Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka housing board act 1962 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 394 results (0.187 seconds)

Apr 12 2013 (HC)

Land Acquisition Collector Punjab (Pwd) (Bandr) Jalandhar, and Vs. Sun ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... reliance on auction notices in a developed colony area after full development shall not be taken, as laid down by the supreme court in raj kumar versus state of haryana-(2007) 7 scc 609.followed in executive engineer, karnataka housing board versus land acquisition officer-(2011) 2 scc 246.the court has also observed that even amidst fierce competition, possibility of rigging could never be ruled out in auction notices and, therefore, the appropriate guidance ..... ...appellants versus sunil kumar son of shri ram sarup son of shri sant ram, resident of house no.49-a, aggar nagar, ludhiana. ..... if the landowner himself has brought only the auction notice subsequent to the notification, it could have been hardly an appropriate exemplar for the court to act upon. ..... this enhancement will secure the benefit of sections 23(2) and 28 and not the benefit of additional compensation under section 23(1-a) of the land acquisition act.8. ..... a loss for relocating to yet another place is surely one of the components of compensation laid down under section 23 of the land acquisition act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2008 (HC)

Smt. Mirdula Joshi Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)153PLR308

..... after noticing the correspondence between the urban development and housing department of rajasthan government and rajasthan housing board, their lordships proceeded to answer the question in para 26 of the ..... the letter is, asking the housing board as to what development work they had carried out on the land and how much expenditure they had incurred thereon, which could not have been done unless the board was in possession of the ..... the housing board was asked to send the full particulars of the expenditure and not to carry on any ..... , it cannot but be said that the possession of the land was taken by the government and was also delivered to the housing board. ..... recites that 'before restoring the possession to the society the amount of development charges will have to be returned back....this shows clearly that possession was taken over by the housing board. ..... considered the aforementioned question in the case of rajasthan housing board v. ..... was taken and handed over to the huda on the day of award under section 16 of the act except the land for which orders of stay, status quo and dispossession have been passed by any court ..... the development and utilization of land for residential, commercial, institutional and recreational purposes in sector 1, 2, 3, 5b, 5c and 6 panchkula extension (mansa devi complex) under the haryana urban development authority act, 1977 by the haryana urban development authority, in the area falling in the revenue estates of village saketri (hadbast no. ..... karnataka .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2008 (HC)

Smt. Asha Malik and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)153PLR320

..... after noticing the correspondence between the urban development and housing department of rajsthan government and rajasthan housing board, their lordships' proceeded to answer the question in para 26 of the judgment, ..... has been considered by hon'ble the supreme court in the case of rajasthan housing board (supra), mandir shree sita ramji (supra) and p.k. ..... tenor of the letter is, asking the housing board as to what development work they had carried out on the land and how much expenditure they had incurred thereon, which could not have been done unless the board was in possession of the land. ..... the housing board was asked to send the full particulars of the expenditure and not to carry on any further development ..... a whole, it cannot but be said that the possession of the land was taken by the government and was also delivered to the housing board. ..... possession was taken over by the housing board. ..... court has considered the aforementioned question in the case of rajasthan housing board v. ..... 9.5.2008 the question as to whether the acquired land could be de-notified after the award and proceedings for taking possession under section 16 of the act, also came up for consideration before a division bench of this court of which one of use (m.m. ..... the division bench after referring to the provisions of section 48 of the act discussed a catena of judgments in detail and came to the conclusion that once the possession has been taken there is no possibility of the respondent state to ..... of karnataka (2005 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2009 (HC)

Amita Banta and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2010)157PLR413

..... was as under:the irresistible inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the poser conferred under the land acquisition act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not for a bona fide housing scheme but is substantially for the purpose of enabling the concerned office bearers of respondent- societies and their agents to indulge in sale of sites in the ..... areas affected by natural calamities, or to persons displaced or affected by reason of the implementation of any scheme undertaken by government, any local authority or a corporation owned or controlled by the state;(vi) the provision of land for carrying out any educational housing, health or slum clearance scheme sponsored by government or by any authority established by government for carrying out any such scheme, or with the prior approval of the appropriate government, by a local authority, or a society registered under the societies ..... the present case, if only the proposal would have been placed before the board of cidco in all probability it would have been discarded. ..... house building cooperative society : (1995) 3 scc 128 in which the present appellant was one of the societies, which challenging the order of the division bench of the high court of karnataka, their lordships dismissed the special leave petition following the judgment in ..... the state of madras : (1962) 2 scr 169 : air 1961 sc 1731 (constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1996 (HC)

Punjab Anand Lamp Employees Union Vs. Punjab Anand Lamp Industry Ltd. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ338P& H

..... shall, unless it considers that the notice has been frivolously or vexatiously given or that it would be inexpedient so to do, make a reference under this sub-section notwithstanding that any other proceedings under this act in respect of the dispute may have commenced;provided also that where the dispute in relation to which the central government is the appropriate government, it shall be competent for that government to refer the dispute ..... view that in cases where misconduct is alleged and the workman is discharged or dismissed from service, the state government has no option but to refer the industrial dispute raised by the workman under section 10(1) of the act so as to enable him not only to challenge the validity of the enquiry but also to prove before a judicial tribunal that he is not guilty of any misconduct and even if the charge is proved the ..... , the house of lords held that the declaration granted by the trial judge was correct as the order of dismissal was a nullity because the local board could not ..... case, we may refer to the decision of a learned single judge of the karnataka high court in mypower mazdoor welfare union v. ..... judgment of learned single judge of karnataka high court in my-power mazdoor welfare ..... a learned single judge of the karnataka high court, who dealt with the issue in a writ petition filed by the union, held as under:-'the law envisages that the government should apply its mind to the ..... the judgment of the karnataka high court in d. ..... karnataka and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2014 (HC)

Dalbir Singh and Another Vs. V.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... by aggrieved persons with the complaints that appointment to class iii and class iv posts have been made without issuing any advertisement or sending requisition to the employment exchange as per the requirement of the 1959 act and those who have links with the party in power or political leaders or who could pull strings in the power corridors get the cake of employment. ..... though no merit list as such prepared of the candidates who appeared in the written test, was produced before the court by the board stating that as the criteria was cut-off marks, but it is evident from list of candidates who had appeared in the written test as produced in cwp no.8923 of ..... in cwp no.4899 of 2013, challenge has been made to the order dated 11.10.2012 passed by the secretary of the board in pursuance to a direction issued by this court for redressal of the grievance of the petitioners herein as they claim that the candidates, who were lower in merit, have been ..... air sc1395 the supreme court has upheld the quashing of the notifications under sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894 on the ground that there was no useful scheme approved by the state government prior to the issue of ..... society's prayer for invoking the doctrine of prospective overruling in favour of those members of the society who had already constructed the houses may not suffer incalculable harm was declined. ..... state of karnataka and others 2012 (3) r. ..... state of karnataka and others 2003(4) sct251 2003(7) scc517 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2009 (HC)

Chetna Estate Pvt. Limited and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)155PLR745

..... as under:the irresistible inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the poser conferred under the land acquisition act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not for a bona fide housing scheme but is substantially for the purpose of enabling the concerned office bearers of respondent-societies and their agents to indulge in sale ..... natural calamities, or to persons displaced or affected by reason of the implementation of any scheme undertaken by government, any local authority or a corporation owned or controlled by the state;(vi) the provision of land for carrying out any educational housing, health or slum clearance scheme sponsored by government or by any authority established by government for carrying out any such scheme, or with the prior approval of the appropriate government, by a local authority, or a society registered under ..... was one of the societies, which challenged the order of the division bench of the high court of karnataka, their lordships dismissed the special leave petition following the judgment in h.m.t. ..... only the proposal would have been placed before the board of cidco in all probability it would have been discarded ..... there was none - had warranted a policy decision for bulk sale the decision should have been of the board and accompanied by reasons. ..... hold a trust for public good and therefore his actions should all be above board....31. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1981 (HC)

Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1982]136ITR361(P& H)

..... words 'any residential accommodation including any accommodation in the nature of a guest house' on the other hand clearly indicates that the allowances permitted under sub-section (3) of section 37 of the act are not only in respect of residential accommodation provided but also any accommodation in the nature of a 'guest-house' because the meaning of the word 'guest-house' as given in the concise oxford dictionary is 'superior boarding house' which necessarily includes providing of food and other facilities required for ..... the contention urged for the revenue is correct, the use of the words 'any accommodation in the nature of a guest house' in sub-section (3) of section 37 of the act would be redundant, because the words 'residential accommodation' take in any residential accommodation provided even in a guest-house and separate mentioning of the words 'any accommodation' in the nature of a 'guesthouse' would have been unnecessary. ..... in aruna sugars' case, it has been held that the meaning of the term 'guest house' as a place for reception of strangers has been accepted by the rule-making authority as the rules envisage employees staying in the ..... the reasoning and the conclusions arrived at by the karnataka high court in the above said case seem to be quite logical and the learned counsel for the revenue has not been able to persuade us to take a different view ..... cit : [1980]121itr154(kar) , the karnataka high court has also taken the following view (p ..... in karnataka exports ltd. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1981 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of Jullundur City Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1981P& H287

..... its re-assembly and the central government shall seek the approval of parliament to the notification by a resolution moved within a period of fifteen days beginning with the day on which the notification if so laid before the house of the people and if the parliament makes any modification in the notification or directs that the notification should cease to have effect the notification shall thereafter have effect, only in such modified form or be of no ..... of the act, of 1974, the central government constituted a central board under section 3 of the act of 1974, for the performance of the functions enumerated in section 16 of the act of 1974, while the state board was constituted by the state government under section 4 of the act of 1974, for performing the functions enumerated in section 1 of the act of 1974 ..... the learned counsel for the parties at a great length, i am of the considered opinion that the parliament validly enacted the act of 1977, as it was within its legislative competence under article 248 read with entry 97 of list-i of the seventh ..... list ii or list iii of the seventh schedule reference in this behalf may also be made to harbhajan singh dhillon's case (air 1972 sc 1061)(supra) wherein it has been held that if a central act is challenged as being beyond the legislative competence of parliament, it is enough to enquire if it is a law with respect to matters or taxes enumerated in list ii. ..... 1958 sc 468)(supra) and state of karnataka v. ..... of mysore, air 1962 sc 594 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2014 (HC)

Rajwinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... recently in bangalore city cooperative housing society ltd.v.state of karnataka and others 2012(3) r. ..... : 2012 air sc1395 the supreme court has upheld the quashing of the notifications under sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894 on the ground that there was no useful scheme approved by the state government prior to the issue of notifications. ..... to the supreme court, it was a rule of all judicial craftsmanship with pragmatism and judicial statesmanship as a useful outline to bring about smooth transition of the operation of law without unduly effecting the rights of people who acted upon the law adopted prior to the date of judgment overruling the previous law. ..... society's prayer for invoking the doctrine of prospective overruling in favour of those members of the society who had already constructed the houses may not suffer incalculable harm was declined. ..... judge and administrator in legal ordering, observes as under: if, then, a main impulse underlying the stare decisis doctrine is that justice should respect reasonable reliance of affected parties based on the law as it seemed when they acted, this impulse still has force when reliance is frustrated by an overruling. ..... state of u.p.1997(2) sct381 m/s raymond ltd.v.m.p.electricity board, 2001(1) rcr (civil) 330, somaiya organics (india) ltd.and another ..... agent had charged huge money from the society for getting the notifications issued under sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the 1894 act and sanction of lay out plan by the bda. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //