Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 112 articles seized Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 53 results (0.114 seconds)

Mahendra Modi Vs. Gobardhan Lal

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2006Jhar124; [2004(4)JCR603(Jhr)]

..... of the applicant-respondent on 15.3.2004, which is to the effect that the opposite party-appellant was found guilty for the offence under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 by the court of shri s.n. gupta, additional sessions judge, delhi and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine ..... an interference therein. in support of his contention reliance has been placed upon the ratio of the cases of a.v. venkatakrishnaiah and anr. v. s.a. sathyakumar, air 1978 karnataka 220, bimla devi v. subhas chandra yadav 'nirala', 1991 (1) pljr 187, mrs. elizabeth dinshaw v. arvind m. dinshaw and anr., (1987) 1 scc 42 and kirtikumar maheshankar joshi v ..... child had re-solemnized his marriage and a son was also born to him from his subsequently married wife. in the facts of the said case, the division bench of karnataka high court has thus observed :-'where the minor is subject to the hindu laws. section 13 of the hindu minority and guardianship .....

Suresh Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR274(Jhr)]

..... act, 1992 was under consideration before the karnataka high court. section 5 of that act empowers the government to issue directions notwithstanding anything contained in any ..... institution or to hold examination unless the institution obtained recognition in accordance with the provisions of section 14 of the act.10. in the case of 'amrith educational and cultural society, bangalore and anr. v. state of karnataka and anr., air 1997 karnataka 44, the provision of section 5 of the karnataka prohibition of admission of students to the un-recognized and unaffiliated educational institutions .....

Surendra Mohan Prasad and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioner no. 3 had also lodged a criminal case under various provisions of indian penal code -3- including section 498 a as also the provisions under the dowry prohibition act, in which the complainant-o.p. no. 2 was convicted, which was subsequently affirmed in appeal. the animosity and sour relationship of both the sides are evident by ..... with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge." in the case of state of karnataka vs. l. muniswamy and others, reported in (1977) 2 scc699 observations were made with respect to the powers of the high court under section 482 of cr.p ..... his in laws. even otherwise, the conviction of the complainant-opposite party no. 2 under section 498a of the indian penal code and under section 3/4 of dowry prohibition act and its subsequent confirmation in appeal leads credence to the fact that it was the complainant-opposite party no. 2, who had tortured his wife ( petitioner no.3) .....

Ganesh Kumar Garodia and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... including the first information report registered against the petitioners under sections 498(a), 323, 504/34 of the indian penal code and sections 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act in connection with dumka (town) p.s. case no. 74 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. case no. 542 of 2013.2. the details of the ..... garodia 2. smt. manju garodia, wife of sri ganesh kumar garodia 3. vikash garodia, son of sri ganesh kumar garodia all are residents 3182, second stage, kumar swami layout, bangalore (karnataka) . . petitioners --versus 1. state of jharkhand 2. smt. shweta garodia, daughter of pawan kumar patwari, resident of bhagalpur road, po & ps- dumka (town), district- dumka ..... relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. the hypertechnical view would be counterproductive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. there is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to quash .....

Dasrath Sao and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4336; II(2001)DMC540

..... and it was not a case of suicide.accordingly, first information report was lodged under section 304b of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. the investigation started and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted against the accused persons.3. the appellants appeared in the court below. charge for the ..... offences under sections 304b/34, 498a/34 of the indian penal code and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act read with section 34 of the indian penal code was framed against the appellants to which they pleaded not guilty. witnesses were examined. after having heard from both ..... is homicidal death those of section 306, i.p.c. are suicidal death and abetment thereof.14. equally in the case of shamnsaheb m. multtani v. state of karnataka, air 2001 sc 921 : 2001 cri lj 1075, it was observed to this extent that the charge was framed against the accused for the offences under sections 302, .....

Sanjay Kumar Agarwal Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2733; (2010)ILLJ343Jhar

..... in c.l.a. case no. 262(a)/2005 whereby and whereunder he took cognizance of the offence under section 14 of the child labour (prohibition and regulation) act, (hereinafter referred to as the 'act').2. it appears that an official complaint was filed in the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad by the labour superintendent, dhanbad alleging therein ..... maintained the notice board as well as the register. it is not in dispute that working of a child labour in a brick-kiln is prohibited under section 3 of the aforesaid act. it is stated in the complaint petition that the show cause filed by the petitioner is not satisfactory and therefore the present complaint has been ..... working in the brick-kiln, can not be accepted at this stage. it has been held by their lordships of supreme court in m. narayan das v. state of karnataka : (2003) 11 scc 251 thatit is settled law that the power to quash must be exercised very sparingly and with circumspection. it must be exercised in the rarest .....

Dilip Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(2)BLJR1059; [2005(2)JCR293(Jhr)]

..... teachers education college (control and regulation) ordinance, 1980 (bihar ordinance 40, 1980)' followed by 'non-government primary teachers education college (control and regulation) act, 1981; prohibiting opening of private primary teachers education institutions without prior permission of the state government, stringent penal provisions, -such as, imprisonment of three years or fine ..... of law and different decisions, rendered by the supreme court, including the case of t.m.a. pai foundation and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors., reported in jt 2002 (9) sc 1, held rule 4(kha) against the public interest and struck down the said provision, leaving ..... prescribed under proviso to rule 4(ga), wherein, provision was also made to appoint untrained teachers in special circumstance. it was submitted that the order prohibiting appointment of any untrained teacher, as has been made by the secretary, primary and secondary education, human resources development department, government of jharkhand, .....

Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited Vs. their Workmen Represented by ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2155; [2008(4)JCR195(Jhr)]

..... been adopting such process of obtaining services of the respondent-workmen, taking advantage of the fact that there is no notification under the contract labour abolition act, prohibiting the employment of the contract labour under the petitioner-company.the above facts have been recorded by the tribunal in its findings, which is based on ..... ors. reported in 2006 lab. i.c. 1302(iv) nehru yuva kendra sangathan v. rajesh mohan sukla and ors. reported in : air2007sc2509 .(v) secretary, state of karnataka and ors. v. uma devi and ors. reported in : (2006)iillj722sc .8. learned counsel argues that the ratio in the case of uma devi (supra) would not ..... ors. reported in : (2001)iillj1087sc .(ii) municipal corporation of greater mumbei v. k.v. shramik sangh and ors. reported in : (2002)iillj544sc .(iii) secretary, state of karnataka v. uma devi and ors. reported in : (2006)iillj722sc .(iv) hindustan steel works construction ltd. v. commissioner of labour and ors. reported in : (1997)illj656sc .(v) .....

Rajesh Dubey Alias Rajesh Kumar Dubey Vs. The State of Jharkhand and A ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... mr. page, but seems to rest on no foundation. a court cannot be competent to hear and determine a prosecution the institution of which is prohibited by law and section 14 prohibits the institution of a prosecution in the absence of a proper sanction. the learned magistrate was no doubt competent to decide whether he had jurisdiction to ..... been taken by j.m.ist class. learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the judgment of hon ble supreme court in the case of nanjappa vs. state of karnataka, reported in (2015)14 scc-18 and referred para-15 of the said judgment, which reads as under : in yusofalli mulla noorbhoy case, the privy council was ..... into consideration that the appellant has relied upon the judgment of hon ble supreme court in nanjappa vs. state of karnataka (supra) regarding obtaining of sanction for prosecution under section 19 of the prevention of corruption act. but it appears that at the time of passing of impugned order this fact has not been challenged by the appellant .....

Idbi Bank Limited Through Its Regional Head Cum Dy General Manager Sri ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the service condition under which, they function under the petitioner bank. reliance has also been placed upon section 36ad of part iib of the banking regulation act, 1949 which reads as under: part iib prohibition of certain activities in relation to banking companies36d. punishments for certain activities in relation to banking companies._ (1) no person shall - (a) ..... the country, the petitioner bank has been compelled to seek emergent relief in the nature of restraint order upon the respondent associations from the hon'ble high court of karnataka at bengaluru in writ petition no. 16332/2016 vide order dated 24.03.2016 (annexure- 2), also before the hon'ble high court of delhi at new ..... the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the material facts pleaded and gone through the interim order passed by the high court of karnataka, delhi and bombay. the notice to go on strike at such a crucial period of closing of the financial year from 28.03.2016 i.e. today .....