataka state private college stop-gap lectures (supra).26. ..... worked for three years they can not claim regularisation as a matter of right and the regularisation cannot be made as a thumb of rule, and this court relegated the matter for adjudication and avail the alternative remedy for claiming the relief in reference to section 25-f of the industrial disputes act.33. ..... f.10(16)fin(g)/99 agartala, march 22, 2001memorandumsubject : - introduction of special scheme for regularisation of daily rated workers, contingent workers, etc.the question of regularisation of daily rate/contingent, etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!