Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka housing board act 1962 Sorted by: old Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1,121 results (0.107 seconds)

R. Thiruvengadam Vs. the Secretary to Government, Housing Department, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC323

..... the fundamental right of the petitioner shall not be ignored or brushed aside while acquiring the land for purpose of putting up houses by the tamil nadu housing board for the benefit of the affluent or resourceful urbanities, while depriving the poor villager, who is not in a position to complete. ..... , the executive engineer and administrative officer, tamil nadu housing board, sathuvachari, for their remarks, who has replied stating that the objections are common in nature, that the landowners may apply to the tamil nadu housing board for allotment of house sites under ex-landowner category and hence, recommended that the objections may be overruled. ..... there is no justification for the petitioner and his family being uprooted, thrown out and displaced and on the other hand, the housing board could very well, with slight change or least deviation proceed with its scheme.20. ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner raised the following three contentions:-(1) acquisition stands abated in terms of section 11a of the act;(2) rule 3 (b) of the rules had been violated and there is no valid and proper enquiry under section 5a of the act;(3) the objections that the petitioner and his family are residing in the property had not been considered in the manner required by law by either of the respondents and there is no reason to deny the ..... the apex court in state of karnataka and ors. v. .....

C. Ponnusamy and 62 ors. Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Commissio ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC212

..... trees and as such the lands should not be acquired as per the government order, that there has been no scheme by the tamil nadu housing board under sections 41 and 49 of the tamil nadu housing board act before acquiring lands, that the lands should have been excluded as directed by the government as has been held by the division bench of this court in ..... plots, put up construction and they reside in the plots, for the purpose of the housing board to build houses and to allot the same to third parties, that the petitioners have no other plot or land, that most of the petitioners are residing there for more than 15 years by putting ..... the remarks of the requisitioning body have not been communicated to them and rule 3 (b) of the tamil nadu land acquisition rules has been violated in that after communicating the remarks of the housing board, no personal hearing or enquiry has been conducted by the second respondent- land acquisition officer, that there is no reason or rhyme to acquire the lands which the petitioners have purchased in small ..... them have already put up construction and are residing there, with their families, that ignoring their rights, notification has been issued at the instance of the tamil nadu housing board to acquire the lands for the anna nagar neighbourhood scheme, coimbatore, that they have sent their objections, that several of them have not been served with the ..... karnataka .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pandian Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)147CTR(Mad)5; [1998]233ITR497(Mad)

..... the kerala high court held that the profit realised from the sale of the export house premium and from the sale of the import premium cannot be said to be derived from the business activities with reference to industrial ..... interest income is derived from the deposit and is not derived from the industrial undertaking and, therefore, the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction on interest on the deposit held in tamil nadu electricity board as the interest cannot be characterised as profits and gains from the industrial undertaking set up in backward areas. mr. c. v. ..... the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in holding that the interest on deposit with the tamil nadu electricity board should be treated as income derived from an industrial undertaking for the purpose of relief under section 80hh ?' 2. ..... assessee has necessarily to make the deposit with the electricity board for running the industry and the power supply will not be made without the deposit in favour of the electricity board, the income derived from the deposit with the electricity board cannot be said to have been derived from the industrial ..... [1991]190itr275(kar) , wherein the karnataka high court has held that the profit on sale of import entitlements is the profits and gains of business or profession by virtue of retrospective amendment of law made in section 28(iiia) of the act and, therefore, the assessee was entitled to the relief in respect of receipt under section 80hh of the act. .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mathurantakam Co-operative Sugar Mills ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2000]241ITR817(Mad)

..... 37 of the act are not only in respect of residential accommodation provided but also any accommodation in the nature of a 'guest house' because the meaning of the word 'guest house' as given in the concise oxford dictionary is 'superior boarding house' which necessarily includes providing of food and other facilities required for ..... 37(3) of the act which employed the same expression and the karnataka high court held as under : 'in our opinion, the use of the words 'any residential accommodation including any accommodation in the nature of a guest house' on the other hand clearly indicates that the allowance permitted under sub-s. ..... the punjab & haryana high court, following the decision of the karnataka high court cited above, held that it would be quite logical and reasonable to hold that the expression 'maintenance of a guest house' would comprehend not only the maintenance expenditure but also other expenditure incurred towards food and other ..... we are in complete agreement with the views expressed by the karnataka high court, punjab & haryana high court and calcutta high court in the ..... 121 itr 154 : tc 17r.1461, wherein the karnataka high court held that the said expression would include expenditure incurred not only in the residential accommodation but also expenditure incurred on the food and other amenities provided in the guest house. ..... the above decision of the karnataka high court was followed by the punjab & haryana high court in the case of saraswati industrial syndicate .....

C. Srinivasa Rao and Etc. Vs. P. Ramankutty and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1999Mad317

..... this decision of the karnataka high court would prove that signing the final bill or receiving the amount shown in the final bill is independent of the claim for compensation made by the contractor at a later stage and the housing board by making that payment had only discharged the contractual ..... however, if the court has to act, as argued on the side of the tamil nadu housing board, it will amount to reappraisal of evidence substituting the court's view which is forbidden. ..... after hearing the arguments advanced on the side of the tamil nadu housing board the learned counsel for the contractor has contended that this court cannot act like an appellate court and the award has to be viewed as held by the supreme court in various ..... learned arbitrator has filed six different original petitions under section 14(2) of the arbitration act, 1940, for receiving the awards and to pass a decree in terms of the said ..... ' from this decision it is clear that the court cannot act like an appellate court and it is within the competency of the arbitrator to decide the liability to pay a particular amount or damage, and the court cannot interfere with such decisions taken by the ..... of the supreme court have reiterated the said principle in almost every decision and whenever the court acted like an appellate court while considering the award, their lordships held that such evaluation of evidence is not within the jurisdiction of the court and the court should act within the settled principles of law. .....

Spencer and Co. Ltd. Vs. P.O., I Additional Labour Court and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ1005Mad

..... hand; that on account of non-compliance of the relevant provisions of law and without substantiating properly the loss occasioned to the management and without proper compliance of the notice contemplated by law having closed their 'house furnishing unit', the act of the management in announcing such closure would only amount to unfair trade practice and hence, the closure of the unit thereby rendering the workmen jobless is nothing but illegal and void.26. ..... is the spencer and company limited which is the party in all the above three proceedings is undoubtedly the management for the workmen of the third writ petitioner union and not one of its units, the 'house furnishing unit' which had been closed on september 1, 1984, that in the spencer and company there has been more than 100 workers and as such, an industrial dispute could be maintained by any of its employees or ..... further findings of the learned judge are that the first respondent/management is not manufacturing the furniture, that the retrenchment of these workmen are not justified and that under misconception that since the 'house furnishing unit' has been closed, there is no possibility of reinstatement of these workers, the learned judge has given a finding that the workers will not be entitled to reinstatement, but entitled to the benefits in ..... juncture, the learned counsel would cite a judgment in this regard karnataka electricity board v. ..... supply & drainage board : (1996)illj823mad wherein it is held as follows .....

The Income Tax Officer, T.D.S. - Vs. Raj Television Network Ltd.,

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

..... profession',- (i) any interest (not being interest on a loan issued for public subscription before the 1st day of april, 1938), royalty, fees for technical services or other sum chargeable under this act, which is payable outside india, on which tax has not been paid or deducted under chapter xvii-b: provided that where in respect of any such sum, tax has been paid or deducted under ..... further, the definition of the term 'royalty' taken from various dictionaries are also incorporated hereunder:- = as per random house dictionary and webster's new world dictionary, "royalty" was defined, inter alia as (a) payment by lessee to the owner of the land for privilege of working mine; (b) the amount paid to a ..... since both the parties relied upon the judgment of the karnataka high court reported in 2002 itr 508 (supra), it would e necessary to mention the ratio of this case ..... relied upon the decision of the karnataka high court reported in 202 itr ..... by the judgments of the hon'ble karnataka high court reported in 202 itr 508 ..... the decision of the karnataka high court in the ..... by the central board of direct taxes as per circular no.333 dated april 2, 1982, which reads thus: "it has come to the notice of the board that sometimes effect to the provisions of double taxation avoidance agreement is not given by the assessing officers when they find that the provisions of the agreement are not in conformity with the provisions of the income-tax act, 1961. 2 ..... 582); decision of the karnataka high court in the .....

Micromeritics Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Vs. S. Munusamy

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas465(Mad); (2002)3MLJ83

..... any member of the company is making complaint that the affairs of the company are being conducted in the manner prejudicial to the public interest or in the manner oppressive to any member or members and the company law board has the power, when it is satisfied that the affairs of the company are being conducted in the manner oppressive to any member or members of the company, to pass such an order as it deems fit. ..... the resolutions dated 20.3.1997 and 24.2.1997 are concerned, the appellants have not referred to the resolutions dated 20.3.1997 and 24.2.1997 in the counter affidavit and in the counter filed before the company law board they referred to the resolution dated 14.4.1997 and since no reliance was placed on the resolutions dated 20.3.1997 and 24.2.1997, the question of challenging the same did not arise. ..... learned counsel submitted that the second appellant has used the dubious method to exclude the respondents from the company to put them in financial loss and various acts of the second appellant clearly show that the second appellant have indulged in the act of oppression and mismanagement of the company and the company law board has rightly come to the conclusion that the petition is liable to be ordered and it has done so. 10. ..... learned senior counsel referred to the decision of the karnataka high court in devaraj dhanram v. ..... yet another decision relied upon by the learned senior counsel is the decision of the house of lords in scottish co-operative, ltd. v. ..... (1962) s.c.r .....

V. Devaraj, Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Govt. Hou ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(4)CTC134

..... the fundamental right of the petitioner shall not be ignored or brushed aside while acquiring the land for purpose of putting up houses by the tamil nadu housing board for the benefit of the affluent or resourceful urbanities, while depriving the poor villager, who is not in a position to complete. ..... 6 of the act, the said purpose was given up, but it is stated that the lands are sought to be acquired for formation of kalapatti neighbourhood scheme by the tamil nadu housing board which means the housing board is going to sell the developed sites without constructing the houses by themselves. ..... (iv) the purpose for which the impugned acquisition proceedings are made is to construct houses by the tamil nadu housing board and the land had already been utilised for the same purpose. ..... there is no justification for the petitioner and his family being uprooted, thrown out and displaced and on the other hand, the housing board could very well, with slight change or least deviation proceed with its scheme.20. ..... 4(1) of the act it is stated that the lands are sought to be acquired for the purpose of constructing houses by the tamil nadu housing board, in the declaration made under sec. ..... 4(1) of the act, it is stated that the lands are sought to be acquired 'for the purpose of constructing houses by the tamil nadu housing board'. ..... following the decision of the apex court in state of karnataka and others v. .....

G. Ganesan, Vs. the Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Ho ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ304

..... a result, by the impugned proceedings dated 9.6.2003, the second respondent passed the following order : 'the board resolved the following after detailed discussion : considering that there are no construction activity at present in tamilnadu housing board and taking into consideration the reduction of staff, the request of the petitioners was examined in depth on the ..... only remaining contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that since the petitioners were working under the board since 1989, they are entitled to be regularized in the services of the board on humanitarian consideration; otherwise, their right under articles 19 and 21 of the constitution of india would be ..... state of karnataka & others jt 2002 ii sc 88 confirmed the view of the learned single judge and that of the division bench, restraining the state from terminating the services of the temporary employees till regular ..... state of karnataka & others jt 2002 ii sc 88 wherein the apex court held that the persons appointed temporarily are not entitled to ..... counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are entitled for the benefits of the provisions of tamilnadu industrial establishments (conferment of permanent status to workmen) act, 1981, it is not in dispute that the respondent board is not notified as an establishment for the benefit of the provisions of the said act. ..... the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the said act is rejected. 6. .....