Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka lifts act 1974 Court: delhi Page 7 of about 1,325 results (0.096 seconds)

Tribunal at Its Own Motion Vs. the Secretary Ministry of Environment a ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... against those ml holders who were found violating the provisions of water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 as well as the ml conditions and forest act and even revoking their licence if repeatedly found violating the provisions of law. ii. ..... it is reported that in the landscape nearer to the central western ghats which consists of forests in karnataka and adjacent parts of kerala and tamil nadu and also in the badhavgarh tiger reserve in madhya pradesh there is highest concentration of tigers ..... 10 scc 604 held that "all efforts must be made to implement the spirit and provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972; the provisions of which are salutary and are necessary to be implemented to maintain ecological chain and balance. ..... are conscious of the fact that under schedule-i of the national green tribunal act, 2010 wildlife (protection) act, 1972 is not listed and therefore this tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudicate ..... issue to be examined is whether these mines are sanctioned and allowed to operate in violation of provisions of the page 15 of 25 environment (protection) act, 1986 (for short 'act of 1986') and rules made thereunder. 22. ..... life (protection) act, bio-diversity act, forest conservation act etc. ..... section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986 gives powers to the central government to take all measures which if feels are necessary for protecting and improving the quality of environment and .....

Shri Brij Mohan Behl Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)125; 98(2002)DLT48; 2002(63)DRJ417

..... there could be cases requiring detailed investigation under the customs act or for purposes of criminal prosecution and in which the detaining authority could also wait and watch whether to pass detention order or not. ..... action was also taken against him under section 7 of cofeposa act till he surrendered before acmm on 29.3.2001 and the order was served on him on 30.3.2001. ..... state of karnataka and anr. ..... action under section 7 of cofeposa act was also initiated against him. ..... petitioner was detained by order dated 4.8.2000 under section 3 of cofeposa act which was executed on 30.3.2001. .....

Poly Saha Vs Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... by an order dated 14.06.2010 issued by the ministry of finance, department of revenue, central economic intelligence bureau, government of india, the central government, in exercise of power conferred under section 8(f) of the cofeposa act, confirmed the aforesaid detention order and further directed under section 10 thereof that the detenu (sanjay saha @ sona bhai) be detained for a period of one year from the date of his detention, that is, ..... dated 05.04.2010 passed against the detenu (sanjay saha @ sona bhai), who is the petitioners husband, under section 3(1)(iii) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the cofeposa act).2. ..... on proper construction of clause (5) of article 22 read with section 3(3) of the cofeposa act, it is imperative for valid continuance of detention that the detenu must be supplied with all documents, statements and other materials relied upon in the ..... government of karnataka: (2009) 11 scc 438 to submit that the non-supply of relied upon documents along with the grounds of detention within the period stipulated in section 3(3) of the cofeposa act would be fatal to the detention and the detention order would be liable to be quashed on the ground of its ..... become illegal on account of non- supply of relied upon documents within the stipulated period of five days, as indicated by the provisions of article 22(5) of the constitution of india read with section 3(3) of the cofeposa act. .....

Baldeep Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi72

..... now, thereforee, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974, the administrator of the union territory of delhi hereby directs that the said shri baldeep singh be detained and kept in custody in ..... [1972]1scr1022 , 17 days' unexplained delay in passing orders on representations made by the detenus who were detamed under section 3(l)(2) of orissa preventive detention act (1970) (as extended to manipur) was itself held to be a sufficient ground for holding that the orders of detention were illegal. ..... he confessed that he had engaged you for arranging the shipment of fork lift tyres; that 102 and 55 tyres recovered from the premises at avi/438, faiz road, karol bagh, new delhi ..... you further disclosed that 102 similar fork lift tyres were lying in a godown at xvi/438, faiz road, karol bagh, new delhi; that this place belongs to your ..... john; that the said 102 fork lift tyres are also supposed to contain drug and are meant for export ..... disclosed that the aforesaid fork lift tyres had been, given ..... the hashish was being concealed in fork lift tyres, which could not be opened except with some special apparatus, which ..... ; that the consignment of 16 fork lift tyres which was booked under air france ..... that 55 similar fork lift tyres given to you ..... -5841 dated 17-4-78 by lufthansa airlines were also sent by you and you knew that drug was concealed in the said fork lift tyres. ..... date of fork lift tyres 1 2 .....

Competent Authority and Administrator vs.navita Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

..... justice vibhu bakhru % order0307.2018 vibhu bakhru, j1 the petitioner competent authority, smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976 (hereafter referred to as the competent authority ) has filed the present petition under article 226 and 227 of the constitution of india impugning an order dated 14.07.2017 (hereafter ..... of section 3(1) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (hereafter cofeposa ). ..... authority had, thereafter, decided to lift the restrain order under section 11 of the act as is apparent from the plain language ..... and observed as under:-" from the combined reading of contents of letter dated 12.2.2004 & provision of section 11 of the said act it is clear that the restraint order issued earlier under this aforesaid provisions of section 11 by the competent authority was lifted on 12.02.2004 so far as the schedule property is concerned. ..... it means on being lifting of restraint order, the competent authority has lifted the order referred above of the transfer with respect to right, title and interest in the said property in the name of the appellant and once that is so, it is not proper on ..... section 11 of the sefem(fop) act, 1976 with respect to right, title and interest in house property situated at a-3/88, paschim vihar, new delhi is hereby lifted. ..... furnished her explanation as early as in the year 2003, which was accepted as restrain order had been lifted by a communication dated 12.02.2004. .....

Varita Soni Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... the calculation of fourteen years of incarceration is based on another postulate, articulated in swamy shraddananda, namely that a sentence of life imprisonment is first commuted (or deemed converted) to a fixed term of twenty years on the basis of the karnataka prison rules, 1974 and a similar letter issued by the government of bihar. ..... in the cross-examination, he accepted that his father had also called the police, prior to him, and the police had not seized his clothes though they had blood stains when he lifted vandana. .....

Veera SarIn and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... of whom an order of detention has been made under the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (52 of 1974): provided that (i) such order of detention, being an order to which the provisions of section 9 or section 12a of the said act do not apply, has not been revoked on the report of the advisory board under section 8 of the said act or before the receipt of the report of the advisory board or before making a reference to the advisory board; or (ii) such ..... the emergency was lifted and the proclamation rescinded on 21.03.1977; the same day, pursuant to the mandate of section 12-a, shri sarin's detention order was revoked. ..... in response, the law ministry has opined that revocation of the order of detention under section 12a of the cofeposa act because of the lifting of the emergency will not render the safema inapplicable to a person in respect of whom an order of detention had been made under section 12a of the cofeposa act. ..... after lifting of emergency and before proceeding with forfeiture proceedings on the basis of first show cause notice dated 20.04.1980 opinion was also sought from law ministry about applicability of proceedings under safema (fop) w.p. .....

Veera SarIn and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... of whom an order of detention has been made under the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (52 of 1974): provided that (i) such order of detention, being an order to which the provisions of section 9 or section 12a of the said act do not apply, has not been revoked on the report of the advisory board under section 8 of the said act or before the receipt of the report of the advisory board or before making a reference to the advisory board; or (ii) such ..... the emergency was lifted and the proclamation rescinded on 21.03.1977; the same day, pursuant to the mandate of section 12-a, shri sarin's detention order was revoked. ..... in response, the law ministry has opined that revocation of the order of detention under section 12a of the cofeposa act because of the lifting of the emergency will not render the safema inapplicable to a person in respect of whom an order of detention had been made under section 12a of the cofeposa act. ..... after lifting of emergency and before proceeding with forfeiture proceedings on the basis of first show cause notice dated 20.04.1980 opinion was also sought from law ministry about applicability of proceedings under safema (fop) w.p. .....

Hem Karan Bidhuri vs.delhi Pollution Control Committee (Dpcc)

Court : Delhi

..... ) 2 scc171 where samples were not lifted from a unit which had permission to run the unit and the acquittal under section 24 and 25 of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 was upheld.6. ..... the petitioner s conviction under sections 24 read with section 43, section 25 read with section 44, and section 33a read with section 41 of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 and the minimum sentence of one year and six months and fine imposed by trial court.2. ..... after having heard learned counsel for the parties and on scrutiny of the impugned judgment and the evidence on record, i find that non- lifting of samples of water for analysis is not fatal to the case of the respondent as it is evident from the inspection report of 21st february, 2000 that no effluent treatment plant was installed by petitioner to treat the ..... three complainant witnesses have categorically deposed that during the inspection, they found that said unit was engaged in activity of textile printing without mandatory consent under the water act and without installing an etp for treating the effluent and same was discharging the untreated effluent. ..... page 1 of 6 complainant and area sdm washing of screens used for printing was going on and the untreated trade effluent of the same was discharged in violation of section 24 of the water act and accused were doing the aforesaid acts without consent of board as contemplated under section 25 and 26 which is punishable under section 42 and 44. .....

Atikur Rahaman vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... that in para 73 of the grounds of detention, the detaining authority held as follows: while passing the detention order under the provisions of the conservation of the foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 i have referred to and relied upon the documents mentioned in the enclosed list, which are also being served to you along with the grounds of detention. 41. ..... on 22.06.2016 letter written to the superintendent of police (north goa) asking for status of execution of detention order, marked as annexure d -1 letter written by superintendent of police (north goa) to the superintendent of police uttar kannada district karwar karnataka forwarding the detention order and requesting the to detain said person, marked as annexure d-2 11 15.06.2016 departmental officer attended the court i/r of cancellation of bail of smt shehnaz filed by the department ..... been specifically averred in the writ petition that the detenue was staying at his native place at bhatkal, karnataka and came to know of the detention order only after its publication in a national newspaper on 05.08. ..... the statement recorded to the statement recorded on 09.02.2016 to avoid prolixity, which reads as under: annexure to the statement of shri ibrahim ateef damda fakki dated 09.02.2016 tendered under section 108 of the customs act, 1962 a address present house no 765/2a, df house bunder road, iind cross muscat colony, kokti nagar, kannada, karnataka 581320, (new address) bhatkal, uttara w.p. (c rl .....