Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka khadi and village industries act 1956 schedule 1 schedule Court: karnataka Page 10 of about 1,747 results (0.239 seconds)

C.K. Seetharam Vs. Jayalakshmamma and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(1998)ACC7; 1999ACJ1569

..... passengers who are not employees of the insured: in consideration of the payment of an additional premium as stated in the schedule and notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in section ii '(c)' is hereby understood and agreed that the company will indemnify the insured against his legal liability under the statute (except fatal accidents act, 1855) in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person not being an employee of the insured nor carried ..... one who is carried in a goods vehicle with the goods transported by him or by his motor vehicle, may also come within the framework of the expression 'third party' in the context of sections 145(g) and 146 of the act of 1988.no doubt in the policy with reference to third party limits, with reference to the death of or bodily injuries to any person caused, arising out of the use of motor vehicle, it is mentioned that ..... vehicle but he could travel in view of the provisions of rule 100 of the karnataka motor vehicles rules, 1989 which is analogous to rule 161 of the old rules. ..... 1 along with statement of pw 3 clearly reveals that at the time when he boarded the goods vehicle he had hired it for the transportation of two bags of rice to bangalore from his village for charges therefor as agreed and he boarded along with those two bags of rice as the owner of the goods. ..... dealing with section 17-b of industrial disputes act, their lordships observed:(11) section 17-b on its terms does not say that it would bind awards passed before .....

Sarvamma Wife of Late T.C. Nanjappa and Vs. U.R. Virupakshaiah @ Virup ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2010KAR3595

..... prior partition pleaded by the defendants the plaintiff is entitled to a half-share in the suit property as rightly held by the courts below.it is contended that a question as to whether there was a joint family and whether the suit schedule properties were joint family properties being pure questions of fact which have been concurrently decided by the courts below in favour of the plaintiff, there is no scope for interference by this court in terms of section ..... evidence that was before the court, the trial court held that the plaintiff had proved that the suit schedule properties are the ancestral and joint family properties of the plaintiff and that the defendant had unlawfully got the revenue entries made out in his name and therefore held that the plaintiff was entitled to half share in the suit properties while negating the claim of ..... death, the defendant's name was reflected in the revenue entries and since 1956, the defendant is in possession and enjoyment of the suit properties along with other properties as the ..... therefore, the admitted absence of both the plaintiff's father and the plaintiff for over eight decades from the village in which the suit properties are situated, hardly raises any presumption of ..... from service, with an intention to settle down at chikkathotlukere, requested the defendant to partition the suit properties as it was the plaintiff's belief that the properties were being mismanaged and that the defendant would act against the interest of the plaintiff. .....

Doddabasappa Basappa Belavigi Vs. Gadigeppa Veerappa Nelogal (Deceased ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR2987; 2004(2)KarLJ251

..... entitled to their legitimate 3/4th share in said 'a' schedule lands and not half share as pleaded by plaintiff and, in the circumstances ..... parties on the principles of res-judicata and estoppel and as such, the plaintiff is entitled to get 1/4th share only in suit 'a' schedule properties and 2990 indian law reports 2003 karnataka series not as claimed by him since he is not entitled under law and equity to have the suit 'a' schedule lands allotted to the share of 2nd defendant and deprive defendants 3 & 4 from their legitimate share in those properties and, at any rate, as per the said judgment and decree, defendants 3 to 5 are ..... tenant namely, 1st defendant and during that period of the year 1967, land reforms act had already been introduced on 13.9.1965 and probably, for that reason, the 2nd defendant, who is not a rustic villager but a teacher and m.sc. ..... be that as it may, the suit 'a' schedule lands were also tenanted lands in possession of the 1st defendant only from the year 1956 and thus, he was in possession of those lands as a tenant till 1.2.1967, on which date he purchased the same under registered .....

Munivenkatappa Vs. Chikkapapamma

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3014; 1991(4)KarLJ6

..... main issues for consideration before the court of munsiff was, as to whether the plea of the respondent that on the date on which the appellant claimed that he had purchased the suit schedule lands under two registered sale deeds dated 8-1-1951 (ex.d.4) and 5-6-1953 (ex.d.5) from hanumanthappa, he did not acquire any right or title to the property, for the reason that on the said datehanumanthappa did not have any title to the property, he having ..... in this second appeal presented under section 100 of the code of civil procedure referred to division bench under section 9 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, the following question of law arises for consideration: whether in a second appeal presented before this court under section 100 of the c.p.c. ..... . pichi reddi [(1956) air andhra 250] the andhra pradesh high court has held that there is nothing either in section 103 or in order xli, rule 27, civil procedure code, which excludes the applicability of the latter provision to second appeals and that the terms of rule 27 are general in application and in an appropriate case it is open to the high court in second appeal to admit additional evidence ..... 45/5 of kooteri village, kasaba hobli, kolar taluk, by registered safe deed dated 18-1-1951 (marked as ex.d.4in the suit) and that he purchased another 32 guntas of land in the same survey number under a registered sale deed dated 5-3-1953 (marked as ex.d.5 in the suit) from one hanumanthappa, the father of the respondent. o.s. no. .....

The Bangalore City Corporation Vs. Miss. Maria Jamal, Do. Md. Kamal Mu ...

Court : Karnataka

..... suit filed by one syed iqbal hussain in o.s.no.31/1994 was also contested by the corporation on identical grounds, in that, the suit properties were purchased from narayanaswamy, the father of pw.l and there lore the non-examination of the attesting witnesses to the will set up by the dlaintitf was not fatal to his case, since there were attendant documents in support of his ..... had stated that, on verification of the village records, it was found that the points furnished by the corporation engineer did not tally with the opinion found in the survey records and has acknowledged the order passed in appeal in favour ot narayanaswamy and others and has opined that it would not be open to question their status again and that in respect of the land in survey ..... a note dated 21.8.1989 sent by the then commissioner to the superintendent engineer (east), to submit his report with regard to th; dispute involved and the additional chief engineer, bangalore city corporation, had requested to send the original 29 files pending with regard to the court cases. ..... the registration of katha in respect of the suit schedule property for the breach of conditions specified under the provisions of sec.443(1) of the corporation act? ..... military station, bangalore, and the then collector in proceedingsd.dis.f.5/1946 approved the layout ol sites as town sites abutting vacant land to premises no.324 as referred to in revenue appeals 94 and 96 of 64-66 by the sub-divisional officer in his order dated 28.6.1956? .....

Mammunhi Beary Vs. Neelamma and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1976Kant21; 1975(2)KarLJ300

..... lays down for more than a presumption to the effect that encroachments made by lessees upon land adjacent to leasehold land may be treated as having, been made for the more beneficial enjoyment of the leasehold land and therefore intended to be held as part of the leasehold: but that presumption can be rebutted by a number of circumstances tending to show that the intention of the lessee was to acquire the land for his own benefit or that the ..... for securing the grant the defendant made it appear that she was the owner and occupier of the verga land of the plaint 'a' schedule and pleaded its kumki privilege as a around for preference in her favour so far as the darkhast was concerned.it was contended by the plaintiff that the 'b' schedule land was secured by the first defendant on a darkhast by pleading kumki privileges that she acquired the same by making use of her position as the occupant of the ..... the kumaki privilege will be admitted even if the land in connection with the enjoyment of which the privilege is claimed is situated in a different village. ..... act does not entitle the mortgagor to recover acquisitions made by the mortgagee for his own benefit in circumstances which do not bring him within section 90 of the trusts act, and that he would be entitled to redeem the property when the mortgagee had any special advantage by reason of his possession as mortgagee in acquiring it.after considering the said decision it was observed by b. m. ..... (air 1956 mys 14). .....

Dattaram N. Anvekar Vs. Shankar L. Parulekar

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1981Kant103

..... , my answer to the question referred for opinion is as follows:-if any area has been newly added to any municipal area specified in ii schedule to the karnataka rent control act, 1961, by virtue of a notification issued under the provisions of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, no separate notification under sub-section (5) of section 2 of the karnataka rent control act is necessary to make the provisions of parts iv and v of the karnataka rent control act applicable to the newly added area.20. ..... bench consisting of the chief justice .and justice bopanna has referred the following question for the opinion of the full bench; 'if any area has been newly added to any village, municipal area or notified area specified in schedule 11 to the karnataka rent control act. ..... order of reference, the division bench has given the citation of the decision of the supreme court as nalanda ceramic and industries ltd., v. n. s. ..... act began to apply to tiroda town with effect from 12-6-1956 on which date it was' constituted into a municipality.the contention urged for the respondent therein that a fresh notification was necessary to bring that act into force in tiroda municipality ..... as tiroda was constituted as a municipality on june 12, 1956, the supreme court held that the provisions of these chapters became applicable from ..... as tiroda was constituted as a municipality on june 12, 1956, the provisions of these chapters became applicable to it from ..... 1956 and the notification became applicable to it .....

Sundara Bai Ammal Vs. Rajagopal

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR1706

..... various clauses of the agreement consisting of 18 clauses and 4 schedules, the clauses that are very material for our purpose are these :(1) the first party shall hand over actual possession of only the business 'saravana industries' with the machinery, tools, office fittings and furniture, licences and other documents more fully described in the schedule 'a', 'b', 'c' and 'd' annexed along with the agreement and signed by both the parties, which will form the part and parcel of this agreement. ..... cross-examination he admits that the factory premises consists of an office room, two rooms for the machineries etc, that the factory building is a permanent structure with brick walls on all the three sides and stone slab on one side and the defendant cannot take the machineries outside the factory but he has to use the machinery inside the factory itself, that the defendant can also bring any other extra ..... regard the parties are entitled to adduce evidence respecting the circumstances under which the transaction evidenced under the deed had been entered into by the parties and section 92 of the evidence act would not come in the way of adducing oral evidence.in panditchunchun jha v. sheikh ebadat ali and another : [1955]1scr174 the supreme court dealing with the principles of interpretation of a document held :each case must be decided on its own ..... . so that when the hut ceased to exist in 1956, the accessory licence to occupy the site also ceased along with it .....

Medar Nagamma Vs. Medar Sanna Sivanna

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR650; 1991(3)KarLJ217

..... is stated that a purchaser of mortgaged property in execution of mortgage decree can bring a suit for possession against the holder of equity of redemption, who has purchased a part of equity of redemption from mortgagor and who had been left out in the mortgage suit and that a decree can be made in his favour subject to the defendant's right of redemption, if the mortgagee was not aware of the purchase of part of the equity of redemptfon by the defendant at the ..... rao, learned counsel for the appellants, contends that, in this appeal the appellants could canvass the other points available on record, as the concession that was made was on a question of law and when the concession made by the counsel on behalf of his client on a question of law, it would not bind his client so as to preclude him from urging the plea in a ..... defendants 1 to 8 as the landlords of the suit property is binding on the civil court and that the civil court cannot pass an injunction restraining defendants 1 to 8 from taking delivery of the plaint schedule property in execution of the order passed in h.r.c.no. ..... law has intentionally avoided the expression 'equity of redemption' and in section 60 of the transfer of property act the expression 'right to redeem' has been used. ..... law is made clear by a division bench of this court in the case of paramound industries v. c.m. ..... and that this in turn depends upon whether all the plots are situated in one and the same place or they lie in different parts of the village .....

Janaki Vs. Rama Bangera

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR973

..... , but was pending in appeal in the appellate court when the west bengal premises tenancy act, 1956, was extended to include the suit schedule property within its ambit. ..... within the limits of the cities under the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 and the areas within a radius of three kilometres from the limits of the said cities.xxx xxx xxxin terms of section 1 of the amendment act, the amendment act shall be deemed to have come into ..... a statute in the following terms :'the rule is that when a subsequent act amends an earlier one in such a way as to incorporate itself, or a part of itself, into the earlier, then the earlier act must thereafter be read and construed (except where that would lead to a repugnancy, inconsistency or absurdity) as if the altered words had been written into the earlier act with pen and ink and the old words scored out so that thereafter there is 'no need to refer ..... schedules i, ii and iii:-for schedules i, ii and iii of the principal act, the following schedules shall be substituted, namely :-schedule ..... to as the 'amendment act'), schedules i, ii and iii of the principal act were amended by section 4 of the amendment act. ..... was that peramannur being situated within 3 kilometres of the city limits of mangalore city, in terms of the amendment act, the executing court could not make an order for recovery of possession in the execution proceedings pending before it. ..... property is situated at peramannur village which is outside the city limits ..... industrial .....