Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka municipal corporations act 1976 section 171 corporation may pass supplemental budget Page 10 of about 1,281 results (0.284 seconds)

Jul 03 1997 (HC)

S.N. Srinivas Murthy and ors. Vs. the Corporation of the City of Banga ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR101

..... properties are assessed for the purposes of property tax under the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976. ..... administrator, corporation of city of bangalore, : [1990]183itr569(kar) that the petitioners had an efficacious alternative remedy available to them by way of an appeal under rule 20 of schedule ml of karnataka municipal corporation rules in the light whereof the writ petitions were not ..... it is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for respondent - corporation and in my opinion rightly so that the rules do not envisage revision of annual ratable value by any authority other than ..... learned counsel appearing for respondent corporation raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the ..... commissioner, corporation of city of bangalore and another, 1990 ..... also do not permit delegation of the authority vested in the commissioner to either the assistant revenue officer or any other officer of the corporation. ..... proposing to revise the annual ratable value of the properties were served upon, the petitioners by the assistant revenue officer of the corporation. ..... the impugned orders passed by the administrator as also the proceedings initiated by the assistant revenue officer including the notices proposing to increase the annual ratable value of the properties of the petitioners are hereby ..... is no question of permitting any subordinate or other authority to exercise such powers, on the grounds of convenience or the magnitude of the work that may be involved. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1986 (HC)

Mayor, Corporation of the City of Bangalore Vs. K. Narayanaswamy

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3129

..... that act was repealed by the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976 (the 'act' for short). ..... briefly stated the facts of the case are as follow :(1) the corporation of the city of bangalore had been constituted and functioning under the city of bangalore municipal corporation act, 1949. ..... voting since its inception for the reason that under the city of bangalore municipal corporation act, 1949 the election of members of standing committee was also required to be made by direct voting and not by proportionate representation by single transferable vote and since the procedure for election to the standing committee was changed to that of election by proportionate representation under section 11(2) of the 1976 act the same method ought to have been adopted in electing the taxation appeals committee ..... rule-18 which is relevant for the purpose of this case reads :'when an objector is dissatisfied with the order passed by the commissioner under sub-rule (3) of rule-17, he may within fifteen days from the date on which such order was sent by post appeal against it to a committee called the taxation appeals committee consisting of three members of the corporation elected by it, the chairman of which committee, will also be elected.the taxation appeals committee shall have all the ..... in other words, the powers of the commission are meant to supplement rather than supplant the law (both statute and rules) in the matters of superintendence direction and control as provided by article 424. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1984 (HC)

Corporation of the City of Bangalore Vs. Bangalore Chemical and Manufa ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1984KAR272

..... 69 of 1949) (hereinafter referred to as the old act) which is now replaced by the uniform karnataka municipal corporations act of 1976 (karnataka act 14 of 1977) (hereinafter referred to as the uniform act) that came into force in the city ofbangalore on 1-6-1977, the commissioner of the corporation of the city of bangalore (hereinafter referred to as the commis-sioner) fixed the annual letting value of the said ..... of bangalore municipal corporation act, 1949 (mysore act no. ..... was a general revision of assessment of properties in the city of bangalore, in which the assistant revenue officer of the corporation (hereinafter referred to as the aro) revised the annual letting value of the building to rs. ..... aggrieved by the said order of the learned district judge, the corporation of the city of bangalore, has presented this writ petition under article 227 of ..... assessment made by the aro, the owner filed a first appeal before the deputy revenue officer, the first appellate authority under the old act, who on an examination of the same allowed the said appeal in part and reduced the annual letting value of the building to ..... 41 situated on 72nd cross road, vi block, rajajinagar, bangalore-10, or corporation division no.2 of bangalore city admittedly, the building has been constructed on or before 1-10-1969 on a site area measuring 138' x 275' and consists of a ..... the administrator, the owner filed an appeal under rule 23(a)of part-vi of schedule iii read with section 146 of the old act in m.a. no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1990 (HC)

Sri Vidya Mandir Education Society Vs. Corporation of the City of Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR2373

..... aggrieved by that fact the petitioner has challenged the numerous orders in question culminating in the proceedings before the government under section 102 of the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the act) resulting in the order dated 11-9-1984 as at annexure-g to the petition (a true copy).2. ..... not having done that, but merely following the procedure or observing the rules of natural justice, but nevertheless rendering such procedure an empty formality, the impugned order in question is passed and therefore it has been quashed and the matter is relegated back to the government to dispose of the matter afresh in the light of the discussion made in the course of this order keeping in mind the merits of the ..... at best both of them may be considered as persons seeking largess from the 1st respondent-corporation to promote the objects for which each of them have constituted themselves as a society and no more. ..... providing music as a directory or discretionary function is with reference to such amusement which the corporation may in its discretion provide to the general public living within its city limits for purpose of entertainment in a park or a music hall owned by it or any other convenient place where such music may be provided. ..... the facts leading to this petition may be stated briefly and they are as follows: such a vacant plot of land belonging to the corporation of the city of bangalore-1st respondent exists is not in dispute. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 1990 (HC)

Broadway Complex Vs. Administrator, Corporation of the City of Bangalo ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the case, in brief, are these: the main contention of the petitioner/appellant is that, in respect of the properties, in respect of which, taxes are demanded from the appellant, he was only a lessee and therefore, in view of section 112 of the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 (in short 'the act'), the primary liability to pay tax was on the lessor and therefore, the demand of property tax from the appellant was without authority of law. ..... bodies or otherwise, or towards power lighting, water licence charges or any enhanced corporation tax shall be paid by the lessee themselves.clause (6): the lessors further agree that the lessees shall be at liberty during the subsistence of this lease to make such alteration , additions, changes or other structures (without in any way impairing the safety of the premises as may be necessary for the purposes of using the premises as a boarding and lodging establishment ..... and shall also be at liberty to put-up such structure as they may deem profitable in the portion mentioned as schedule 'b' herein below). ..... he has also requested that a detailed order may be given so that basis he could approach his sub-lessees for giving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2012 (HC)

Ms.Purvankara Projects Limited, and ors. Vs. the Urban Development Dep ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of powers conferred under section 466(b) read with section 421 of karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 (for short, the act'). ..... to declare such expenses as improvement expenses is , qualified by the clause, which states as under: -'the commissioner having regard to the expenditure incurred on various infrastructural facilities provided to or to be provided, may declare it as improvement expenses under section 466 of the act and may levy and collect such improvement expenses from the owner or occupier of the properties that are assessed or newly added to the assessment register, which have been benefited or likely to be benefited ..... their arguments have been adopted and supplemented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in ..... others vs union of india & others - air 1986 sc 515, he contends that the delegated legislation passed authorizing imposition of the improvement expenses is not opposed to any recognised principles, based on which, the delegated ..... . even after a fresh exercise was done by the bbmp, pursuant to the order passed in the aforementioned writ petition, the bbmp has failed to come forward with necessary data regarding the amount expended or likely to be incurred for the purpose of providing basic amenities ..... the statement of objections that the expert committee report was placed before the standing committee (tax and finance) and the said committee has passed a resolution on 15.10.2010 reducing the improvement expenses as per annexure-r6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1988 (HC)

Dr. (Mrs) Sita Bhateja's Nursing Home Vs. District Judge

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR779; 1988(1)KarLJ366

..... the building is situated within the city of bangalore and is governed by the provisions of the karnataka municipal corporations act 1976 (for short the act). ..... learned counsel for the petitioner urged the following two points :1) that the learned single judge erred in holding that a revision petition under section 115 of the cpc lies against the order of the district court dismissing the appeal of the appellants for default.2) that as under rule 22, the district court was bound to make a reference and he failed in his ..... this writ appeal is presented against the order of the learned single judge dismissing the writ petition presented by the appellants, on the ground that a revision petition under section 115 of the cpc lies to this court against the order made by the district court bangalore.2. ..... (a) the high court may pass such order as it thinks tit on a reference under rule 22. ..... when an appeal or revision lies to a court which is subordinate to the high court, under any provision of law, a revision under section 115 of the cpc lies to this court (see shyama-raju hegde v. ..... thus the provision is similar to the provisions contained in section 256 of the income tax act.8. ..... section 110 of the act, grants general exemption from the property tax. ..... the learned judge dismissed the petition holding that the appellant had the remedy of revision under section 115 of the c.p.c.5. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2008 (HC)

Shashwathi Enterprises, a Partnership Firm Represented by Its Partner ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(6)KarLJ740; 2008(4)AIRKarR422

..... section 301 of the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976, may be seen in ..... 5.6 of the bye-laws 2003 which provide for an occupation certificate read with section 310(2) of the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976, does even contemplate a deemed grant of such a certificate if the commissioner has failed to consider the application far such a certificate ..... consider the same for grant of licence for conducting live band shows in terms of paragraph 7 of the 2005 order within a period of thirty days from today and in the event that the respondents does not pass appropriate orders within thirty days from today, the petitioners shall be at liberty to commence the live band shows in their premises in terms of the permission granted by the supreme court by its order dated 2.12.2005 ..... premises of the applicants are either fit or not fit for purposes of running live band show which the licensing authority could very well decide on the basis of an inspection or other material which the petitioners may be in a position to produce and if the respondents inspite of this time frame do not or are not in a tuition to comply with the directions of this court, it would then be possible to permit the petitioners to commence their ..... state that any permission granted to perform live band shows would lead to an escalation of other illegal activity such as prostitution, gambling, drug trafficking and drunken driving and that the state requires time to supplement its pleadings in this regard.12. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 1994 (HC)

Karnataka State Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR2968; 1994(4)KarLJ331

..... annexure 'a' has been issued under section 143 of the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 read with rules 8 and 9 ..... , the karnataka state construction corporation has filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, for the quashing of the notice issued by the respondents on 3-1-1992 ..... , bangalore city corporation to the chairman of the petitioner-corporation serving the bills and requiring the petitioner to arrange for payments of the property tax relating to the year 1991-92 and 1992-93 ..... does not appear from the counter objections that whether the petitioner-corporation had filed objections in reply to the notice issued by the bangalore city corporation. ..... notice, it has been mentioned that objections to the assessment referred to in this notice may be filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the special notice. ..... to the effect that the petitioner did file objection to provisional assessment have not been denied by the respondent-corporation. ..... notice, the petitioner has only been required to submit its objections against the assessment made by the bangalore city corporation. ..... and dispose of the petitioner's objections to the proposed assessment of properly tax according to law by a speaking order and after disposal of those objections, when final assessment has been made, the opposite parties may issue fresh notice thereof. ..... 1 has not passed any order, so far, on the objections filed by the petitioner vide annexure 'b' to the writ petition nor sent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1996 (HC)

Smt. Jayashree J. Shenoy Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR711

..... any justification issued the notice dated 30th may, 1991, the copy of which has been produced as annexure-a to this petition, directing the petitioner to cut the branches of two trees, namely, seethapal and atti trees situated in the said 25 cents of land belonging to the petitioner, in exercise of the power conferred on him under sub-section (1) of section 323 of the karnataka municipal corporation act; (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') and aggrieved by the said notice, ..... 2-3-138, has challenged the order dated 18th january, 1992, the copy of which has been produced as annexure-b passed by the standing committee of the mangalore city corporation (hereinafter referred to as the corporation) and also the covering letter dated 29th january, 1992, the copy of which has been produced as annexure-c, issued by the 2nd respondent communicating the order annexure-b dated ..... well as the standing committee of the corporation have failed to apply their mind to the relevant matters which they were required to consider before passing the impugned notice/order. ..... following order:(i) the order annexure-b dated 18th january 1992 passed by the standing committee of the mangalore city corporation is hereby quashed. ..... date of receipt of this order;(iii) the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the objections, if any, filed by the petitioner within four weeks from the date of filing of the objections and pass appropriate orders on merits after hearing the petitioner and in accordance with law. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //