Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2006(1)JCR289(Jhr)]; (2006)IILLJ346Jhar
..... that the objection now being sought to be taken on behalf of the appellant and the state of bihar regarding the status of the irrigation department as an industry' within the meaning of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, could have been taken by the appellant and the state of bihar when the dispute raised by the workmen had been referred under section 10 of the aforesaid act to the labour court for adjudication. ..... , was not based on any independent finding, but on two previous decisions of the hon'ble supreme court, which did not have any occasion to consider the question as to whether the irrigation department of the government was an industry or not, as has been done in the cases of banaglore water supply and sewerage board and bijoy kumar bharti (supra). mr. ..... the observation made by the hon'ble supreme court with regard to the status of the irrigation department of the government in the case of the executive engineer (state of karnataka) v. k. ..... the employees in the irrigation department of the government were not 'workmen' within the meaning of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and that such view had been expressed by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of executive engineer (state of karnataka) v. k. ..... in the case of executive engineer (state of karnataka) v. k. ..... decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of executive engineer (state of karnataka) v. ..... been observed by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of the executive engineer (state of karnataka) v. k. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... his palms by abusing his office as minister, and then ceased to hold the office before the court was called upon to take cognizance of the offence against him and, therefore, sanction as contemplated by section 6 would not be necessary; but if after committing the offence and before the date of taking of cognizance of the offence, he was elected as a municipal president in which capacity he was a public ..... under consideration before the hon ble supreme court as to whether sanction for prosecution is at all necessary in terms of section 19 of the prevention of corruption act when the petitioner holding post of chairman and managing director, goa shiypard hotel committed certain offences under the prevention of corruption act but retired and subsequently when the charge-sheet was submitted, he was holding the post of chairman and managing director ..... altered by a court in appeal, confirmation or revision on the ground of the absence of, or any error, omission or irregularity in, the sanction required under sub-section (1), unless in the opinion of that court, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby; (b) no court shall stay the proceedings under this act on the ground of any error, omission or irregularity in the sanction granted by the authority, unless it is satisfied that such error, omission or irregularity has ..... 1000/- per hectare in non-irrigated area through opening of the bank account in the name of farmers where more than 50% loss to ..... karnataka ..... of karnataka, ( .....
Tag this Judgment!