Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1974 section 3 appointment of competent officers Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 2 results (0.108 seconds)

Mohd. HussaIn and Etc. Vs. Rajasthan Board of Muslim Wakf

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj266; RLW2004(2)Raj749; 2003(3)WLC704

..... aligarh muslim university, 1987 all lj 960, wherein the appointment of a professor of chemistry of aligarh muslim university as an estate officer under the public, premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 was upheld. ..... thus, the words 'or officers of equivalent rank of statutory authority' used in clause (a) of section 3 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 are of the same category as the words 'gazetted officers of the govt. ..... in that case, the validity of section 3 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 was challenged on the ground that it does not lay down any qualification of estate officer and leaves the matter entirely to the unbriddled discretion of the central govt ..... two writ petitions are by unsuccessful occupants of wakf properties, which are public premises within the meaning of section 2(b)(viii) of the rajasthan public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1964 (act no. ..... 'the court further observed :'when section 3 of the act authorises the appointment of an officer of a statutory body concerned as estate officer, and the officer so appointed alone is competent to issue notice under section 4 and pass order under section 5 of the act, it would be a case of statutory exception to the applicability of the rules of natural justice ..... a somewhat similar controversy in different shades also arose before karnataka high court in the indian bank v. ..... greater bombay municipality, air 1974 sc 2009. .....

T.F. Pardiwala and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and M.K. Gupta

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)222

..... the provisions of public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act (hereinafter referred to as the act) were initiated against shri gupta and an order of eviction was passed. ..... case (supra) it was observed by their lordships of the supreme court while dealing with the words 'sufficient ground for proceedings' as follows:it was held by them while considering the true scope of section 203 of the old code that the magistrate was not bound to accept the result of an enquiry or investigation and he must apply his mind to the judicial material on which he forms his judgment ..... further contended that even if some incident took place, it was of minor nature, and the case was such which is covered under section 95, ipc as the harm is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would make a complaint of such harm. ..... the four accused were present and they pressed him to withdraw the complaint which he had filed against the chief security officer and pritam singh inconnection with the breaking open the locks of his quarter. ..... of inherent powers for securing the ends of justice naturally vary from case to case and a jurisdiction as wholesome as one conferred by section 482 ought not to be encased within the straight-jacket of a rigid formula.5. ..... gupta had filed a complaint against the chief security officer and pritam singh accused-petitioners for broking open the lock of his quarter, and he had been called by the accused-petitioners to exert pressure on him ..... of karnataka v. .....

Mohammed Yunus Vs. Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1999Raj334; 1999(3)WLC645; 1999(1)WLN552

..... preferred the aforesaid writ petition on 30-4-99 mainly on the ground that he had been inducted by the licencee in 1991 and, thus, he had not made any encroachment and he cannot be removed under the provisions of the act, 1959 as the only due process, by which he could be removed, was under the provisions of the rajasthan public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act, 1964') as the public premises, as defined under section 2 (b) (ii) includes the premises belonging to an improvement trustestablished under the ..... though, undoubtedly, the provisions of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 were also attracted/applicable in respect of such ..... sum and substance, on the basis ofabove, we uphold the judgment under challenge,on reaching the inescapable conclusion that competent authority of the uit, in exercise of its powers under section 92-a of the act of 1959, can cause removal of trespasser/unauthorised occupant from public land, public street or public amenities of public use, after adopting a just, fair and reasonable procedure. ..... the authorised officer, urban improvement trust, jodhpur, onor before 20-9-1999. ..... state of karnataka, air 1991 sc 1726; ramjas foundation ..... , air 1974 sc 1924, the hon'ble supreme court has observed that any provision of law which is based on public policy, has to be given a strict adherence for the reason that the same has been enacted to protect the interest of the community as a .....

Sanjay Tyagi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... can initiate proceedings under the rajasthan premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1964 (in short the act of 1964). ..... every such objection to the notice given under sub-section (2) shall be made in writing to the officer-on-special duty, or any other officer appointed by the state government for the purpose. ..... the previous permission in writing of the competent authority, transfer or purport to transfer by sale, mortgage, gift, lease or otherwise any land or part thereof situated in the state of rajasthan, which is proposed to be acquired in connection with the scheme and in relation to which a declaration to the effect that such land or part thereof is needed for a public purpose having been made by the state government under section 6 of the rajasthan land acquisition act, 1953 or under the corresponding provision of ..... therein, the first litigation was initiated by somashekar reddy, wherein the division bench of karnataka high court formulated as many as six issues for its decision. ..... act, was published in the official gazette in the year 1974, and after its publication the property/land vested absolutely to the state government free from all ..... thereafter, a notification was issued on 11.07.1974 indicating that as per provision of section 54(4) of the act of 1959, the land vests in the government from the date of gazette notification under section 52(1) of uit act of 1959. ..... in the notification and subsequent circular dated 11.07.1974, the word vacant land has been used .....