Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... amendment sub-section (3) states that only the special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed situated alone is competent to take cognizance in respect of the offence of land grabbing or determination of questions of title and ownership or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv- a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964. ..... it would be necessary to extract the substituted provision of section 9(5)(b) at the cost of repetition and it reads:"(b) the special court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary manner any offence under this act: provided that, if the special court is of the opinion that there are 577 no sufficient grounds for proceding, the court shall dismiss the complaint or drop further proceedings and in every such case it ..... is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not in force at the time of commission of the offence. ..... the said sri n.j.joseph is said to have conveyed half share in his property in favour of petitioner no.2 by sale deed dated 31.03.1975 and on his demise, his wife and children have executed release deed on 24.03.2010 in favour of the second petitioner and accordingly, revenue records .....
Tag this Judgment!