Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka industries facilitation act 2002 section 15 certification Sorted by: old Court: karnataka dharwad Page 1 of about 173 results (0.051 seconds)

Haribhau Siddapa Patil and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. by ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... assumed importance before all authorities. 34. it is rather ironic that a combination of the statutory provisions under the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959, karnataka industries [facilitation] act, 2002 and the karnataka industrial area development act, 1966, are all pressed into service for the purpose of acquiring a small extent of 13 acres 27 guntas ..... the single window agency which according to the learned government advocate has statutory recognition in terms of the provision of section 6 of the karnataka industries [facilitation] act, 2002. 32. it is not in dispute that the fifth respondent is a private co-operative society said to be formed by farmers ..... foundation for acquisition was laid by the clearance given by the state level single window clearance agency functioning under the provisions of the karnataka industries [facilitation] act, 2002; that the state level single window clearance committee had considered the proposal of the fifth respondent in its 27th meeting held .....

Kakaral Ravikumar, Koppa and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. b ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and such manner cannot pass scrutiny, particularly, the scrutiny of judicial review of state action not only on the touchstone of the provisions of the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 and rules, the karnataka industries [facilitation] act, 2002 and the environment [protection] act, 1986, but also the constitutional provisions and placing and placing reliance on the judgments indicated above has strongly urged for allowing the appeals, quashed ..... ; that on the clearance of the project by the state high level clearance committee before which the fourth respondent had filed an application under the provisions of the karnataka industries [facilitation] act, 2002, [for short facilitation consideration act] availing the services of udyog mithra had given due consideration to the request of the fourth respondent; that they have been put in possession of the subject lands .....

Hubli Electricity Supply Company Ltd Vs. M/s Sharavathy Conductors

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ or direction, quashing the impugned order dated1002.2016, passed by the karnataka micro and small enterprises facilitation council bangalore/arbitral authority in case no.1.2012 produced at annexure-h and etc., 2 this writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing ..... and procurement section) ... petitioner (by sri. b. s. kamate, advocate) and m/s. sharavathy conductors company private limited, reg. office no.23, bengaluru, co-operative industrial estate, 6th mile old madras road, p.b.no.1609 bengaluru-560016. ... respondent (by sri. harsh desai, advocate) this writ petition is filed under article226and227of the constitution ..... the original award and this is not permissible under law. he submits that the original award has already been challenged by him under section 34 of the act and therefore, the impugned order could not have been passed by the arbitral authority. 56. per contra, learned counsel sri. harsh desai, for respondent .....

M/s Bellary Nirmithi Kendra Vs. M/s Capital Metal Industries

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... 037/- along with interest. the said order was passed under section 18(3) of the msmed act.13. section 18 of the msmed act states as follows: 18. reference to micro and small enterprises facilitation council. (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, ..... the terms of the said agreement, the respondent filed a petition in reference petition no.69/2014 before the micro and small enterprises facilitation council4 for recovery of a sum of `34,48,445/-, consequent to which, a notice of conciliation under 1 hereinafter referred to ..... krishna aged about34years, r/o. nallacheru near valmiki bhavan ballari-583101 ...petitioner (by sri prashant f goudar, advocate) and1. m/s capital metal industries represented by its proprieter sri. chandmal p jain2830 dr. wilson street5 ground floor, v.p.road, mumbai-400004 respondent (by smt v vidya, ..... 1 r in the high court of karnataka at dharwad bench dated this the22d day of march, 2024 before the hon ble mr. justice c .....

Basamma and Others Vs. Devamma and Another

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... proceedings. 34. be that as it may, submission of learned counsel for the appellants that in the wake of the earlier judgment and decree in os no.361 of 1997 acts as res judicata in view of section 11 of cpc as against the present defendants for putting up plea of the nature that they are not owners of the subject .....

Spic Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. M/S A.K. ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of limitation; (ii) if the complainant satisfies the court that there is sufficient cause in making complaint within the said period. 21. section 3 of the limitation act reads as under: bar of limitation (1) subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive), every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and ..... no principle of interpretation of statues is more firmly settled than the rule that the court must deduce the intention of parliament from the words used in the act. applying such a rule, this court observed in s.narayanassamy vs. g. pannerselvam(4) that where the statues meaning is clear and explicit, words cannot ..... is required to be made for avoiding harassment to the hones drawers. 11. proviso to section 142 is added under amendment brought in to the negotiable instrument (amendment) act,2002. section 142 after amendment reads as follows: 142. cognizance of offences. notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure,1973 (2 of 1974), - .....

Thungabhadra Sugarcane and Banana Growers Association and Others Vs. t ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... breach of the provisions of the order. 22. by virtue of the power conferred under clause 6,7,8 and 9 of the control order the government of karnataka has passed the sugarcane regulation of distribution (hospet) order 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'hospet order' for short). clause 3 of the said order provides for ..... sugarcane according to its daily crushing capacity which should be spread over the entire crushing season of about six months. the u.p. sugarcane (regulation supply and purchase) act, 1953; v.p. sugarcane (regulation of supply and purchase) rules, 1954 and the u.p. sugarcane supply and purchase order, 1954, have been made to achieve ..... been reserved. in spite of the order when the government did not initiate any criminal proceedings, the petitioner initiated criminal prosecution under the provisions of essential commodities act. in the meanwhile five farmers of the reserved area filed w.p.no.37820/2009 for a writ of mandamus seeking direction to the deputy commissioner, bellary, .....

M/S. V.S. Lad and Sons and Others Vs. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Reported in : 2012(3)KCCR1986

..... divergence regarding the need for a specific claim in the plaint to grant the compensation. the apex court has made reference to lord cairn's (chancery amendment) act, 1858, which sought to confer jurisdiction upon equity courts to award damages in substitution or in addition to specific performance. in paragraph 16 of the said judgment, ..... (4) in determining the amount of any compensation awarded under this section, the court shall be guided by the principles specified in section 73 of the indian contract act, 1872 (9 of 1872). (5) no compensation shall be awarded under this section unless the plaintiff has claimed such compensation in his plaint: provided, that where ..... for breach of contract either in addition to the relief sought or by way of an alternative prayer. the relevant provisions contained in section 21 of the specific relief act, 1963, can be usefully referred in this connection. "21. power to award compensation in certain cases.- (1) in a suit for specific performance of a .....

Smt. Renuka and Others Vs. Smt. Siddavva and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... made by late ramappa s/o. gurappa allapura (hereinafter called the tenant) under section 48 a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (in short the act) and an application for resumption under s.15 of the act made by one late subhash, s/o. shankar gouda patil, in respect of lands bearing r.s.nos. 50/ ..... writ petitioner is unable to produce the mortgage deed. however, it was contended that, the tribunal had not conducted the proceedings as per rule 17 of the karnataka land reforms rules (for short the rules). finding that, oath had not been administrated before recording the statement of shankar gouda patil and that subhas being in ..... tenant in the statement of objections filed before the tahsildar, denied the receipt of notice under section 15 of the act from the landlord. rule 43 stipulates the mode and manner of service. section 27 of the karnataka general clauses act stipulates that, any document to be served by post, whether the expression serve or either of the expressions .....

Dr. Shivayogeppa B. Hinchigeri Vs. the Chancellor Karnataka University ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... petition raises a short, but important question regarding the appointment of a vice-chancellor of a university under the provisions of the karnataka universities act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the act, for the sake of brevity). the petitioner has assailed the notification dated 18.10.2010 issued by the first respondent-chancellor produced ..... meaning or literal interpretation should not lead to absurdity or an anonymous situation. (d) in dove investments (p) ltd., and another v/s.- gujarat industrial investment corpn. and another (2006) 2 scc 619 it has been held that whether statute would be directory or mandatory would depend upon the scheme thereof. ..... , this writ petition is maintainable. therefore, point no. 1 is answered in the affirmative. 24. point no. 2 : the karnataka state universities act, 2000 has replaced the 1976 act. chapter 3 of the said act deals with the officers of the university. section 11 mentions, inter alia, the following officers of the university i.e., (a) .....