Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : [1999]98CompCas683(P& H); [2000(84)FLR538]
..... the controversy was vis-a-vis the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971. ..... official liquidator [1994] 81 comp cas 780, and, while dealing with sub-section (1) to section 529 of the companies act, the supreme court concluded as under (page 783) : 'the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 529 inserted by the amendment act clearly provides that 'the security of every secured creditor shall be deemed to be subject to a pari passu charge in favour of the ..... the supreme court held as under (page 763 of 35 comp cas) : 'it is in view of the exclusive jurisdiction which sub-section (2) of section 446 of the companies act confers on the company court to entertain or dispose of any suit or proceeding by or against a company or any claim made by or against it that the restriction referred to in sub-section (1) has been imposed on the commencement of the proceedings or proceeding with such proceedings against a company after a winding up order has ..... raised was as to if in such like cases, in an eviction application under section 14a of the delhi rent control act permission of the competent authority under the slum areas (improvement and clearance) act was also required or not. ..... of the court is consistent with the view taken in recent judgments of the high courts of karnataka, kerala and gujarat.' 23. ..... act, 1956, is not applicable to the state financial corporations acting and invoking their powers under sections 29 and 31 of the state financial corporations act. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR2002P& H123
..... when the government proceeds under section 9 of the act to resume the land or building the government proceeds under the punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 1959. ..... counsel for the respondent on the other hand submitted that in thiscase only allotment had been made in favour of nihal chand duggal and no conveyance deed had been executed in his favour by the estate officer, chandigarh and as such on the request of nihal chand duggal accompanied by his sworn affidavit, the allotment was transferred in favour of his son baldev kumar duggal and no sale deed by nlhal chand duggal ..... as damages for the unauthorised use and occupation of these premises for the period 8-1-1986 to 7-2-1986 i.e, till the filing of the suit and they are liable to pay damages at the said rate till the demised premises is vacated by them. ..... muruganatha mudaliar, air 1953 sc 495, the hon'ble supreme court held that a mitakshara father is not only competent to sell his self-acquired immovable property to a stranger without the concurrence of his sons but he can make a gift of such property to one of his own sons to the detriment of another and he can ..... held in karnataka board of ..... the report, the hon'ble supreme court has observed that section 9 confers power to resume the site. ..... bibi hazra, air 1974 sc 171, it was held as under by the hon'ble supreme court (at page 172) : 'it is well established that the burden of proving that a particular sale is benami and the apparent purchaser is not .....
Tag this Judgment!