Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka panchayat raj act 1993 section 200 recovery of taxes and other dues Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 23 results (0.185 seconds)

Jindal Strips Limited and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)12VST149(P& H)

..... sections 21, 75 and 137 of the panchayati raj act, which enumerate functions and duties of the gram panchayats, panchayat samitis and zila parishads respectively, are exhaustive reflection of various items specified in the ..... 6 vst 587, examined the issue with reference to the provisions of the bihar taxes on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein act, 1993 (act 16 of 1993) as adopted by the state of jharkhand vide notification dated december 15, 2000 and as amended vide jharkhand tax on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein (amendment) ordinance, 2001 and held that the levy therein was not compensatory.submissions on behalf of the state:26 ..... the high court of karnataka struck down the impugned legislation and the notification on the ground that section 3 did not empower the state government to apply the provisions of the act to certain local areas only and to exclude other local areas and that non-exemption of petty dealers amounted ..... in this case also the argument was that the act impugned there was passed by the parliament not for raising funds for the union of india but for validating the illegal recovery of cesses made by the state governments, and which funds had already gone into the consolidated funds ..... the argument that the impugned legislation was bad due to non-compliance of article 304(b) was rejected by the supreme court in the following words:the last limb of the argument is whether the proviso, to article .....

Anokh Singh and Etc. Etc. Vs. Punjab State Election Commission and ors ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2009P& H63

..... the supreme court in som lal's case : air2008sc2088 (supra) has dealt with this controversy and has held that the disqualifications prescribed under section 11 of the state election commission act shall prevail over the disqualifications prescribed under section 208 of the panchayat raj act in view of sections 142 and 143 of the state election commission act. ..... clause (g) sub-section (1) of section 208 of the panchayati raj act provides that a person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being a member of a panchayat if, he is a whole-time, salaried employee of any local authority, statutory corporation or board or a co-operative society registered under the punjab co-operative societies act, 1961 or of the state government or the central government. ..... it was further held that a strict and narrow construction may not be adopted which may have the effect of shutting off many prominent and other eligible persons to contest the elections, but at the same time in dealing with a statutory provision which imposes a disqualification on a citizen it would be unreasonable to take merely a broad and general view and ignore the essential points. ..... the supreme court in state of karnataka and ors. v. ..... learned counsel for the petitioners has further relied upon a decision of the supreme court in state of karnataka and ors. v. .....

Vaid Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... since the proviso to sub- section (1) of section 19 of the punjab panchayati raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as `the act') (as it existed at that time) provided that `no such application shall be made unless a period of two years has elapsed from the date on which the sarpanch assumed his office', the block development and panchayat officer did not entertain that application and advised those 7 members to make such application after the expiry of two years from the date on which ..... davangere city municipality, davangere and others, air 197.karnataka 140, vijay kumar saluja ..... learned counsel, a perusal of the proceedings conducted in the meeting held on 22.9.2010, which was presided over by the block development and panchayat officer, clearly indicates that on the said date, 8 members of the gram panchayat were against the sarpanch, which clearly is two-third majority of the total members of the gram panchayat, therefore, the learned single judge was not justified in setting aside the resolution of `no confidence motion' carried against respondent no.6.8. ..... of punjab and others, air 199.punjab and haryana 341 and jardar khan ..... of haryana and others, air 199.punjab and haryana 249 ..... commissioner, karnal and others, 1991 plj 635.pritam singh and others v. ..... state of punjab and others (civil writ petition no.7392 of 2011), decided on 12.5.2011, the division bench of this court held that all the resolutions passed before the said date will be deemed to ..... and others ..... of punjab and others . .....

Present: Mr. R. K. Garg Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... made to vijay kumar saluja versus the deputy commissioner, karnal and others.1991 plj 635.jardar khan versus state of haryana and others.air 199.punjab and haryana 249, shyamapada_ganguly versus abani mukharjee, air 195.calcutta 420, s.shivashankarappa and others versus the davangere city municipality, davangere and others.air 197.karnataka 140 and pritam singh and others versus state of punjab and others.air 199.punjab and haryana 341. ..... an ordinance was issued by the punjab government on 14.12.2010 deleting section 19 of the punjab panchayati raj act under which no confidence motion was passed. ..... (3) if the non-confidence motion is carried in the meeting convened under sub-section (2) which shall be presided over by the block development and panchayat officer or an officer not below the rank of social education and panchayat officer authorised by the block development and panchayat officer in this behalf, by [a two-third majority of the total number of panches ..... the block development and panchayat officer shall, within a period of fifteen days of the receipt of application under sub-section(1).convene a meeting of the [gram panchayat].by giving seven clear days in notice, for discussing and taking decision on ..... it is further averred that when it was pointed out by the panchayat secretary that 7 members out of total 11 would not constitute a two-third majority, respondent no.4 called the 7 panches and asked them to get the signatures of one more member as otherwise they may not .....

Baldev Raj Dig (Retd.) and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... learned counsel that the list of dowry articles is not signed by the parties as per the requirement of the rules framed under the dowry act, there is a contradiction in the number of the accused mentioned in the impugned fir (annexure p1) and earlier complaint (annexure p3) filed by the complainant and since the petitioners have been falsely implicated, so, the impugned fir is liable to be quashed, are neither tenable nor the observations of hon ..... in the background of these allegations and in the wake of complaint of the complainant, the present case was registered against the petitioners and their son partish raj, vide fir no.13 dated 31.12.2010 (annexure p1), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 498-a and 406 ipc by the police of police station women cell, jalandhar in the ..... all other submissions relatable to appreciation of evidence (as now sought to be urged on their behalf) and what is the effect of non-compliance of the rules framed under the dowry act, inter-alia, would be the moot points to be decided after receiving the evidence of the parties, during the course of trial ..... proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge. . 8. ..... a biradari panchayat was convened and parents of the complainant requested the accused to keep her in her matrimonial ..... karnataka .....

Philadelphia Mission Hospital Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2005(1)SLJ186(P& H)

..... counsel, appearing for the respondent-workman has argued that the petitioner-management had, at no stage, raised any controversy with regard to it being not an 'industry' under the provision of section 2(j) of the act and as such, it was not open to the petitioner-management to raise the aforesaid question, at this stage. ..... . the learned counsel has also relied upon certain observations in their separate order, made by the two judges who constituted the majority in karnataka state road transport corporation's case (supra) wherein it was observed that the restriction placed upon the management to reserve the right to adduce evidence at the first stage could not be understood ..... had found that the prosecution version was not proved.in view of the aforesaid judicial pronouncement by the criminal court, whereby the respondent-workman and all other workman had been acquitted of the charges levelled against them, the story put forward by the petitioner-management cannot be accepted.no other point has been urged.as a result of the aforesaid discussion, we find no good ground to set aside the award passed by ..... raj was leaving in his car, then the respondent-workman along with the other persons dragged him out of the car and thrashed him and ..... . similarly, the observations made in karnataka state road transport corporation's case (supra) relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner also deal with the power of the labour court/ tribunal to require the ..... the case of karnataka state road .....

Pishora Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4130

..... state of karnataka (1998) 3 rec cri r 373 : 1998 cri lj 53 a petition was filed under section 482 of the code to quash the charge-sheet and dismiss the complaint filed under section 3(1)(x) of the act and under sections 323, 448 and 506, i.p.c. ..... court, while referring the case to the larger bench on the four issues framed had extended the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner-accused after noticing the fact that civil and criminal disputes were pending between the parties and for that reason it was observed that it cannot be ruled out that the present complaint had been lodged by second respondent as counter-blast with an ulterior motive or with mala fides ..... anticipatory bail which was rejected by the court of additional sessions judge, patiala as per order dated 12-9-2001 primarily for the reason that the facts stated in the complaint involved the commission of crime under section 3 of the act and in view of the provisions of section 18 of the act, concession of anticipatory bail could not be extended to the petitioner. ..... even in the statement of the complainant and other witnesses recorded nothing had been stated in this regard. ..... thereafter a panchayat was also convened on 9/10-11-2000 where the 'accused admitted the above mentioned occurrence and felt sorry before the members of the panchayat. .....

Kartar Singh and anr. Vs. Financial Commissioner (Planning) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR261

..... challenge has been given to the orders p2 and p3 on the ground that a perusal of section 24 of the act would show that there is no basis for the authorities to say that interference can only be done when the government has interest in the compensation pool and that no period of limitation is prescribed under section 24 of the act for making a reference to the higher authorities for the cancellation of the proprietary rights in case it is found that a fraud has been played ..... shri cheema submitted that the division bench was satisfied about the prime facie illegalities committed by the chief settlement commissioner and the financial commissioner, who in the opinion of shri cheema, should be directed to re-write the order as the orders p2 and p3 have been written for extraneous reasons when both the authorities did not deal with all the arguments raised by the writ petitioners, though noted ..... produce any documentary evidence in support of his case that he purchased the land before the partition of the country from ujagar singh and also that when gurdip singh had already obtained land on the basis of the declaration on 10.1.1957 why he got a will executed from ujagar singh on 11.10.1967 in favour of pritpal singh and others, who are his sons. ..... then filed the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 27.11.1987, which was dismissed on 30.2.1993 and the judgment of the trial court dated ..... counsel for the respondent (gurdip singh) relied upon state of karnataka and ors. v. b.s. ..... panchayat .....

Ramesh Kumar Vohra and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... section 197 cr.pc, sections 13 and 19 of the p.c.act and on the peculiar facts and in the special circumstances of those cases, it was observed that if there is reasonable connection between the act complained of and ..... 1982 and 5.6.85 and his co-accused while functioning as technical member/chairman of the kerala state electricity board, thiruvananthapuram, between 1.2.84 and 30.11.85, in their capacity as such public servants, entered into a criminal conspiracy to sell electricity to the state of karnataka to be supplied to m/s graphite india limited, bangalore, karnataka state, without the consent of the government of kerala, which was an illegal act as ..... transfer on the ground of in-genuineness of the will and other documents or could direct the complainant to get his ..... whether they have been falsely implicated due to enmity, what is the evidentiary value and effect of the indicated letters and whether they have probable defence or not, would be the moot points to be decided, after the appreciation of ..... and at the time of approving the proposal, the cabinet specifically decided that the works worth more than rs.1,00,000/- shall be put to open tender while works below rs.100,000/- shall be executed through panchayat ..... the office of the defendant no.5 (huda) on 8.5.1980 and also stated the letters ex.p4 to ex.p14 issued by his office and receipt ex.p15 in the sum of rs.9,200/- also pertain to his office. ..... raj bhasin, another attesting witness to the agreement to sell ex.p1, gpa ex.p2 and .....

Lal Singh and ors. Vs. Surjit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)143PLR242

..... moreover, there is sufficient oral evidence on record which has been believed by both the courts below in the form of statement of draftsman pw-1, rup singh, member panchayat, pw-2, plaintiff-respondent pw-3, ex.pl, site plan and saudagar singh pw-4 who have supported the version of the plaintiff-respondent. ..... both the courts below further went on to hold that the site plan prepared by the plaintiff-respondent by visiting the spot would not be considered as a proof of title yet it would support and corroborate the statements made by other witnesses of the plaintiff-respondents that she has been residing in the village.5. ..... the supreme court reversed the judgment of the karnataka high court which had taken a contrary view. ..... learned appellate court has also held that best piece of evidence namely copy of the will allegedly executed by inder singh in favour of defendant-appellant and copy of the civil suit earlier filed by him in respect of the property of inder singh have been withheld by the defendant-appellate and on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of gopal krishanjit ketkar v. ..... apart from the afore-mentioned legal proposition, the judgment has to be considered relevant under section 42 of the evidence act, 1872. ..... further reliance has also been placed on a copy of the voters list ex.p-3 for the year 1993 in respect of village mulowal. .....