Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to in section 22 by excluding the proceedings with respect to the lands covered under the proviso to sub-clause (d) of sub-section (2) shall also mean and include, the proceedings under the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, land grant rules dharkasth rules or any other rules for grant * corrected vide court order dated 23.04.2021 607 of land, which has attained finality and not pending in appeal or ..... appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . it is contended that the partnership firm had purchased the lands under registered sale deed dated 03.11.1965 and in the year 1999 the forest guard, sangameshwarpet branch, balehonnur is said to have determined that certain lands in kadavanti village had been unauthorisedly encroached by ..... hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd .....
Tag this Judgment!