Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 20 operation of other laws not barred Page 3 of about 607 results (0.273 seconds)

Basavaraj Rayappa Kengeri and Others Vs. Three Officer/Deputy Conserva ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2000Kant180; ILR2000KAR1348; 2000(2)KarLJ565

..... to utilise the land in sy. no. 26 for better cultivation, made an application on 25-10-1989 for permission to fell the trees standing in sy. no. 26 under the provisions of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (for short 'act'). the case of the petitioners is that since no order has been passed on the said application they ..... are entitled to remove the standing trees in view of the deemed permission as provided under section 8(4) of the act.3. the ..... its act no. 12 of 1998 introduced amendment to the 1976 act (hereinafter referred to as 'karnataka act no. 76 of 1976') and section 8(4) has been amended by substitution which reads as follows.-'the tree officer shall make all possible endeavour to dispose off the application received under this section within a period of three months .....

Narayan and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Uttara Kannada, Karwar and a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant273; 2002(4)KarLJ382

..... by persons who claim that they own certain extent of private lands where there is certain tree growth and who have applied to the second respondent-tree officer for permission to cut and remove those trees under section 8 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act' for short). the applications filed by ..... the petitioners to the tree officer are produced as an-nexures-a, b, c, d, e and f ..... in his capacity as the deputy commissioner of the district and for the purpose of taking suitable steps to preserve and protect the tree growth on government lands and for proper realization of the value of trees which were standing on granted lands. it is in this context, these circulars havebeen issued. it cannot be .....

B.L. Diwakar Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001CriLJ305; ILR1999KAR4693; 2000(2)KarLJ283

..... situation. he further submitted that there is nothing wrong for taking cognizance under sections 24(g) and (h) and 73(d) of the karnataka forest act, 1963, section 8 read with section 22 of the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 and section 2 read with section 3-a of the forest (conservation) act, 1980.4-a. the learned state public ..... addition be liable to pay such compensation for the damage done to the forests as the convicting court may direct to be paid. under section 73(d) of the karnataka forest act, 1963 the prescribed punishment is imprisonment which may extend to two years or with fine or with both. likewise, for the offence under section 8, the ..... and the investigation made by the second respondent including fir and the charge-sheet filed for the alleged offences under sections 24(g), (h) and 73(d) of the karnataka forest act, 1963 as amended read with forest (conservation) act, 1980, (2 read with section 3-a) of which the cognizance is taken, has preferred this petition .....

Dr. Meenakshi and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by Its Chief Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

..... or at the time of implementation of the revised master plan-2015. both the authorities have followed all the provisions contemplated in the karnataka town and country planning act and karnataka preservation of trees act and environment and ecology act and kmc act. therefore, the allegation that the proposal to widen the road is contrary to ..... bruhat bangalore mahanagara palike from proceeding with the widening of the road between cauvery junction and cnr rao circle without following the karnataka town and country planning act and the karnataka preservation of trees act and without hearing the residents of the areas around the said road. they are also seeking a direction to the respondents ..... to follow the provisions of the karnataka town and country planning act as well as the karnataka preservation of trees act. brief facts 2. the facts in brief leading to this litigation are as under: petitioner nos.1 to 5 .....

Dr V L Nandish Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... no.17877 of 2023 taken by the deputy conservator of forests. the mop is adopted to assess the trees (for more than 50 trees) pertaining to applications submitted under karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 submitted to hon'ble high court of karnataka during december 2020. e. the tree officer shall make all possible endeavors to dispose of the application received as a matter of emergency. (as ..... wp no.17877 of 2023 5. sri.n.k.ramesh, learned counsel fairly acceded to the request and thereafter the tree has been removed since there was no permission required under the karnataka preservation of trees act, 1976 which would not apply to dangerous trees. on enquiry with sri.n.k.ramesh, as to whether there is any procedure adopted by the corporation in such .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Mohammed Kunhi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1500

..... cutting and removing the trees which shall now, irrespective of the decision of respondent-2 challenged in the writ petition be considered by the 2nd respondent in the light of this judgment and on the basis that the land in question is redeemed sagu and subject to the provisions of the karnataka preservation of trees act and other laws ..... regular second appeals nos. 693 and 694 of 1977. petitions for special leave being special leave petitions nos. 3812-13 of 1985 were preferred by the state of karnataka against the said decision and the said petitions for special leave were dismissed summarily by this court on 10th march, 1986. in these circumstances, the only thing ..... all that redeemed coffee saguvali mali bearing the survey number 1/10 of 204.42 acres in area situated in kundacheri village, bhagamandala nadu, mercara taluk, coorg district, karnataka state' is a redeemed estate and also for a direction to the defendant to pay the plaintiffs a sum of rs. 3,57,777-81 with current interest .....

Shiv Raj Singh Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... deputy conservator of forest, sagar, certain allegations have been made against him in respect of tree cutting and making payment etc. in this regard, the revenue officials who were also involved in the process of tree cutting, permission etc., under the karnataka preservation of trees act, due to non-payment of certain amounts to the beneficiaries, the matter was ..... sum of rs.74,985.07 from the petitioner vide annexure-p dated 17.04.2012. consequently, the office of the principal accountant general (a and e), karnataka, communicated how the recovery is required to be made namely by 15 instalments from june 2012 to the drawing and disbursing officer of hindustan steel works construction limited ..... to take notice for respondent nos.1 to 5. the petitioner was selected and appointed to the indian forest service and allotted to the government of 3 karnataka. he was posted as asst. conservator of forest in the year 1986. he has earned promotions to various cadres and presently he is in the cadre .....

Shiv Raj Singh Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary Forest and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... conservator of forest/ sagar, certain allegations have been made against him in respect of tree cutting and making payment etc. in this regard, the revenue officials who were also involved in the process of tree cutting, permission etc., under the karnataka preservation of trees act, due to non-payment of certain amounts to the beneficiaries, the matter was ..... of rs.74,985.07 from the petitioner vide annexure-p dated 17.04.2012. consequently, the office of the principal accountant general (a and e), karnataka, communicated how the recovery is required to be made namely by 15 installments from june 2012 to the drawing and disbursing officer of hindustan steel works construction limited ..... directed to take notice for respondent nos. 1 to 5. the petitioner was selected and appointed to the indian forest service and allotted to the government of karnataka. he was posted as asst. conservator of forest in the year 1986. he has earned promotions to various cadres and presently he is in the cadre of .....

In the Matter of : Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC522; JT1991(4)SC361; 1991(2)SCALE1049; [1991]Supp2SCR497

..... be deemed fit and proper. the power given by the clause is unrestricted and uninhibited by any consideration save and except the protection and preservation of the irrigable area of the karnataka state.55. clause 4 is still more absolute in its terms and operation inasmuch as it declares that the ordinance and any rules and ..... order passed by the tribunal, the preamble of the said statute leaves no doubt that it is concerned with 'the protection and preservation of irrigation in irrigable areas of the cauvery basin in karnataka dependent on the waters of the cauvery river and its tributaries'. the provisions of the said law extracted earlier leave no manner ..... of balance of convenience and maintenance of the existing utilisation so that rights of the parties may be preserved till the final adjudication....19. the tribunal then directed the state of karnataka to release water from its reservoirs in karnataka so as to ensure that 205 tmc water is available in tamil nadu's mettur reservoir in .....

State of Karnataka and Others Vs. B. Krishna Bhat and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR2030; 2001(2)KarLJ1

..... in regard to orders relating to cubbon park and other parks, it is contended that they are covered by the karnataka government parks preservation act, 1975 and karnataka parks, play-fields and open space (preservation and regulation) act, 1985 and the orders of the learned single judge interfere with the discharge of their statutory duties ..... entry and use of vehicles and members of public during night time, etc.). (v) protection of environment and pollution control (prevention of cutting of trees, cleaning of lakes, planting trees, use of lpg instead of petrol in autorickshaws etc., garbage disposal). (vi) initiating action for violation of building bye-laws and regulations. (vii) ..... . in that letter the learned judge also stated thus: 'unlike your officers and staff, the right thinking residents of this city desire that the trees be preserved and maintained. mr. bhat has volunteered to assist the corporation in this regard and it is my suggestion that you should take advantage of his .....