Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka homoeopathic practitioners act 1961 chapter v course of studies qualifying examinations and recognition of institutions Page 1 of about 2 results (0.033 seconds)

Dr. Basavaraj Yellappa Kalgudi Vs. the Karnataka Ayurvedic and Unani P ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2004Kant390; ILR2004KAR3140

..... person to practice in homeopathic system of medicine if he is not qualified in accordance with the karnataka homoeopathic practitioners' act, 1961.15. there is no dispute that the petitioner does not possess requisite qualification to practice as per karnataka homeopathic practitioners' act, 1961. chapters-i and ii of the act are confined to three systems of medicine. whereas, chapter-iii provides for penal provisions applicable not only ..... .7. admittedly, the petitioner does not possess requisite qualification for practicing homeopathic system of medicine. the karnataka homeopathic practitioners' act, 1961, has come into force w.e.f. 31.3.1961. section 2(g) of the said act defines the 'practitioner' as follows:' 'practitioner' means a person who practices the homoeopathic system of medicine, as his principal occupation.'section 2(j) defines 'qualifying examination' as follows;' 'qualifying .....

Delhi Medical Association Vs. Principal Secretary (Health) and Others

Court : Delhi

..... to the mci act; or (ii) registered or eligible for registration in a medical register of a state meant for the registration of persons practising the modern scientific system of medicine excluding the homoeopathic system of medicine; or (iii) registered in a medical register other than a register for registration of homoeopathic practitioners of a state, ..... . o.p. (m.d.) no. 11994/2010 titled dr. s. arockia vargheese v. sub inspector of policequashed the proceedings/fir against the practitioners of indian system of medicine; (x) that the high court of karnataka also on 23rd march, 2000 in crl. p. no. 408/2000 titled dr. sudarshan aithal pk v. state of ..... of integrated courses is registered thereunder. 32. in view of the categorical provisions of the dmc act, need to deal with the judgments/orders of the high courts of madras and karnataka quashing the proceedings/fir registered against practitioners of indian medicine in those states, cited by counsel for dbcp, is not felt. 33. similarly .....