Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... 2 pointed out before the cgit that co-operative society started managing canteen on 15.12.1991 and thereafter in 1994, canteen was taken up departmentally; no steps under section 33a of the id act have been taken by petitioner union. m.g.k. ..... consideration in paras 25, 26 & 27 reveals that there the railway administration was competent to employ a staff committee or a co-operative society for the management of canteen and legal responsibilities for its proper management rested solely with railway administration. ..... from records it appears that these 13 employees were discontinued when contractor handed over possession on 15.12.1991 and the employees' co-operative society started managing that canteen. ..... the definition as contained in section 2(h) of mines act, 1952, to show when person can be said to be employed and section 58(o) and (p) thereof are pressed into service with provisions of chapter ix of the mines rules, 1955, dealing with canteen. ..... apex court in case of secretary,state of karnataka vs. ..... casteribe rajya parivahan karmchari sanghatana, reported at (2009) 8 scc 556, to urge that the judgment in the case of secretary, state of karnataka vs. ..... 2 being public employment, the regularization or absorption of contractor's employees could not have been ordered and he has placed reliance upon the judgment of constitution bench in the case of the secretary, state of karnataka vs. ..... the constitution bench judgment in the case of the secretary, state of karnataka vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!