Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 105 arrest without warrant Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 14 results (0.326 seconds)

Mahendra Modi Vs. Gobardhan Lal

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2006Jhar124; [2004(4)JCR603(Jhr)]

..... of the applicant-respondent on 15.3.2004, which is to the effect that the opposite party-appellant was found guilty for the offence under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 by the court of shri s.n. gupta, additional sessions judge, delhi and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine ..... an interference therein. in support of his contention reliance has been placed upon the ratio of the cases of a.v. venkatakrishnaiah and anr. v. s.a. sathyakumar, air 1978 karnataka 220, bimla devi v. subhas chandra yadav 'nirala', 1991 (1) pljr 187, mrs. elizabeth dinshaw v. arvind m. dinshaw and anr., (1987) 1 scc 42 and kirtikumar maheshankar joshi v ..... child had re-solemnized his marriage and a son was also born to him from his subsequently married wife. in the facts of the said case, the division bench of karnataka high court has thus observed :-'where the minor is subject to the hindu laws. section 13 of the hindu minority and guardianship .....

Suresh Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR274(Jhr)]

..... act, 1992 was under consideration before the karnataka high court. section 5 of that act empowers the government to issue directions notwithstanding anything contained in any ..... institution or to hold examination unless the institution obtained recognition in accordance with the provisions of section 14 of the act.10. in the case of 'amrith educational and cultural society, bangalore and anr. v. state of karnataka and anr., air 1997 karnataka 44, the provision of section 5 of the karnataka prohibition of admission of students to the un-recognized and unaffiliated educational institutions .....

Surendra Mohan Prasad and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioner no. 3 had also lodged a criminal case under various provisions of indian penal code -3- including section 498 a as also the provisions under the dowry prohibition act, in which the complainant-o.p. no. 2 was convicted, which was subsequently affirmed in appeal. the animosity and sour relationship of both the sides are evident by ..... with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge." in the case of state of karnataka vs. l. muniswamy and others, reported in (1977) 2 scc699 observations were made with respect to the powers of the high court under section 482 of cr.p ..... his in laws. even otherwise, the conviction of the complainant-opposite party no. 2 under section 498a of the indian penal code and under section 3/4 of dowry prohibition act and its subsequent confirmation in appeal leads credence to the fact that it was the complainant-opposite party no. 2, who had tortured his wife ( petitioner no.3) .....

Ganesh Kumar Garodia and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... including the first information report registered against the petitioners under sections 498(a), 323, 504/34 of the indian penal code and sections 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act in connection with dumka (town) p.s. case no. 74 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. case no. 542 of 2013.2. the details of the ..... garodia 2. smt. manju garodia, wife of sri ganesh kumar garodia 3. vikash garodia, son of sri ganesh kumar garodia all are residents 3182, second stage, kumar swami layout, bangalore (karnataka) . . petitioners --versus 1. state of jharkhand 2. smt. shweta garodia, daughter of pawan kumar patwari, resident of bhagalpur road, po & ps- dumka (town), district- dumka ..... relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. the hypertechnical view would be counterproductive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. there is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to quash .....

Dasrath Sao and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4336; II(2001)DMC540

..... and it was not a case of suicide.accordingly, first information report was lodged under section 304b of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. the investigation started and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted against the accused persons.3. the appellants appeared in the court below. charge for the ..... offences under sections 304b/34, 498a/34 of the indian penal code and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act read with section 34 of the indian penal code was framed against the appellants to which they pleaded not guilty. witnesses were examined. after having heard from both ..... is homicidal death those of section 306, i.p.c. are suicidal death and abetment thereof.14. equally in the case of shamnsaheb m. multtani v. state of karnataka, air 2001 sc 921 : 2001 cri lj 1075, it was observed to this extent that the charge was framed against the accused for the offences under sections 302, .....

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... rejection are concerned. in support of his submission, learned counsel has relied upon the judgment in the case of sandur manganese and iron ores limited versus state of karnataka and others [(2010) 13 scc1.43. referring to the provisions under section 8a(5) / 8a(6) specifically subject to clause, it is submitted that it ..... from the insight into the judgment rendered in the case of goa foundation (supra), parliamentary intent evident from the amendment act would show that the focus and emphasis is on regulating the mining operations and not prohibit / ban it, so as to ensure continuity in operation without hiatus. learned counsel has also placed a communication ..... the case of k.r.c.s. balakrishna chetty & sons & co. versus the state of madras [air1961sc1152also see (1961) 2 scr736 on the proposition that the benefit of extension provided under the amended act is clearly contingent upon the compliance of the terms and conditions of the lease. in absence whereof, petitioner cannot claim an .....

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... rejection are concerned. in support of his submission, learned counsel has relied upon the judgment in the case of sandur manganese and iron ores limited versus state of karnataka and others [(2010) 13 scc1.43. referring to the provisions under section 8a(5) / 8a(6) specifically subject to clause, it is submitted that it ..... from the insight into the judgment rendered in the case of goa foundation (supra), parliamentary intent evident from the amendment act would show that the focus and emphasis is on regulating the mining operations and not prohibit / ban it, so as to ensure continuity in operation without hiatus. learned counsel has also placed a communication ..... the case of k.r.c.s. balakrishna chetty & sons & co. versus the state of madras [air1961sc1152also see (1961) 2 scr736 on the proposition that the benefit of extension provided under the amended act is clearly contingent upon the compliance of the terms and conditions of the lease. in absence whereof, petitioner cannot claim an .....

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... rejection are concerned. in support of his submission, learned counsel has relied upon the judgment in the case of sandur manganese and iron ores limited versus state of karnataka and others [(2010) 13 scc1.43. referring to the provisions under section 8a(5) / 8a(6) specifically subject to clause, it is submitted that it ..... from the insight into the judgment rendered in the case of goa foundation (supra), parliamentary intent evident from the amendment act would show that the focus and emphasis is on regulating the mining operations and not prohibit / ban it, so as to ensure continuity in operation without hiatus. learned counsel has also placed a communication ..... the case of k.r.c.s. balakrishna chetty & sons & co. versus the state of madras [air1961sc1152also see (1961) 2 scr736 on the proposition that the benefit of extension provided under the amended act is clearly contingent upon the compliance of the terms and conditions of the lease. in absence whereof, petitioner cannot claim an .....

Sanjay Kumar Agarwal Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2733; (2010)ILLJ343Jhar

..... in c.l.a. case no. 262(a)/2005 whereby and whereunder he took cognizance of the offence under section 14 of the child labour (prohibition and regulation) act, (hereinafter referred to as the 'act').2. it appears that an official complaint was filed in the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad by the labour superintendent, dhanbad alleging therein ..... maintained the notice board as well as the register. it is not in dispute that working of a child labour in a brick-kiln is prohibited under section 3 of the aforesaid act. it is stated in the complaint petition that the show cause filed by the petitioner is not satisfactory and therefore the present complaint has been ..... working in the brick-kiln, can not be accepted at this stage. it has been held by their lordships of supreme court in m. narayan das v. state of karnataka : (2003) 11 scc 251 thatit is settled law that the power to quash must be exercised very sparingly and with circumspection. it must be exercised in the rarest .....

Dilip Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(2)BLJR1059; [2005(2)JCR293(Jhr)]

..... teachers education college (control and regulation) ordinance, 1980 (bihar ordinance 40, 1980)' followed by 'non-government primary teachers education college (control and regulation) act, 1981; prohibiting opening of private primary teachers education institutions without prior permission of the state government, stringent penal provisions, -such as, imprisonment of three years or fine ..... of law and different decisions, rendered by the supreme court, including the case of t.m.a. pai foundation and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors., reported in jt 2002 (9) sc 1, held rule 4(kha) against the public interest and struck down the said provision, leaving ..... prescribed under proviso to rule 4(ga), wherein, provision was also made to appoint untrained teachers in special circumstance. it was submitted that the order prohibiting appointment of any untrained teacher, as has been made by the secretary, primary and secondary education, human resources development department, government of jharkhand, .....