Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka local authorities official language act 1981 Page 2 of about 25,413 results (0.264 seconds)

S. Udaya Shankar Vs. State Of Karnataka And Ors Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... sub-section (3) of section 12, however, provided that after the commencement of the said act, no development of land shall be undertaken or carried out in any area by anyone unless (i) where that area is a development area, permission for such development has been obtained in writing from the authority in accordance with the provisions of the act and (ii) where the area is an area other than a development area, approval of the local authority or other authority concerned is obtained according to law. ..... terms of sub-section (4) of section 3 of the khb act, khb shall be deemed to be a local authority for its purpose and also for the purpose of l.a. ..... other words, the fact that actual development is permissible in an area other than a development area with the approval or sanction of the local authority did not preclude the central government from acquiring the land for planned development under the act. ..... act, is issued by the appropriate government or by the deputy commissioner and thereafter, the said formal expression of the decision to start acquisition proceedings gets into concrete shape and form by publication in the official gazette of government of karnataka ..... such construction, as canvassed by the appellants, if 15 accepted would offend the language of sections 24(2) and 33(2) of the khb act. ..... a notification to that effect shall be published in the official gazette [and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language]. .....

B. Krishnabhat Vs. Bangalore Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR2865; 1988(2)KarLJ481

..... -section (1) of section 4, then, notwithstanding anything contained in this act or the karnataka municipalities act, 1964 or any other law, but subject to the provisions of section 4, with effect from the date on which such area is included in the city, the following consequences shall ensue, namely -(a) the municipal council or the sanitary board, or the notified area committee or the town board of such local area (hereinafter referred/to as the local authority) shall cease to exist;(b) the unexpended balance of the ..... any inhabitant objecting to the imposition of the said tax may within one month from the publication in the official gazette of the said notice, send his objections in writing to the corporation which shall consider the same or authorise the standing committee for taxation and finance to consider the same and report thereon and ..... the petitioners contend that notification dated 14th may, 1981 issued by the government gazetted on 21st may 1981 (annexure-a) in exercise of its power under section 29 of the bangalore development authority act 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the b. d. a. ..... 'from the plain language employed, it is evident that it confers no power on anybody but merely declares the consequences when certain areas come within the limits of the corporation. .....

The Diocese of Mysore of the Roman Catholic Church, Mysore Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR627; 1998(6)KarLJ89

..... - (a) review the actions taken by the different departments, public undertakings, all institutions and local bodies and institutions receiving grants by the state government in the implementation of official language policy of the state government; (b) suggest measures to the state government for the effective implementation of the recommendations of ..... oneof the reporters asked me the question what is the purview of thekannada development authority, i said that as far as the operation of the kannada development authority act is concerned, in alighter vein i did say that everything under the sky and above theground in karnataka fall within the karnataka developmentauthority's ambit. ..... should be allowed to be in the control of the situation unless of course, the issue gives rise to law and order situation;in such situation, it is the authority responsible to maintain the law and order situation and not the chairman of the 2nd respondent who should get involved to abate the law and order situation.8. ..... this gave rise to genuine apprehension in the mind of the petitioner to the effect that the rannada development authority, who is impleaded as 2nd respondent herein, may interfere in the religious activities of the petitioner and would cause ..... it was not my intention to say that thekannada development authority can have its jurisdiction overeach and every matter in karnataka. ..... of the authority for which the 2nd respondent has been constituted is as envisaged in section 15 of the act. .....

Devendra Kumar Tyagi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of three years from the date of the publication of the notification; or (ii) published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984, shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification: provided further that no such declaration shall be made unless the compensation to be awarded for such property is to be paid by a company, wholly or partly out of public revenues or some fund controlled or managed by a local authority. ..... likely to be needed for any public purpose or for a company, a notification to that effect shall be published in the official gazette and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language and the collector shall cause public notice of the substance of such notification to be given at convenient places in the said locality (the last of the dates of such publication and the giving of such public notice, being hereinafter referred to as the ..... petition under article 32 of the constitution of india, inter alia, challenging the notification dated 03.7.2006 issued under section 4 and the notification dated 18.12.2007 issued under section 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the la act ) for acquiring their lands for a planned development of the leather city project in order to relocate bone mills and allied industries by invoking the urgency provisions under section 17(1) and 17(4) of the ..... of karnataka & ..... of karnataka & .....

Patel Byrappa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant200; ILR2006KAR3499

..... --(i) to (v) x x x x x x(vi) the provision of land for carrying out any educational, housing, health or slum clearance scheme sponsored by government or by any authority established by government for carrying out any such scheme, or, with the prior approval of the appropriate government, by a local authority, or a society registered under the societies registration act, 1860 (21 of 1860), or under any corresponding law for the time being in force in a state, or a co-operative society within the meaning of any law relating to co-operative ..... of section 4 states that whenever it appears to the appropriate government that the land in any locality is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose or for a company, a notification to that effect shall be published in the official gazette and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language and the collector shall cause public notice of the substance of such notification to be given at convenient places in the said locality. ..... in view of the central act, the provisions of state act by which the deputy commissioner is authorised to issue notice is not applicable and that the central act 1894 will prevail over the karnataka amendment act of 1961, a division bench of this court found that there were two conflicting judgments of the division bench on this point, they are naveen jayakumar ..... with effect from 27-11-1991 does not have the effect of repealing the karnataka act no. .....

Syed Ahmed. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... gratification whatever, other than legal remuneration, as a motive or reward for doing or forbearing to do any official act or for showing or forbearing to show, in the exercise of his official functions, favour or disfavour to any person or for rendering or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether ..... such phraseologies are more in the nature of flourishes of language to emphasise the reluctance of an appellate court to interfere with acquittal than to curtail the power of the court to review the evidence and to come to its ..... we agree with the high court that in view of explanation (d) to section 7 of the act, the issue whether syed ahmed could or could not deliver results (as it were) becomes irrelevant in view of the acceptance of the testimony of nagaraja (pw1) and sidheshwara swamy ..... state of karnataka, (2007) 4 scc 415, namely:-(1) an appellate court has full power to review, reappreciate and reconsider the evidence upon which the order of acquittal ..... by the state, a learned single judge of the high court of karnataka by his order dated 25th july, 2006 set aside the judgment and order of the trial court and convicted syed ahmed for an offence punishable under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the act. .....

Shri.chetan S/o: Mahantappa Kabbur Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... section 4 contemplates that the government shall carryout 3 3 a social impact assessment study in consultation with the local authorities within a period of six months from the date of its commencement and make the same available to public. ..... assuming that the final notification had been set aside, liberty to issue a fresh final notification after complying with sections 16 to 18 r/w rules 21 to 27 was not permissible in law, since this court does not have jurisdiction or authority of law to extend the period of limitation of one year to issue the final notification, which expired on 05.06.2020 itself as held by the constitution bench of the apex court in the case of padma sundara 5 2 rao vs. ..... impact assessment, investigation, study and determination contained in chapter-ii of the said act of 2013 have clearly been inserted, keeping in mind the aims and objectives of the said act of 2013 and so long as the said mandatory requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying .....

Sri.a.a. Attar Since Died His Lrs Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... section 4 contemplates that the government shall carryout 3 3 a social impact assessment study in consultation with the local authorities within a period of six months from the date of its commencement and make the same available to public. ..... assuming that the final notification had been set aside, liberty to issue a fresh final notification after complying with sections 16 to 18 r/w rules 21 to 27 was not permissible in law, since this court does not have jurisdiction or authority of law to extend the period of limitation of one year to issue the final notification, which expired on 05.06.2020 itself as held by the constitution bench of the apex court in the case of padma sundara 5 2 rao vs. ..... impact assessment, investigation, study and determination contained in chapter-ii of the said act of 2013 have clearly been inserted, keeping in mind the aims and objectives of the said act of 2013 and so long as the said mandatory requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying .....

Smt.parvatevva H Hangi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... section 4 contemplates that the government shall carryout 3 3 a social impact assessment study in consultation with the local authorities within a period of six months from the date of its commencement and make the same available to public. ..... assuming that the final notification had been set aside, liberty to issue a fresh final notification after complying with sections 16 to 18 r/w rules 21 to 27 was not permissible in law, since this court does not have jurisdiction or authority of law to extend the period of limitation of one year to issue the final notification, which expired on 05.06.2020 itself as held by the constitution bench of the apex court in the case of padma sundara 5 2 rao vs. ..... impact assessment, investigation, study and determination contained in chapter-ii of the said act of 2013 have clearly been inserted, keeping in mind the aims and objectives of the said act of 2013 and so long as the said mandatory requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying .....

Vinayak S/o Narayana Rao Davande Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... section 4 contemplates that the government shall carryout 3 3 a social impact assessment study in consultation with the local authorities within a period of six months from the date of its commencement and make the same available to public. ..... assuming that the final notification had been set aside, liberty to issue a fresh final notification after complying with sections 16 to 18 r/w rules 21 to 27 was not permissible in law, since this court does not have jurisdiction or authority of law to extend the period of limitation of one year to issue the final notification, which expired on 05.06.2020 itself as held by the constitution bench of the apex court in the case of padma sundara 5 2 rao vs. ..... impact assessment, investigation, study and determination contained in chapter-ii of the said act of 2013 have clearly been inserted, keeping in mind the aims and objectives of the said act of 2013 and so long as the said mandatory requirements contained in chapter-ii have not been exempted by issuing / publishing a duly gazetted gazette notification in the official gazette in accordance with section 10-a of the said act of 2013 (karnataka amendment), any acquisition and a preliminary notification 3 5 issued without following or complying .....