Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka electricity reform act 1999 section 38 restriction on disclosure of information Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 25 results (0.225 seconds)

Nov 22 2022 (SC)

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Jsw Energy Limite ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... existed a binding contract between the appellant and the kptcl on the tariff prior to commencement of karnataka electricity reform act, 1999 with effect from 01.06.1999, in terms of explanation to section 19 and proviso to section 27(2) of the act?. ..... is in the positive, whether the commission has jurisdiction to review the tariff particularly when the proviso to sub- section (2) of section 27 is restricted to tariff determination and does not require a ppa to establish a concluded contract?. ..... section 27(7) further 77 provided that within 90 days of the receipt of all the information by the licensee that the commission is to notify either its acceptance or its refusal of the licensee s revenue calculation ..... to the commission, full details of its calculations for the ensuing financial year, of the expected aggregate charges, which it believes to have been permitted to recover, pursuant to the terms of its licence and such further information, as the commission may reasonably require, to access such calculation [see section 27(7)].. ..... government order no.de120eee99bangalore dated 7th july 1999 we are happy to inform you that both the units (2 x 130 mw) of our power plant ..... on 31.03.1999 after referring to the proposal dated 21.11.1998 and a series of discussions and the further meeting with the keb officials on 26.03.1999, the first respondent indicated that in the meeting, keb officials informed that it was willing to buy power from the first respondent subject to the following terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (SC)

Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd. Vs. A.P.Elect.Regul.Commission and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the karnataka electricity reform act, 1999 (karnataka act no.25 of 1999).6. ..... the rajasthan electricity reform act, 1999 (rajasthan act no.23 of 1999).7. ..... the uttar pradesh electricity reform act, 1999 (uttar pradesh act no.24 of 1999).5. ..... is legally valid and permissible for grant of concession in the basic rates will equally hold good for the purpose of subsequent scheme of distribution of burden in the form of fuel surcharge and the decision of the board restricting levy of fuel surcharge to those categories of consumers who were enjoying the benefits of concession in the general rate and in sparing smaller type of consumers such as agriculture, irrigation and commercial consumers being subjected to that burden ..... if the commission considers that the proposed tariff or amended tariff of a licensee does not satisfy any of the provisions of sub-section (7), it shall, within 60 days of receipt of all the information which it required, and after consultation with the commission advisory committee and the licensee, notify the licensee that the proposed tariff or amended tariff is unacceptable to the commission and it shall provide to the licensee an ..... in our opinion, the board was perfectly within its rights in deciding to restrict the levy of fuel surcharge to those categories of consumers who were enjoying the benefit of a concession in the general rate and in sparing smaller type of consumers such as the agricultural, irrigation and commercial consumers from being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2011 (SC)

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... whether section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, as amended by the karnataka land reforms amendment act, 1973, (act 1 of 1974), which came into effect from 01.03.1974, read with section 79 b of the said act, introduced by amending act 1 of 1974, violates the basic structure of the constitution, in so far as it confers power on the executive government, a delegatee of the legislature, of withdrawal of exemption of linaloe plantation, without hearing and without reasons? 2. ..... we, therefore, repel the challenge on the validity of section 110 of the karnataka land reforms act as well as the notification dt.8.3.1994 and we hold that the land used for linaloe cultivation would be governed by the provisions of the land reforms act which is protected under article 31b of the constitution having been included in the ixth schedule. ..... . further, it was also noticed that the fundamental rights are not absolute but subject to law of reasonable restrictions in the interest of the general public to achieve the above objectives specially to eliminate zamindari system. 93 ..... however, the ordinance was returned by the government of india informing that it had no objection to introduce legislation as a bill and hence the same with requisite amendments was placed before the legislative assembly and the legislative council. ..... (2002) 2 scc 7; west bengal electricity regulatory commission v. ..... (2004) 10 scc 796; bihar state electricity board v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1999 (SC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Arun Kumar Agarwal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC411; JT1999(9)SC618; 1999(7)SCALE441; (2000)1SCC210; [1999]Supp5SCR278

..... including heat rate, capital cost, revenue expenses, fuel procurement and financial capability of the sponsor were considered at the time of examining the proposals of the scheme under section 29 of the electricity supply act and detailed project report which had been submitted to the central electricity authority for approval and for techno-economic clearance and detailed project report gives breakdown of the various project costs including sponsors development expenses. ..... it was also prayed to 'set aside the power project entered by karnataka electricity board (keb) with mangalore power corporation (mpc) and real lot the power project through ..... that review meeting the additional chief secretary, finance commissioner, secretary to the ministry of energy, energy secretary and chairman, karnataka electricity board had attended and those deliberations were held on january 18, 1993, january 27, 1993, february 2, 1993 and february ..... understanding with cogentrix provides for period of exclusivity, transference of existing permits and information, ability to induct partners and confidentiality. ..... the reference of the high court to the liberalisation policy, reforms approved by amendment of electricity supply act to enable induction of private sector to participate in power generation, to provide for level playing field for domestic and foreign companies in terms of the government of india is a matter of policy and, therefore, the idea of foreign ..... held from january 23, 1993 to march 3, 1999. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2019 (SC)

Sri Ganapathi Dev Temple Trust Vs. Balakrishna Bhat (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 1(a) to (e) therefore claimed to be the deemed tenants of the suit property under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 ( 1961 act ).3. ..... respondent no 1(b), vitthaldas bhat, filed a form 7 application under section 48a in 1979 for grant of occupancy rights in respect of the suit property in his favour, form 7 being the format for such 4 application as prescribed under rule 19 of the karnataka land reform rules, 1974 ( 1974 rules ). ..... they had constructed a house on 7 the suit property and had been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same and that the entry made in their favour in the record of rights shall be presumed to be true under section 133 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 ( 1964 ..... 2 further that the deceased balakrishna bhat, after obtaining necessary permission from the panchayat, constructed a house in the suit property in 1994 and obtained an electricity connection for the said house; and that after his demise, respondent nos. ..... such alleged unauthorized occupants have no right to seek an entry in the record of rights under sections 128 and 129 of the 1964 act, and any entry which is unlawfully made in their favour is liable to be deleted. ..... however, the respondents have not produced on record any report made by them as required under section 128 of the 1964 act proving that they had acquired any right or title in respect of the suit property. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2021 (SC)

K.n.nagarajappa Vs. H.narasimha Reddy

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... is a matter of record that the appellants had applied for and were granted occupancy rights under the karnataka land reforms act. ..... these appeals by special leave, a common judgment - in two second appeals1 rendered by the karnataka high court- reversing the decree of the first appellate court, has been challenged.2. ..... undoubtedly, the jurisdiction which a high court derives under section 100 is based upon its framing of a substantial question of ..... punjab state electricity board2 , this court held as follows: ..... second, when an issue of fact has been wrongly determined by the court(s) below by virtue of the decision on the question of law under section 100 of the code of civil procedure.18. ..... thus, it is evident that section 103 cpc is not an exception to section 100 cpc nor is it meant to supplant it, rather it is to serve the same ..... singh [(1992) 1 scc647; karnataka board of wakf v. ..... high court was of the opinion that in the course of a trial, the court could examine a document under section 73 of the evidence act. ..... even while pressing section 103 cpc in service, the high court has to record a finding that it had to exercise such power, because it found that finding (s) of fact recorded by the court (s) below stood vitiated because of ..... the karnataka high court framed the following question of law for consideration: whether the lower appellate court was justified in granting the decree in favor of the respondent on the basis of ..... anjuman-e-ismail madris-un-niswan [(1999) 6 scc343 and dinesh kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2017 (SC)

Energy Watchdog Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... haryana, andhra pradesh, karnataka, rajasthan and uttar pradesh have passed their reform acts and unbundled their state electricity boards into separate ..... prices instead of the price that was prevalent for the last 40 years.this being the case, in both the cases, adani power filed a petition before the central electricity regulatory commission being petition no.155 of 2012 on 5th july, 2012 under section 79 of the electricity act seeking relief on the score of the impact of the indonesian regulation to either discharge them from the performance of the ppa on account of frustration, or to evolve a mechanism ..... so far notified/created state electricity regulatory commissions either under the central act or under their own reform acts.2. ..... interpretation or (iii) change in any consents, approvals or licenses available or obtained for the project, otherwise than for default of the seller, which results in any change in any cost of or revenue from the business of selling electricity by the seller to the procurers under the terms of this agreement, or (iv) any change in the (a) declared value of land for the project or (b) the cost of implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation package of the land for ..... that the non-obstante clause advisedly restricts itself to section 62, we see no good reason to put section 79 out of the way altogether. ..... the factor of materiality or other provisions contained in this agreement, the obligation to inform the procurers contained herein shall be material. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2010 (SC)

Mrs. Zakiya Begum and ors. Vs. Mrs. Shanaz Ali and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... eviction proceeding, the respondents filed an ia being, ia 8 of 2006, wherein it was contended by the respondents that during the pendency of the eviction proceeding, under section 21(h)(f) of the 1961 act, karnataka rent act 1999 (herein after, "1999 rent act") has come into effect repealing the 1961 act and it was further contended that the eviction proceeding will have to be dealt with under the provisions of the 1999 rent act. ..... dated 18.01.2007 the court of xvth additional small causes judge, inter alia, held that "since the monthly rent of scheduled premises exceeds rs.3500/-, hence the karnataka rent act, 1999 is not applicable and this court has no jurisdiction to try the case and the petition is not maintainable before this court". ..... the application of the act is restricted to,-(i) to any residential building the standard rent of which does not exceed rupees 3,500 per month in the areas covered by karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976 and rupees 2,000 per month in other areas and a commercial building having plinth area of not exceeding ..... (2) for the purpose of this section,-(a) cost of construction shall include cost of electrical fittings, water pumps, overhead tanks, storage tank and other water, sewerage and other fixtures and fittings affixed in the premises;(b) in case any fixture and fittings referred to in clause (a) are in common ..... enacting this law, recommendations of economic administration reforms commission and the national commission on urbanisation were .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2023 (SC)

Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... different state services, such the delhi fire services under the delhi fire service act 2007, delhi commission for safai karamcharis act, 2006, delhi minorities commission act, 1999, delhi finance commission act, 1994, delhi lokayukta and upalokayukta act, 1995, delhi commission for women act, 1994, and delhi electricity reform act, 2001. ..... while parliament can make law for the whole or any part of the territory of india, the state legislature can only make laws for the state or any part thereof, subject to the restrictions in the constitution of india while parliament has exclusive power under article 246(1) of the constitution to make laws with respect to the matters enumerated in the union list, the state legislature has ..... context otherwise requires , there may be a need to depart from the normal rule if there is something in the context in which such expression occurs to show that the definition should not be applied.43 section 3(58) of the general clauses act, by virtue of article 367(1) of the constitution, applies to the construction of the expression state in the constitution, unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context of a particular provision of the constitution. ..... of this court held that the reports of a committee which preceded the enactment of a legislation, reports of joint parliamentary committees, a report of a commission set up for collecting information leading to the enactment are permissible external aids to construction. ..... state of karnataka, ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1999 (SC)

Mohan Balaku Patil and ors. Vs. Krishnoji Bhaurao Hundre (Dead) by Lrs ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC1114; JT1999(1)SC183; 1999(1)SCALE191; (2000)1SCC518; 1999(1)LC445(SC)

..... appellants before us made a claim for registration of occupancy rights under section 45 of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the act'] before the land tribunal in a proceeding initiated under section 48-a of the act. ..... have weighed with the appellate authority, particularly in the face of the admission made by the respondent that the appellants had constructed the building on the land and were paying charges in respect of the electric pump set used for irrigating the land and ought to have held that the appellants were cultivating the land. ..... appears to us that the appellate authority could not have placed any reliance on the subsequent revenue records inasmuch as the appellants had constructed the building on the land in dispute; that the electricity bills had been paid by them; that the 1 and was in their possession. ..... is also admitted by the respondent that the appellants had constructed a building on the land in dispute and had been paying electricity bills in respect of the charges arising for the electric pump set used for irrigating the land. ..... the face of this finding of fact the appellate authority could not raise the presumption under section 133 of the act that the entries made in the record of rights was correct. ..... the presumption arising under section 133 of the act in respect of the entries made in the record of rights stood displaced by the finding of fact recorded that the appellants were in actual possession of the land and were cultivating .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //