Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition of beggary act 1975 chapter i preliminary Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 7 results (0.055 seconds)

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

..... under dc 33(10). however, the legislative determination that such areas continue to be congested/overcrowded is not altered, in as much as even today the prohibition against the use of dp reservation tdr (tdr generated against surrender of gardens, road and public reservation areas) in the said three corridors continues. the ..... city of mumbai, came into effect and operation from 25th march, 1991, by way of notification dated 20th february, 1991. the dc regulations as originally sanctioned prohibited the use of transferable development rights ('tdr') in the form of floor space index ('fsi' available under development rights certificate ('dcr') in amongst others, the ..... also suman h.c. v. rehabilitation ministry employees housing building society ltd. reported in (1991) 4 scc 488 . in fact in khoday distilleries v. state of karnataka : (1996)1scc304 , the supreme court held that in order to hold delegated legislation as arbitrary, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary i.e. a law which .....

The State of Maharashtra Through the Slao, Upper Godavari Project, Kar ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR264; 2008(6)BomCR706; 2008(6)MhLj766

..... made and the party has knowledge about its ingredients, the time limit on a realistic interpretation would commence from that date and has expired on lapse of six months. prohibition of limitation in a statute is normally to be construed strictly and the equitable or ethical consideration would not normally be with the courts in giving it totally a ..... before the land acquisition act while making an application under section 18(3)(b) of the act. we have held in agreement with the earlier division bench of the karnataka high court, that the right to have a reference enforced through court or through the deputy commissioner becomes extinguished on the expiry of three years and 90 days from ..... act would not be available since the consequence of not enforcing the right to have a reference made on the scheme of section 18 of the act, as obtaining in karnataka, is to put an end to the right to have a reference at all. since in that sense it is an extinguishment of the right, the right cannot .....

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

..... competent authority(writ petition no.3815/2010 decided on 26.10.2010)considered similar circulars issued by the competent authority after the repeal of the principal act, prohibiting registration of conveyances in respect of flats constructed under schemes sanctioned under section 20 and sold without obtaining extension of periods of completion of the schemes or ..... not get protection of section 6 of the general clauses act. in ambalal sarabhai enterprises (supra), the supreme court quoted its decision in m. s. shivananda vs. karnataka srtc (1980) 1 scc 149) in this connection, which in turn quoted the eloquent observations of the privy council in the case of director of public works vs ..... v/s state of maharashtra, in special leave to appeal (civil) no.35883/2012 decided on 31.03.2014 by the honourable supreme court. 5. government of karnataka v/s gowramma and others, reported in air 2008 sc 863. 32. on the other hand, mr. khambata, learned advocate general appearing on behalf of the state .....

ici India Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR387; (1993)IILLJ568Bom

..... constitution to ensure that the extra-ordinary constitutional power granted to the high court is not constrained to the strait-jacket of the five writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, qua warranto and certiorari. if occasion arises, the high court can and ought to act even beyond the limits of the five enumerated writs, in the submission of the learned ..... :- 1. penki (up) fertilizers, catalysts2. comic (bihar) explosives3. rishra (w. bengal) paints, rubber,chemicals4. hyderabad (a.p.) paints5. thane (maharashtra) polyester fibrespeciality chemicals6. ennore (tamil nadu) pharmaceuticals,agro-chemicals7. bangalore (karnataka) seeds3. the petitioner employs about 8,500 employees in its establishments all over india. out of these 8,500 employees, it has categorised about 517 as management staff required to .....

Surendra M. Khandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2001]76ITD121(Mum)

..... it has been observed as follows :'in india, as in england, where the test of admissibility of evidence lies in relevancy, unless there is an express or necessarily implied prohibition in the constitution or other law, evidence obtained as a result of illegal search or seizure is not liable to be shut out. even though, a search and seizure ..... however, refer to some of the important cases cited by the learned counsel for the assessee. the learned counsel for the assessee referred to the decision of the honble karnataka high court in the case of nenmal shankarlal parmer (supra) and mentioned that in this case the honble high court held that when the warrant was issued to search ..... , and in this context, reliance is placed upon the decision of the punjab and haryana high court in the case of sant lal (supra) and that of the karnataka high court in the case of union home products ltd. (supra). objection is taken even to the raising of additional grounds in respect of the levy of interest under .....

Blue Coast Hotels Limited Vs. IFCI Limited

Court : Mumbai

..... and/or defaulters and/or enforced as contemplated under the act if "security interest" is created in agricultural land. 56. there is no bar and/or prohibition that financial institutions/banks cannot invoke other laws and/or related provisions for enforcement of security interest. section 37 contemplates the application of other laws for recovery of ..... land for agricultural purposes, cannot be said to have converted the nature of the land. the apex court in that case specifically held, thought referring to the karnataka land reforms act, 1962 and related provisions, that no agricultural land can be used and treated as non-agricultural land without obtaining prior permission. "6 section 95 ..... it to be so, would not convert the agricultural land into a non-agricultural land for the purposes either of the revenue act or of the act, viz., karnataka land reforms act. to hold otherwise would defeat the object of both the acts and would, in particular, render the provisions of section 95(2) of the .....

Surendra M. Khandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... it has been observed as follows :- "in india, as in england, where the test of admissibility of evidence ties in relevancy, unless there is an express or necessarily implied prohibition in the constitution or other law, evidence obtained as a result of illegal search or seizure is not liable to be shut out. even though a search and seizure may ..... , refer to some of the important cases cited by the learned counsel for the assessee. the learned counsel for the assessee referred to the decision of the hon'ble karnataka high court in the case of the nenmal shankarlal parmer (supra) and mentioned that in this case the hon'ble high court held that when the warrant was issued ..... attracted, and in this context reliance is placed upon the decision of the punjab and haryana high court in the case of sant lal (supra) and that of the karnataka high court in the case of union home products ltd. (supra). objection is taken even to the raising of additional grounds in respect of the levy of interest under .....